Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 9 visitor Court: mumbai Page 89 of about 1,611 results (0.125 seconds)

Saiba Developers (P.) Ltd. Vs. Fifteenth Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1992)40ITD419(Mum.)

..... (coch.), cit v. mathulal baldeo prasad [1961 ] 42 itr 517 (all.), shrikant textiles v. cit [1971] 81 itr 222 (bom.) and ito v. pfizer corpn. [1985] 12 itd 351 (bom.) and also the decision of the supreme court in satish kumar v. surinder kumar air 4. the departmental representative, on the other hand, relying upon ..... squarely apply to the facts before us. in the case before the supreme court, it was concerned with the provisions of section 326 of the companies act, 1956, which contained an absolute prohibition against an appointment or reappointment of a managing agent before approval of the central government was obtained. in those circumstances ..... the liability does not determine the accrual of liability. the fact that, the amount was never paid is only irrelevant for allowing the deduction under the act in respect of genuine liability accruing within the previous year. the learned counsel for the assessee reiterated that the damages became completely ascertained liability within the .....

Oil and Natural Gas Commission Now Called Oil and Natural Gas Corporat ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1998(4)ALLMR430; 1999(1)BomCR4; [1999]236ITR544(Bom)

..... . shashikant & co., : air1987sc81 .15. the decision of the privy counsel in champsey bhara's case was explained by the supreme court in dr. s.dutt v. university of delhi, : [1959]1scr1236 . it was argued before the supreme court that even if the decision of the arbitrator was erroneous but that was not enough; before it ..... be stated as follows. the petitioner is a statutory public sector corporation engaged in oil exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas. on 6th april, 1985, the petitioner published a tender notice inviting tenders from qualified marine construction contractors. the scope of work for which ongc sought bids included the design, engineering, procurement, ..... payable by them having regard to the provisions in section 162{2) of the income-tax act. it was also accepted by the umpire that the income-tax department treated the petitioner both for the assessment year 1985-86 and assessment year 1986-87 as a representative assessee. it was observed by the umpire .....

Haribai W/O Digambarrao Bhise Died Through L.Rs. and Ku. Jamunabai D/O ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR112; 2009(6)MhLj75

..... can be culled out consistently with the rule of law, the courts are required to take that course.14. in the case of bajrang factory ltd. and anr. v. university of calcutta and ors. : (2007)7scc183 , it is observed as under:with a view to ascertain the intention of the maker of the will, not only the terms ..... kallam on 18.12.1980, which judgment and decree is further confirmed by the district judge, osmanabad in regular civil appeal no. 16 of 1981 decided on 14.10.1985.2. brief facts giving rise to this appeal may be stated as follows:one mukundrao had two wives, tulsabai and rangubai. original appellant haribai is daughter of rangubai. ..... of the intention of the testator with respect to his property which he desires to be carried into effect after his death.9. section 122 of the transfer of property act, 1882 defines 'gift' as follows:'gift' is the transfer of certain existing moveable or immoveable property made voluntarily and without consideration, by one person called the donor, to .....

Pandurang Rangnath Chavan Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1998(3)ALLMR528; 1998(4)BomCR462

..... committee was that as a result of the spread of education, many boys and girls of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, who had attained secondary or university level education, had, in the absence of adequate educational facilities near their homes, migrated to regional cities or state headquarters or even outside the state to prosecute ..... scheduled tribes as per entry 21 in the first schedule part iii dealing with erstwhile bombay state. (ii) by the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1956, (act no. 63 of 1956) the 1950 order was amended and as against only thakurs being scheduled tribes, thakur or thakar, including ka thakur, ka thakar, ma ..... thakur' which is amalgamation of certain sub-caste.the details of this sub-caste are given in the accompaniment to thegovernment resolution dated 24th april 1985, though the list is notexhaustive and is merely illustrative. from entry no. 44 in the iischedule to the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes order (amendment .....

Mrs. Vanmala Manoharrao Kamdi and Others Vs. the Deputy Charity Commis ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... can neither be put in a straitjacket nor is it a general rule of universal application. 37. thus, looked at the principles enunciated by the apex court, even though the act or order under section 41a of the b.p.t. act, 1950 is of the administrative nature, it would be always desirable to afford ..... of receiver, injunction, sub-mission of budget estimates are some of the powers which the charity commissioners are entrusted with under madras and orissa acts and english act (charities act, 1960). the charity commissioners were judicial officers of the status of district judges who were already enjoying some of the powers under the civil procedure code and ..... legal representatives (a) govindram khushaldas and others). (14) air 1970 supreme court 150 (a.k. kraipak and others..versus.. union of india and others). (15) air 1985 supreme court 1121 (anil kumar ..versus.. presiding officer and others). (16) air 1987 supreme court 1802 (1)(union of india and another ..versus cynamide india ltd. and .....

Magasvargiya Shikshan Sanstha and Another Vs. Bhausaheb Sonaji Kakade ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... dr. (mrs.) sumitra dash [2004 (101) flr 999], xx. vivek nand sethi vs. chairman, j and k bank ltd. [2005 (106) flr 207] and xxi. banaras hindu university vs. shrikant [2006 (11) scc 42]. 48. shri dixit has relied upon the following judgments:- i. union of india vs. deoki nandan aggarwal [air 1992 sc 96], ii. anandji ..... / management shall take a decision considering the overall performance of the appellant /employee of 2 years as a probationer in accordance with the requirements of the 1977 act and 1981 rules and pass, necessarily, a reasoned order with regard to whether the appellant employee deserves to be confirmed in service. needless to state that the petitioners ..... vi. k.l.tripathi vs. sbi and others [1984 (48) flr 38], vii. workmen of hindustan steel ltd. vs. hindustan steel ltd. [1985 (1) llj 267], viii. union of india vs. tulsiram patel [1985 scc (l and s) 672], ix. delhi transport corporation vs. dtc majdoor congress [1991 scc (l and s) 1213, x. mafatlal engineering industries .....

SachIn Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2001)(127)ELT108Tri(Mum.)bai

..... to be awarded to the as-sessee for wrongful retention of the amount by the department.6. the central administrative tribunal created under the administrative tribunal act 1985 exercises powers to award interest. this power arises from the enabling provisions under section 14 thereof which vests the tribunal with all powers that stood vested ..... of interest.since the subject matter of the appeal and the misc. application is the same, these were heard together. since the issue is of universal interest, the counsels who were not representing the present appellants and applications were also invited to state their views.3. we have heard shri mondal, consultant ..... on tax refunded shows that where the parliament wanted to provide for such interest, it did provide therefor expressly. the omission to provide for interest under this act must, therefore, be held to be deliberate. this legislative intention, in our opinion, is equally relevant in examining whether interest should be awarded on general .....

Force Motors Ltd., Pune Vs. Shantilal Hukumchand Sancheti and anr.

Court : Mumbai

..... the industrial court was dismissed on 30th july, 2001. soon thereafter on 3rd september, 2001, the miscellaneous application filed under section 50 of the mrtu & pulp act was also dismissed by the labour court by concluding that it did not have the jurisdiction to decide the miscellaneous application. the industrial court set aside this order of ..... /. criminal complaint (ulp) no.22 of 1993 was also filed by the workman under section 48 of the mrtu & pulp act. the process issued by the labour court against the managing ..... , (for short "the mrtu & pulp act"), claiming that he was entitled to the benefits of settlements which were signed by the company with the union representing the employees while he was out of service. these settlements were signed on 24th january, 1985, 22nd june, 1988 and 30th april, 1993. the workman claimed an amount of `2,41,096 .....

P.C. Joshi, Indian Citizen, A practicing Advocate and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Mumbai

..... conduct without exposing itself to the charge of dereliction of public duty on the trisection of rule 36 and blind to the 'law for lawyers'? 19. it has been universally understood, wherever there is an organised bar assisting in administering justice, that an attorney, solicitor, barrister or advocate will be suspended or disbarred for soliciting legal business. and ..... of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of m/s. k. m. mohamad ahdul khader firm v/s. state of tamil nadu reported in air 1985 supreme court 12 and other decisions to urge that a tax unless it is confiscatory in nature cannot be said to be a unreasonable restriction upon the freedom of ..... 30/2012 dated 20th june, 2012 and submits that by this notification and which is issued under exercise of the powers conferred by section 68(2) of the finance act, 1994 (act 32 of 1994) and in supersession of clause (i) of notification of the government of india in the ministry of finance (department of revenue) no.15/2012service tax .....

T.A.I.Pharma Ltd. Vs. Wockhardt Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

..... 1698). reliance was also placed on the decision of the apex court in the case of renusagar power co.ltd. vs. general electric company and another (air 1985 sc 1156). lastly, reliance was also placed on the decision of the learned single judge in the case of m/s.kishan swaroop ashokkumar and others. 8. our ..... . the plaintiffs are entitled to recover the amount under the bills of exchange from the defendants as per statutory provisions contained in section 145 of the indian contract act. (emphasis added) in paragraph 9, the plaintiffs have stated thus: 9 the plaintiffs' claim is arising out of bills of exchanges and statutory provisions contained in ..... 1st january 2007. in the said agreement, the plaintiffs were described as sellers and the defendants were described as clearing and forwarding agents. the defendants agreed to act as agents of the plaintiffs' products for the purpose of importing/stocking the products and selling the products as instructed at the risk of the plaintiffs. 3. .....