Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 9 visitor Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 3,245 results (0.146 seconds)

French India Importing Corporation, Delhi Vs. the Chief Controller of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1752; 1983LC2169D(SC); [1962]2SCR410

..... by the petitioners would therefore have to depend on the proper interpretation of the relevant notifications, because as already seen as the sea customs act and the tariff act, etc., having been extended to pondicherry territory, etc., from and after november 1, 1954, prima facie duty would be payable on the import. we have already pointed ..... counsel amounted to saying that the point about the exemption of the petitioners from payment of customs duty is also covered by the decision of this court in universal imports agency's case : [1961]1scr305 , we consider it wholly unjustified. as we have already shown, the liability to pay customs duty was admitted by ..... law which prevailed before november 1, 1954, to obtain foreign exchange requirements by what are termed 'open market purchases'. in fact, in the case of the universal imports agency : [1961]1scr305 the orders impugned were passed and were sought to be supported before this court on the ground that the foreign exchange requirements were .....

Pioneer Traders and ors. Vs. Chief Controller of Imports and Exports P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1963SC734; 1983(13)ELT1376(SC); [1963]Supp1SCR349

..... petitions in this court in 1959 challenging the order of confiscation and the alternative order imposing penalties on them by the collector of customs, pondicherry, in somewhat similar circumstances : (see messrs. universal imports agency v. the chief controller of imports and exports : [1961]1scr305 ). those petitions were decided on august 23, 1960 and this court held that in ..... the misconstruction, if any, would be of para. 6 of s.r.o. 3315. this in our opinion is not correct. the sea customs act was applied to pondicherry by s.r.o. 3315. this s.r.o. has six paragraphs. the first paragraph gives the name of the s.r.o. and the ..... of such jurisdiction did not offend any fundamental right. but we think that case is clearly distinguishable. das, j., there stated that 'if a quasi-judicial authority acts without jurisdiction or wrongly assumes jurisdiction by committing an error as to a collateral fact and the resultant action threatens or violates a fundamental right, the question of .....

Dr. Jagadish Saran and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC820; (1980)2SCC768; [1980]2SCR831

..... equalisation are not idle incantation but actuality, not me real but real, life. but can a university, acting within the constitutional parameters, create a new kind of discrimination viz., reservation for students of a particular university? the literal terms of article 14 do not tolerate it, the text of article 15 does not ..... environmentally, to develop his potential, each will be able, in his own way, to manifest his faculty fully. the philosophy and pragmatism of universal excellence through universal equal opportunity is part of our culture and constitutional creed.17. this norm of non-discrimination, however, admits of just exceptions geared to equality ..... other universities is left for open competition the delhi students cannot be made martyrs of the constitution.53. even so, 'reservation' must be administered in moderation, if it is to be constitutional. some central technical institutions like the all india institute of medical sciences, delhi and chandigarh and the pondicherry .....

New Horizon Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Govt. of Pondicherry.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2013SC584; 2012(10)SCC575; AIR2012SCW5164

..... state list.40. in addition to the above, it has also to be noticed that the objects for which the tamil nadu act, the maharashtra act and the pondicherry act were enacted, are identical, namely, to protect the interests of small depositors from fraud perpetrated on unsuspecting investors, who entrusted their ..... lending and money-lenders; relief of agricultural indebtedness.32. incorporation, regulation and winding up of corporations, other than those specified in list i, and universities; unincorporated trading, literary, scientific, religious and other societies and associations; co-operative societies.39. the entries relating to the state list referred to ..... operative societies.44. incorporation, regulation and winding up of corporations, whether trading or not, with objects not confined to one state, but not including universities.45. banking.38. in other words, each of the above-mentioned entries deal with matters relating to trading corporations, which include banking, insurance and .....

Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust and Ors Vs. R Ramanathan and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... make a representation and the government of india passed an order in december, 2008 directing the state government of delhi and the union government in pondicherry to ensure that there should be no publication of the objectionable book without obtaining a no objection from the government of india.15. the government of ..... the trust disassociating itself from the objectionable book and no steps were taken by the appellants to stop the publication of the book by contacting columbia university press in the united states, while independent organizations such as google, flipkart and a1 books made the objectionable book permanently unavailable on their websites ..... disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or (b) commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely .....

Ujjam Bai. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC1621; 1963(1)SCR778

..... specified in section 58 and could not be for a lesser period. the question was therefore of jurisdiction.in universal imports agency v. the chief controller of imports and exports ([1961] 1 s.c.r. 305.), the petitioners, in pondicherry, entered before its merger with india, into firm contracts with foreign sellers and the goods agreed to be ..... was not a petition under article 32. in that case the sales tax under explanation ii to section 2(g) of the central provinces & berar sales tax act (act 2 of 1947) was held ultra vires of the state legislature because it offended article 286(1)(a) and its imposition or threat of imposition was held without ..... ) 1 k.b. 171, 205.) :"whenever any body or persons having legal authority to determine questions affecting the rights of subjects and having the duty to act judicially act in excess of their legal authority they are subject to the controlling jurisdiction of the kings bench division exercised in these writs."what was said of judicial action and .....

Smt. Ujjam Bai Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1963]1SCR778; [1963]Supp2SCR778

..... specified in section 58 and could not be for a lesser period. the question was therefore of jurisdiction. 138. in universal imports agency v. the chief controller of imports and exports : [1961]1scr305 , the petitioners, in pondicherry, entered before its merger with india, into firm contracts with foreign sellers and the goods agreed to be imported were ..... was not a petition under article 32. in that case the sales tax under explanation ii to section 2(g) of the central provinces & berar sales tax act (act 2 of 1947) was held ultra vires of the state legislature because it offended article 286(1)(a) and its imposition or threat of imposition was held ..... (1924) 1 k.b. 171 : 'whenever any body or persons having legal authority to determine questions affecting the rights of subjects and having the duty to act judicially act in excess of their legal authority they are subject to the controlling jurisdiction of the kings bench division exercised in these writs.' 227. what was said of judicial .....

Poona Electric Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC30; [1965]57ITR521(SC); [1965]3SCR818

..... the contention on behalf of the revenue, lord macmillan explained his earlier observations thus : 'when, therefore, in the passage referred to by the attorney-general in the pondicherry case, i said that 'a payment out of profits and conditional or profits being earned cannot accurately be described as a payment made to earn profits', i was ..... case of a joint venture by two companies; and lord maugham pointed out thus : 'it may be admitted that, as mr. latter contended, it is not universally true to say that a payment the making of which is conditional on profits being earned cannot properly be described as an expenditure incurred for the purpose of earning ..... and regulate the rates chargeable for the energy supplied in the interest of the public and for electrical development. the rules embodied in the sixth schedule to the act are intended only to achieve that object. under the said rules certain appropriations and certain deductions have to be made to arrive at the clear profit; otherwise .....

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. P. K. Sinha

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the states of karnataka, kerala, tamil nadu and union territory puducherry (then pondicherry; and whereas the tribunal investigated the matters referred to it and forwarded to the central government a report under sub-section (2) of section 5 of the said act, on 05.02.2007. the party states filed special leave petitions (slps ..... (b) chairman of the authority can invite representatives commission, national institute of from central water hydrology, indian agricultural research (iari) and/or any other agency including universities as special invitees to attend the authority meetings or otherwise, in carrying out the functions (c) frame its own rules for the 6. no member, officer ..... and independent members) shall be borne by the state governments, in the ratio of kerala 15% karnataka 40%, tamil nadu 40%; and union territory of pondicherry 5%. the expenses pertaining to member representing a state shall be borne by the state concerned. (ii) the cost of maintaining, operation and controlling of .....

The Nandlal Bhandari Mills Ltd., Indore Vs. the State of Madhya Bharat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1963SC332; [1961]43ITR143(SC); [1962]2SCR859

..... of income-tax (1937) i.t.r. 270, in which the decision in the pondicherry railway company case (1931) l.r. 58(i) a. 239 was explained. in the case before the privy council, lord maugham observed : 'it is not universally true to say that a payment the making of which is conditional on profits being earned cannot ..... uncontrolled sovereign powers. he was the supreme legislature, the supreme judiciary and the supreme head of the executive, and there were no constitutional limitations upon his authority to act in any of these capacities. the firmans were expressions of the sovereign will of the nizam and they were blinding in the same way as any other law; ..... are thus confined to the legislative force of the notifications issued in 1931, 1932 and 1933 respectively. the appellant's contention is that the notifications were not an act of legislation but an interpretation by the sovereign. mr. desai concedes that if they be regarded as legislation, then the later decisions of the privy council and .....