Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 4 objects Sorted by: recent Court: punjab and haryana Page 8 of about 2,499 results (1.431 seconds)

Jul 16 2014 (HC)

Naresh Vs. Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal-cum-labour Court Roht ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... labour court was not justified in rejecting the case of the petitioner. reliance was placed upon the statement of naresh kumar to submit that the workman had joined in 1985 and juniors were still in service. reliance is also placed upon the judgment of this court in cwp no.19837 of 2012 titled smt.maya devi vs. industrial ..... -pose of reference is to keep industrial peace in an establishment. the present reference is destructive to the industrial peace and defeats the very object and purpose of the act. bank was justified in thus moving the high court seeking an order to quash the reference in question. . 8. recently in assistant engineer, rajasthan state agriculture marketing ..... days, preceding his date of termination of service, as prescribed under section 25-b & 25-f of the act. it is categorical case of the department in the present case that petitioner-workman had worked from the year 1985 to 1995 and there were heavy breaks and details of his service were given. it was mentioned that in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2014 (HC)

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Vs. Gurcharan Kaur . . ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... basis of the pleadings of the parties framed the following issues:- 1. whether the notice under s.9 of the land acquisition act dated 30.9.1985 is illegal and void?. opp2 whether the award dated 4.11.1985 is illegal and valid?. vishal v201408.07 12:09 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document rs.no.2356 of ..... duly entered in the revenue record while sanctioning the mutation in the year 1974. the respondent-plaintiff averred that she was served with two notices dated 30.09.1985 and 04.11.1985 informing her that the award had been announced and possession of her house/property would be taken. she questioned those notices and sought a decree of permanent injunction ..... 1989 -4 3. whether the built up portion was exempted from scheme?. opp4 whether the suit is within time?. opd5 whether the plaintiff is estopped by his act and conduct to file .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2014 (HC)

Crm No. M-21987 of 2014 Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... .4.2013 (annexure p2), on accusation of having committed an offence punishable under section 22 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred as the ndps act .) by the police of police station makhu, district ferozepur.2. notice of the petition was issued to the state.3. after ..... society, containing specific provisions and special procedure. in order to carry out the purpose, aim and object of the ndps act, the central government has framed the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act & rules, 1985, narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances(regulation of controlled substances) order, 1993 and subsequent relevant rules and orders framed ..... , in case, the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioner-accused are accepted as such, then the very purpose, aim and object of the ndps act, would pale into insignificance and thereby inculcate & perpetuate injustice to the society at large. in this manner, the petitioner has violated the mandatory provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. S.S.Dalal Advocate for Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... remedy. in support of his contentions, learned counsel relies upon kuldip singh versus state of punjab 1994 plj268and nawab singh versus registrar coop. societies haryana 1985 r.r.r.536. per contra, learned state counsel, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and learned counsel for respondent no.5 jointly contended that ..... or equally efficacious remedy available, particularly in relation to election disputes. in the present case, under section 70(2) (c ) of the karnataka cooperative societies act, 1959 any dispute arising in connection with the election of a president, vice-president, chairman, vice-chairman, secretary, treasurer or kumar parveen 2014.07.28 17 ..... election petition challenging rejection of nomination paper is the efficacious remedy available under the '1984 act' and writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india cannot be entertained. the board of directors have already been elected. in this kumar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr.Baldev Singh Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 21b, 22 (a) and 27(a) of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred as the ndps act .) by the police of police station loharu, district bhiwani.2. notice of the petition was issued to the state.3. after ..... society, containing specific provisions and special procedure. in order to carry out the purpose, aim and object of the ndps act, the central government has framed the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act & rules, 1985, narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances(regulation of controlled substances) order, 1993 and subsequent relevant rules and orders framed ..... police officials apprehended the petitioner. in pursuance of the search, the prohibited narcotic drugs were recovered from his scooter without any permit or licence under ndps act. not only that, on the basis of his disclosure statement, his house/godown and shop premises were checked. after completion of the statutory/ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2014 (HC)

Parmod Kumar Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the chandigarh administration in the year 2009 remained un-successful. the sole grievance of the petitioner before the administrative tribunal in an application under section 19 of the administrative tribunal act, 1985 is that the objective type questions had wrong answer key which vitiate the entire selection process. the learned tribunal has reproduced the stand of the respondents in the written statement ..... review in the academic matters.the wisdom of the professionals alone is required to be respected. even if there is a mistake in the answer key, the same is applicable universally to all the candidates. therefore, we do not find that the petitioner has made out any case for review of the answer key by judicial intervention. dismissed. (hemant gupta) judge .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2014 (HC)

Crm No. M-21559 of 2014 Vs. Versus

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... .3.2013 (annexure p2), on accusation of having committed an offence punishable under section 22 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred as the ndps act .) by the police of police station lambi, district sri muktsar sahib (punjab).2. notice of the petition was issued to the ..... , containing specific provisions and special procedure. in order to carry out the purpose, aim and object of the ndps act, the central government has framed the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act & rules, 1985, narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances(regulation of controlled substances) order, 1993 and subsequent relevant rules and orders framed ..... in relation to manufactured drugs and preparations?. if so its effect. (ii)whether manufacturers, chemists, wholesale license holders under the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 possessing controlled substances and manufactured drugs/ prescription drugs are also required to comply with arvind kumar sharma 2014.07.15 19:07 i .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2014 (HC)

Challenging the Impugned Award the Appellants Have Took Vs. Smt. Malda ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... . no other evidence was led by the appellant state.13. so far as evidence produced by the landowners is concerned, sale deed (ex.p1) is of 4.1.1985 whereby 12 bighas of land was sold for `21,000/-.this land was located just adjacent to metalled kachwa main road. the acquired land is agricultural one and is located ..... 10.1.1996. the said issues are as under:- 1. what was the market value of the land at the time of notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894?. opp.2. whether the petitioners received compensation without any objection, if so, to what effect?. opr.3. relief.11. while considering oral as also documentary evidence, ..... 20,064 per acre for banjar qadim and gairmumkin kumaharan dhana and gairmumkin johar land.4. seeking enhancement of compensation the landowners preferred the petitions under section 18 of the act which were adjudicated by mohan brij 2014.07.16 19:19 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh rfa no.1219 of 1997 -2- the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2014 (HC)

The State of Punjab Through Land Acquisition Collector Syl Canal Proje ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... 2267 of 1990 titled gurdev singh (deceased) through his l.rs versus state of punjab. on perusal of this judgment, it transpires that vide notification dated 18.9.1985, land of the same village i.e. sotal, tehsil kharar, district ropar was acquired for construction of syl canal and compensation of the acquired land was determined by ..... to the accuracy and integrity of this document rfa no.2976 of 1992 -5- additional district judge, ropar pertaining to adjudication of reference under section 18 of the act of acquisition of land of this very village had been cited by the landowners, this was an important piece of evidence before the reference court. similarly, a ..... 1992.2. land for the construction of pamour distributary was acquired by the appellant-state pursuant to notification dated 12.3.1987 under the land acquisition act, 1894 (hereinafter mentioned as the act). it was of village sottal. land of the respondents in both these appeals had also been acquired. as per award dated 30.7.1987, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Arun Nehra Advocate Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... referred to the arbitrator. however, the contention of respondent no.1 was rejected and arbitrator was appointed to adjudicate the dispute between the parties, vide order dated 01.04.1985. according to the petitioner, this order was not challenged by respondent no.1 and accordingly, the competent authority, i.e.the engineer-in-chief appointed, shri p. ..... to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh cr nos.3271 and 3272 of 2000 (2) ***** application under section 20 of the arbitration act, 1940 (here-in-after referred to as the act .) before the sub judge 1st class, chandigarh, in which the objection was raised that the petitioner had already submitted final bill in terms of ..... his award on 17.05.1986. thereafter, the petitioner filed application under sections 14 and 17 of the act for making award as rule of the court in which respondent no.1 filed objection under section 30 of the act for setting aside the award, inter alia, on the ground that as per condition no.65, no further .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //