Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 9 visitor Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 1,611 results (0.233 seconds)

Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry and Others Vs. State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

..... the legal position is exactly the same. by reason of the indo-french agreement the government of india made the order under the foreign jurisdiction act applying the indian laws to pondicherry. the effect of that order was that the french laws were repealed by the application of the indian laws in the same field occupied ..... our findings aforementioned. construction would vary from statute to statute. 114. it is profitable to notice at this stage a decision of this court in m/s. universal imports agency (supra). in that case under the indo-french agreement entered into by and between the two nations on 1st november, 1954, the entire administration of ..... undertaken, there has been no success. a suggestion for introducing economic criterion for explaining the term was made in the approach to the seventh five year plan (1985-1990) brought out by the planning commission and approved by the national development council and the union government. a lot of controversy was raised in parliament and the .....

Union of India and ors. Vs. Alok Exports Etc.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1980Bom280; 1989(24)LC677(Bombay)

..... remedy may be instituted, continued or enforced, any such penalty, forfeiture or punishment may be imposed as if the repealing act or regulation had not been passed'.in this connection, mr. bhatt relied upon the decision of the supreme court in universal imports agency v. chief controller of imports and exports : [1961]1scr305 . in that case by the reason of the indo ..... -french agreement d/- 21st oct., 1954, the govt. of india made the french establishments (application of laws) order (1954) under the foreign jurisdiction act (1947) applying the indian laws to pondicherry. the effect of that order .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. Poona Electric Supply Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1963]49ITR913(Bom)

..... v. commissioners of inland revenue, sowrey (surveyor of taxes) v. harbour mooring commissioners of king's lynn, bharat insurance co. ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax and pondicherry railway co. ltd. v. commissioner income-tax. 6. mr. kolah, on the other hand, contends that clause i of the sixth schedule enjoins a duty on the ..... accounting years being calendar year 1952 and calendar year 1953. the assessee claimed these amounts as permissible allowance under section 10(2) (xv) of the income-tax act. it appears that in the earlier years the practice of the department had been that the amounts credited to the 'consumers benefit reserve account' were not allowed as ..... been accepted by their lordships of the privy council in a later case as one of universal application. in indian radio and cable communications company ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax, it has been observed : '.... it is not universally true to say that a payment the making of which is conditional on profits being earned .....

Vithaldas Thakordas and Company Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax Bombay.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1947Bom302; [1946]14ITR822(Bom)

..... the purposes of earning their profits and was a permissible deduction. sir john beaumont frankly confessed that in the past he had wrongly understood the principle of the pondicherry case ; but the subsequent decisions had made the position clear. he observes that the question whether the payment of part of a commission to a third person ..... particular observation applied to the facts found in that case; and lord maugham in the indian radio and cable communications companys case expressly stated that it was not universally true to say that a payment, the making of which was conditional on profits being earned, could not properly be described as an expenditure incurred for the ..... our judgment the sum paid to bai tarabai is an item of revenue expenditure and admissible for deduction under section 10(2)(xii) of the income-tax act. accordingly the first question referred to us must be answered in the negative and the second question in the affirmative.the commissioner must pay the costs throughout .....

Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Engineer's Association, Nagpur, t ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1968Bom65; (1967)69BOMLR674; 1967MhLJ783

..... in our opinion the contentions raised on behalf of the respondents are not well founded. in the punjab case, the question was whether the punjab university constituted under the universities act, was a 'state' within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution. the division bench apparently followed the reasoning in the madras case ..... whether an authority would be 'other authority' within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution.(10) in k.s. ramamurthy v. chief court missioner, pondicherry, : [1964]1scr656 . their lordships observed as follows in paragraph 11:-'article 12 gives an inclusive definition of the words the state and with in ..... discharges any of the sovereign function of the state. the respondents have invited our attention to the following decisions in support of their contention: krishan gopal v. punjab university , university of madras v. shanthabai, : air1954mad67 , surendra kumar, v. central board of secondary education, ajmer, air 1957 raj 206, ena ghosh v. state of .....

Harinarayan G. Bajaj Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through Secretary, Mini ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR604; 2008(2)BomCR780; [2009]147CompCas579(Bom); [2008]82SCL79(Bom)

..... its own language. proviso, as is well known, has four functions, as has been noticed by this court in s. sundaram pillai v. v.r. pattabiraman : [1985]2scr643 , in the following terms: (scc p. 610, para 43) '43.(1) qualifying or excepting certain provisions from the main enactment; (2) it may entirely ..... takeoverregulationregulation 2 (b)definition of acquirer:'acquirer: means any person who acquires or agrees to acquire sharesin a company either by himself or with any person acting in concert with theacquirer:.regulation 2 (b)'acquirer: means any person who, directly or indirectly acquires oragrees to acquire shares or voting rights in the target ..... agency (universal imports agency v. chief controller of imports and exports) : [1961]1scr305 . in that case under the indo french agreement entered into by and between the two nations on 1111954, the entire administration of french settlement vested in the government of india. the territory of pondicherry, thus, became a free port without any .....

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Engineers' Association, Nagpur Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1968)ILLJ197Bom

..... , the contentions raised on behalf of the respondents are not well-founded. in the punjab case, the question was whether the punjab university constituted under the universities act, was a 'state' within the meaning of art. 12 of the constitution. the division bench apparently followed the reasoning in the madras case in ..... be applied in determining whether an authority would be 'other authority' within the meaning of art. 12 of the constitution. 12. in k. s. ramamurthi v. chief commissioner, pondicherry : [1964]1scr656 , their lordships observed as follows in para. 11 : '. . . art. 12 gives an inclusive definition of the words 'the state' and within ..... any of the sovereign functions of the state. the respondents have invited our attention to the following decisions in support of their contention : krishan gopal v. punjab university ; university of madras v. shantha bai : air1954mad67 ; surendra kumar v. central board of secondary education a.i.r. 1957 raj 206; ena ghosh v. state of .....

Dattatraya Gopal Paranjpe Vs. Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR246; (1995)IILLJ913Bom

..... to case on the peculiar facts of each case. 31. mr. kochar then relied on the judgment of a division bench of the madras high court in pondicherry state weavers co-op society v. regional director, employees state insurance corporation, madras : (1983)illj17mad and of the supreme court in shri ram prasad v. ..... . 2(j). (d) constitutional and competently enacted legislative provisions may well remove for the scope of the act categories which otherwise may be covered thereby. we over-rule safdarjang, solicitor's case gymkhana, delhi university, dhanrajgirji hospital and other rulings whose ration runs counter to the principles enunciated above, and hospital mazdoor sabha ..... (1983)iillj429sc , ved prakash gupta v. delton cable india (p) ltd. : (1984)illj546sc and arkal govind raj rao v. ciba geigy of india ltd. bombay 1985 supp. 1 scr 2821 were without noticing that the view accepted therein had been expressly negative by a larger bench and, therefore, the observations in the latter judgments had .....

Favourite Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... to excise duty and said that other imported items such as bottles, corks, wire rods and foils will be chargeable to duty in terms of section 68 of customs act, 1962. section 68 provides for levy of customs duty on goods cleared for home consumption from a customs bonded warehouse. the sentence that the commissioner has relied upon to ..... accept this submission. he found that the benefit of the exemption was not available, denied it and demanded duty from and also demanding interest under section 11ab of the act. hence this appeal.2. the reasons that the commissioner advances for not extending the benefit of the exemption are as follows. chapter ix of the export import policy provides ..... of paragraph 9.20 of the export import policy april 1997 - march 2002 is in excess of the aggregate amount of excise duty leviable under section 3 of the act or any other law for the time being in force. notice issued to it proposed to deny the exemption on the ground that the goods were not manufactured wholly .....

Marathwada Association for Social Services Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR784; 2005(3)MhLj308

..... order to streamline the procedure for grant of permission to open new college or institution of higher learning keeping in mind the provisions of the maharashtra universities act we have framed guidelines appearing hereinafter.we direct the respondents to follow statutory provisions as well as regulations; in the matter of grant of permission/affiliation ..... any merit. however, we are of the opinion that some directions need to be given to the respondents to follow the norms prescribed under the maharashtra universities act as well as the norms prescribed by the n.c.t.e. while granting permission or issue no objection certificates. in the present matter though ..... the request they are loosing their career.3. petitioner trust is registered under bombay public trust act in the year 1985 for the purpose of imparting education. in the year 2003 petitioner trust submitted proposal to respondent no. 4 university for running b.ed. college in urdu medium. the said proposal was- forwarded to the .....