Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 9 visitor Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 2009 Page 1 of about 56 results (0.161 seconds)

Sonali Mukherjee Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(12)SC626; 2009(13)SCALE42

..... 673 of 2001, filed by one sonali mukherjee, original accused no. 1 (hereinafter called 'a-1' for short), who stood convicted by the second additional sessions judge, pondicherry and madras high court and criminal appeal nos. 835-836 of 2002 filed by one dr. battacharya, the father of one biswajit (deceased), challenging the acquittal of one ..... 1), he filed a complaint on 21.6.1985, in which he made all the aforementioned allegations.12. after the complaint was filed before the chief judicial magistrate (cjm), pondicherry on 21.6.1985, the cjm committed it ..... order came to be pronounced in aforementioned calender case no. 4 of 1985, whereupon sonali mukherjee (a-1) pleaded guilty to the charges and instead of convicting her, she was released under section 4(1) of the probation of offenders act on executing a bond for rs. 500/-. when all this was known by dr. battacharya (pw- .....

State of Bihar Vs. Upendra Narayan Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(4)SC577; (2009)5MLJ39(SC); 2009(4)SCALE282; (2009)5SCC65; 2009(2)SLJ392(SC); 2009(4)LC1651(SC)

..... of kerala and ors.bishambar dutt : (1997)iillj381sc ; union of india and ors. v. mahender singh and ors. : (1997)iillj795sc ; p. ravindran and ors. v. union territory of pondicherry and ors. : (1997)1scc350 ; ashwani kumar and ors. v. state of bihar and ors. : (1997)iillj856sc ; santosh kumar verma and ors. v. state of bihar and ors. ..... equality of opportunity to all irrespective of their caste, colour, creed, race, religion and place of birth which constitutes one of the core values of the universal declaration of human rights also forms part of preamble to the constitution of india, which reads as under:we, the people of india, having solemnly resolved ..... would result in perpetuating illegalities and in the jettisoning of the scheme of public employment adopted by us while adopting the constitution. the approving of such acts also results in depriving many of their opportunity to compete for public employment. we have, therefore, to consider the question objectively and based on the .....

Bhuwalka Steel Indus. Ltd. Vs. Bombay Iron and Steel Labour Bd. and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR656; JT2009(15)SC269; (2010)ILLJ561SC; 2009(14)SCALE623; (2010)2SCC273; 2009(10)LC5041(SC)

..... time ago that a case is only an authority for what it actually decides and not what logically follows from it.the court further relied upon the decisions in bhavnagar university v. palitana sugar mill (p) ltd. : 2003 (2) scc 111, bharat petroleum corpn. ltd. v. n.r. vairamani : 2004 (8) scc 579 and ..... from this, it was suggested that it is only where the other legislations are unable to provide for the welfare and the better conditions, then alone this act (mathadi act) would be brought into force and, therefore, necessarily the unprotected workmen would be such workmen, who are deprived of the better conditions of service and further, ..... consistent interpretation for a considerable period and hence, that interpretation was liable to be respected, particularly because the rights and obligations of the parties covered by this act had remained settled for a long period of time. therefore, even if the earlier interpretation might not be strictly correct or where two views were possible, .....

R (on the Application of E) (Respondent) Vs. Governing Body of Jfs and ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... authority, citing jenkins v kingsgate (clothing productions) ltd [1981] 1 wlr 1485, 1494, per browne-wilkinson j; r v secretary of state for education and science, ex parte keating (1985) 84 lgr 469, 475, per taylor j; and ministry of defence v jeremiah [1980] qb 87, 98, per lord denning mr. the "but for" test was endorsed again ..... favours one racial group will be held to constitute racial discrimination against all who are not members of that group see, for instance, orphanos v queen mary college [1985] ac 761 at p. 771. nothing that i say in this judgment should be read as giving rise to criticism on moral grounds of the admissions policy of jfs ..... members of the dutch reformed church or because of some principle of public policy. however, the 1976 act banning direct discrimination is an application of public policy, rather like the decision of the of the united states supreme court in bob jones university v united states 461 us 574 (1983). i would however add that if, contrary to the .....

Laxmi Kant Bajpai Vs. Hazi Yaqoob and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(15)SC315; 2009(14)SCALE447; 2010(1)LC149(SC)

..... s cause of action or defendant's defence depends. what particulars could be said to be material facts would depend upon the facts of each case and no rule of universal application can be laid down. it is, however, absolutely essential that all basic and primary facts which must be proved at the trial by the party to establish ..... of action or the defendant's defence depends. what particulars could be said to be 'material facts' would depend upon the facts of each case and no rule of universal application can be laid down. it is, however, absolutely essential that all basic and primary facts which must be proved at the trial by the party to establish the ..... the case of lakshmi chandra sen and ors. v. a.k.m. hassan uzzaman and ors. : (1985) 4 scc 689, this court while discussing the scope of section 23(3) of the representation of peoples act, 1950, has stated:section 23(3) of the act of 1950 also points in the same direction. under that provision, no amendment, transposition or deletion of .....

R (on the Application of Barclay and Others) (Appellants) Vs. Secretar ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... forcibly: sark constitutional review committee, report on the future constitution of the island of sark, january 2002, para 62. 73. the reform law eventually introduced universal suffrage for the election of all those members who could vote on legislation. the fact that the reform law was enacted by, and therefore with the consent of ..... was maintained, "had been carefully drafted to avoid this difficulty": collected edition of the travaux pr paratoires of the european convention on human rights, vol viii (1985), pp 48-52, letter dated november 28, 1951, from chairman of the committee of ministers to the president of the consultative assembly. it was for that reason ..... united kingdom was "unsuitable for judicial determination" (at para 18, per lord bingham), the court was "neither concerned nor equipped to decide in whose interests the act was done" (at para 64, per lord hoffmann); or that, although the question might be justiciable, for it to be explored would give rise to great uncertainty .....

Pleasantime Products and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumb ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(170)LC225(SC); 2009(243)ELT641(SC); JT2009(14)SC392; 2009(13)SCALE681; 2009(10)LC4955(SC)

..... scrabble' - whether the product 'scrabble' is classifiable under sub-heading 9503.00 or sub-heading 9504.90 of the first schedule to the central excise and tariff act, 1985 ('ceta', for short).2. assessee is a proprietary firm engaged inter alia in the business of manufacture and trade of toys, games and puzzles of various kinds ..... was classifiable under sub-heading 9504.90 of the ceta. the scn also invoked longer period of limitation under section 11a(1) of the central excise act, 1944 ('1944 act', for short) alleging that the declarations filed by the assessee failed to mention that the assessee was manufacturing board games and that they had deliberately suppressed ..... period of limitation. in reply to scn, assessee submitted that the longer period of limitation could not be invoked under section 11a(1) of the 1944 act as the assessee had stated in their declarations that they were manufacturing toys and puzzles classifiable under sub-heading 9503.00 as well as under sub-heading 9504 .....

University of Kerala Vs. Council, Principals', Colleges, Kerala and Or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(14)SC283; 2009(14)SCALE14

..... m. lyngdoh, retd. chief election commissioner(chairman).2. dr. zoya hassan3. professor pratap bhanu mehta4. dr. daya nand dongaonkar (secretary general of the association of indian universities).8. apart from the aforesaid members in the committee, two other members were to be nominated by the ministry of human resources and development.9. consequent to the ..... may be noted that the judges make law is also shared by several accomplished jurists. judge richard a. posner, in `the federal courts: crisis and reform, 1985' argues that even though 'judges are not supposed to and generally do not make law with the same freedom that legislatures can and do'; the 'fact remains ..... scc 187 : air 1990 sc 334, this court observed:there can be no doubt that an authority exercising legislative function cannot be directed to do a particular act. similarly the president of india cannot be directed by the court to grant approval to the proposals made by the registrar general of the supreme court, presumably on .....

P.V. Radha Krishna and ors. Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2010)1SCC11; 2010(1)SLJ196(SC); 2009(10)LC4519(SC)

..... administrative exigencies, must enable person so transferred to carry the benefit of his seniority to the transferred local cadre. to this extent rule 3 of the rules made under the act 1985 must be held to be valid.in the case of a transfer on reciprocal basis, para 5(2)(d) itself mandates that the person transferred shall be assigned seniority in ..... also specified the area of hyderabad city (zone vii) as comprising the following:(a) hyderabad municipal corporation area -(i) hyderabad division(ii) secunderabad division(b) secunderabad cantonment area(c) usmania university campus(d) zamastanpur village panchayat area(e) fatehnagar panchayat area(f) bowenpalle panchayat area(g) machabolaram panchayat area(h) lalgura village panchayat area(i) malkagiri panchayat area(j) uppalkalasa panchayat .....

Tika Ram and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(12)SC1; 2009(12)SCALE349; (2009)10SCC689:2009AIRSCW6465

..... reported in : 1996 (11) scc 462. this court was considering this very proviso of section 17(4) inserted by land acquisition [u.p. amendment and validation act, 1991 [up act no. 5 of 1991] and relying upon the judgment reported as gda v. jan kalyan samiti, sheopuri reported in : 1996 (2) scc 365, the court took ..... were, therefore, seriously questioned by the counsel. it was also pointed out that the land involved in this case was already taken over in the year 1985 and the same also stood utilized inasmuch as the whole township had come up thereupon. learned counsel also relied on the principle of staire decisis insofar as the ..... the question of date of taking possession, non payment of 80% compensation and the policy of the state government regarding cooperative societies. constitutional validity of the principal act provisionsdoctrine of per incuriam18. these contentions of shri trivedi, learned senior counsel were adopted by shri qamar ahmad, learned counsel who led the arguments in tika .....