Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 9 visitor Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 3,286 results (0.188 seconds)

Indian Young Lawyers Association Vs. The State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... protected religions, beliefs or practices. 161 159 faizan mustafa and jagteshwar singh sohi, freedom of religion in india: current issues and supreme court acting as clergy, brigham young university review (2017) 160 jaclyn l neo, definitional imbroglios: a critique of the definition of religion and essential practice tests in religious freedom ..... centres in india as well as abroad. after the death of sri aurobindo, the mother proposed an international cultural township, auroville, in the then pondicherry. the society received funds as grants from the central government, state 58 government and other organizations in india as well as from outside india ..... pertaining to biological characteristics is not only unfounded, indefensible and implausible but can also never pass the muster of constitutionality.4. it is a universal truth that faith and religion do not countenance discrimination but religious practices are sometimes seen as perpetuating patriarchy thereby negating the basic tenets of .....

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. P. K. Sinha

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the states of karnataka, kerala, tamil nadu and union territory puducherry (then pondicherry; and whereas the tribunal investigated the matters referred to it and forwarded to the central government a report under sub-section (2) of section 5 of the said act, on 05.02.2007. the party states filed special leave petitions (slps ..... (b) chairman of the authority can invite representatives commission, national institute of from central water hydrology, indian agricultural research (iari) and/or any other agency including universities as special invitees to attend the authority meetings or otherwise, in carrying out the functions (c) frame its own rules for the 6. no member, officer ..... and independent members) shall be borne by the state governments, in the ratio of kerala 15% karnataka 40%, tamil nadu 40%; and union territory of pondicherry 5%. the expenses pertaining to member representing a state shall be borne by the state concerned. (ii) the cost of maintaining, operation and controlling of .....

Union of India Vs. Pushpavathi &Amp; Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 50 cen situated in village pillaichavadi, pondicherry for public purpose, namely, establishment of central university (phase-v). this was followed by a declaration issued under section 6 of the act on 12.03.1987. the acquired land included the lands belonging to the respondents herein.6. the land ..... writ petitioners in the writ petitions before the high court.5. in exercise of the powers conferred under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the act ), the government of pondicherry on 22.12.1986 issued a notification seeking to acquire land bearing survey no.2 pt. of an extent of 3 hec. 83 ares ..... acquisition officer (lao) passed an award (no.2/1987) under section 11 of the act on 3 01.06.1987 .....

Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust and Ors Vs. R Ramanathan and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... make a representation and the government of india passed an order in december, 2008 directing the state government of delhi and the union government in pondicherry to ensure that there should be no publication of the objectionable book without obtaining a no objection from the government of india.15. the government of ..... the trust disassociating itself from the objectionable book and no steps were taken by the appellants to stop the publication of the book by contacting columbia university press in the united states, while independent organizations such as google, flipkart and a1 books made the objectionable book permanently unavailable on their websites ..... disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or (b) commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely .....

New Horizon Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Govt. of Pondicherry.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2013SC584; 2012(10)SCC575; AIR2012SCW5164

..... state list.40. in addition to the above, it has also to be noticed that the objects for which the tamil nadu act, the maharashtra act and the pondicherry act were enacted, are identical, namely, to protect the interests of small depositors from fraud perpetrated on unsuspecting investors, who entrusted their ..... lending and money-lenders; relief of agricultural indebtedness.32. incorporation, regulation and winding up of corporations, other than those specified in list i, and universities; unincorporated trading, literary, scientific, religious and other societies and associations; co-operative societies.39. the entries relating to the state list referred to ..... operative societies.44. incorporation, regulation and winding up of corporations, whether trading or not, with objects not confined to one state, but not including universities.45. banking.38. in other words, each of the above-mentioned entries deal with matters relating to trading corporations, which include banking, insurance and .....

Girnar Traders and Digambar Motiram Jhadhav. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the subsequent benches have not taken into consideration the impact of the judgment of the constitution bench of this court in b. shama rao v. union territory of pondicherry [(1967) 2 scr 650]. a pertinent constitutional aspect that ought to have been brought to the notice of different benches was that the federal structure of the constitution ..... for the court to hold that such a statute is a self-contained code.it may not be possible to state parameters of universal application which could determine with precision as to whether an act is a self-contained code or not. it is difficult and, in fact, may not even be permissible to formulate any hard ..... had come into force which controlled governance of the country and therefore the principles, inter alia, stated by the privy council could not be adopted as law of universal application without appropriately modifying the stated position of law to bring it in complete harmony with the constitutional mandate. in the case of gauri shankar gaur v. .....

Sonali Mukherjee Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(12)SC626; 2009(13)SCALE42

..... 673 of 2001, filed by one sonali mukherjee, original accused no. 1 (hereinafter called 'a-1' for short), who stood convicted by the second additional sessions judge, pondicherry and madras high court and criminal appeal nos. 835-836 of 2002 filed by one dr. battacharya, the father of one biswajit (deceased), challenging the acquittal of one ..... 1), he filed a complaint on 21.6.1985, in which he made all the aforementioned allegations.12. after the complaint was filed before the chief judicial magistrate (cjm), pondicherry on 21.6.1985, the cjm committed it ..... order came to be pronounced in aforementioned calender case no. 4 of 1985, whereupon sonali mukherjee (a-1) pleaded guilty to the charges and instead of convicting her, she was released under section 4(1) of the probation of offenders act on executing a bond for rs. 500/-. when all this was known by dr. battacharya (pw- .....

State of Bihar Vs. Upendra Narayan Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(4)SC577; (2009)5MLJ39(SC); 2009(4)SCALE282; (2009)5SCC65; 2009(2)SLJ392(SC); 2009(4)LC1651(SC)

..... of kerala and ors.bishambar dutt : (1997)iillj381sc ; union of india and ors. v. mahender singh and ors. : (1997)iillj795sc ; p. ravindran and ors. v. union territory of pondicherry and ors. : (1997)1scc350 ; ashwani kumar and ors. v. state of bihar and ors. : (1997)iillj856sc ; santosh kumar verma and ors. v. state of bihar and ors. ..... equality of opportunity to all irrespective of their caste, colour, creed, race, religion and place of birth which constitutes one of the core values of the universal declaration of human rights also forms part of preamble to the constitution of india, which reads as under:we, the people of india, having solemnly resolved ..... would result in perpetuating illegalities and in the jettisoning of the scheme of public employment adopted by us while adopting the constitution. the approving of such acts also results in depriving many of their opportunity to compete for public employment. we have, therefore, to consider the question objectively and based on the .....

Southern Petrochemical Industries Co. Ltd. Vs. Electricity Inspector a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC1984; 2007(2)CTC273; 2007LC(SC)1166; (2007)4MLJ723(SC); 2007(7)SCALE392; (2007)5SCC447; 2007AIRSCW3752; JT2007(7)SC613;

..... entered into by and between the two nations on 1st november, 1954, the entire administration of french settlement vested in the government of india. the territory of pondicherry, thus, became a free port without any restriction in case of most imports. however, by reason of a notification dated 30th october, 1954, the importers in ..... in its own language. proviso, as is well known, has four functions, as has been noticed by this court in s. sundaram pillai v. v.r. pattabiraman : [1985]2scr643 in the following terms:43. (1) qualifying or excepting certain provisions from the main enactment;(2) it may entirely change the very concept of the intendment of the enactment ..... whereas sub-section (1) of section 20 of the 2003 act contains a similar provision as section 6 of the general clauses act, clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (1) of section 20 of the 2003 act are clearly attracted. reliance in this behalf has been placed on universal imports agency and anr. v. the chief controller of imports .....

Mr. V. Narayanaswamy Vs. Mr. C.P. Thirunavukkarasu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC694; JT2000(1)SC194; 2000(1)SCALE153; (2000)2SCC294; [2000]1SCR292

..... congress. this amounted to exercise of undue influence to secure the votes of the mlas, particularly the mlas who were nominated as chairmen. the government of pondicherry was headed by mr. r. v. janakiraman, who acted as agent of the respondent. announcement of the notification materially affected the result of the election, (para 11 of the election petition)3. after the date ..... , deputy speaker and mr. k. rajasekharan, parliamentary secretary to the chief minister. all these four persons acted as agents for the respondent in the election, (para 6 of the election petition)2. after the commencement of the election process on september 26, 1997 government of pondicherry announced appointment of chairmen for five state owned corporations. it was published in the daily newspaper .....