Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... district ropar, was sought to be acquired vide notification dated 13.9.1995 issued under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (for short, `the act') for syl canal. notification under section 6 of the act was issued on 24.9.1985. the land acquisition collector (for short, 'the collector') vide award dated 15.7.1986, assessed the market value of the acquired .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... 3.47 acres, situated in the revenue estate of village jharsa, tehsil and district gurgaon was acquired vide notification dated 14.6.1985, published on 2.7.1985, issued under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (for short, `the act') for construction of a road. the same was followed by notification dated 5.3.1986, published on 18.3.1986 issued under ..... section 6 of the act. the land acquisition collector (for short, `the collector') gave award of ` 93,440/- per acre. aggrieved against the same .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... , the entire evidence of both the parties reveal that there is entry in the column of cultivation in the name of parmanand who executed an affidavit dated 28.11.1985 in favour of the present plaintiff/appellant vide which he has surrendered the possession. the mutation in the name of defendant-gram panchayat for the firs.time came into ..... for the firs.time in the year 1992 and that too on the basis of notification issued by the state government, pursuant to the amendment in the vcl act vide act no.9 of 1992. the amendment was challenged before this court and the notification of 1992 was set aside by the full bench of this court in jai ..... notification whereby the land was reverted back to the proprietory body. as stated earlier, the gram panchayat has already initiated the proceedings under section 13-a of the pvcl act before the collector, ambala. thus, the plaintiff/appellant cannot be dispossessed from the suit land except in due cours.of law. the defendant-gram panchayat is at liberty .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... claiming that [i].the acquired land falls in the national capital region and can not be acquired or utilised without prior permission under the ncr planning board act, 1985; [ii].the notifications under sections 4 and 6 were not published in accordance with law; [iii].the fertile agricultural land is the only source of ..... region allows other towns of the ncr to develop within their carrying capacity and development potential as may be determined. it is averred that the 1985 act does not provide for approval of individual development plans of ncr cities or towns by the ncrpb. it is claimed that the industrial project of imt ..... object of regulated industrialization. [28].respondent no.5 land acquisition collector, sonepat in his separate written statement has maintained that the procedure prescribed under the 1894 act was meticulously followed to carry out the subject acquisition. [29].the chief coordinator planner [ncr]., town and country planning department, haryana too has filed written .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... without serving any notice upon him. the defendants-respondents filed written statement seriously contesting the claim of the plaintiff-appellant. the committee assessed house tax for the year 1985-86 after giving notice to the plaintiff but he did not raise any objection to the assessment and has paid house tax. in view of the provisions contained ..... the present form?. opd5 whether no notice has been given to m.c.?. opd6 whether the jurisdiction of this court is barred under section 86 of the municipal act?. opd7 relief. the trial court permitted the parties to lead evidence in support of their respective claims.after having heard counsel for the parties and appraisal of ..... of the learned trail court by holding that the jurisdiction of the civil court is barred in view of the provisions of sections 84 and 86 of the act. as the appellate court did not deal with the factual controvers.whether any notice was served upon the appellant before making assessment, the learned appellate court has .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... 16486 of 1994 2 (hereinafter referred to as `corporation') vide appointment letter dated 29.4.1982. services of the petitioners were regularized vide order dated 22.5.1985. petitioner was promoted as assistant manager (eltop) vide order dated 19/20.12.1989. petitioner was, unanimously, selected as president of the scheduled castes/scheduled tribes ..... appointment given to the said officers/officials, however, the retrenchment compensation be also paid as contemplated and provided under section 25(f) of the industrial disputes act, 1947. it may be stated here that the above said officers are the junior most persons in their respective cadre of service. it is further ordered ..... court. however, to harm him, the transfer order was withdrawn and he was illegally retrenched. he was not a workman within the definition of the industrial disputes act, 1947. impugned order dated 31.1.1992 annexure p16, had not been passed by the managing director and was illegal. therefore, the impugned order dated 31 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... year 1984-85. they were rehabilitated in bapu dham colony, sector 26, chandigarh, and thus, the demised premises was allotted to the original plaintiff rakha ram (since deceased) in december, 1985 in response to an application dated 29.10.1984 on leasehold and hire purchase basis. the total premium of the house was settled at `19,300 and the plaintiff was ..... payment of `30,000 and the plaintiff further executed irrevocable general power of attorney, will and affidavit and in view of the provisions of section 202 of the indian contract act, defendant ram lal had become sole and absolute owner of the house in dispute. it was also averred that the plaintiff had played a fraud with the defendants by withdrawing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... no.2267 of 2013 -7- supreme court cases 788 and smt. gian devi anand versus jeevan kumar 1985(1) rcr (rent) 459 (sc). all these and earlier issues are triable by the rent controller and thus leave to contest the petition was rightly granted to the ..... on the other hand, has urged that existence of relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties is sine qua non for maintainability of the eviction petition under the act. support has been sought from tribhuvanshankar versus amrutlal (2014) 2 yag dutt 2014.08.06 15:27 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cr ..... cor in amritsar in the premises in dispute.3. the said petition was challenged by the respondent-tenant by way of filing an application under section 18-a of the act seeking leave to contest the ejectment petition, wherein following objections were taken: (i) non-existence of relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties; (ii) lease by smt .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... of natural justice and whether before taking a policy decision, it was imperative for the petitioners to be heard?.14. accordingly, this court held that the university act came into force one year after the judgment of the full bench and respondent no.1 had taken a decision without taking into consideration the fact of the ..... that on the notification of the adesh university act, 2012 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.12135 of 2014 & other connected cases -10- whether the petitioners could seek autonomy for ..... & haryana 470 and therefore, that decision was justified, which was subject matter of challenge. two issues were framed by this court regarding the autonomy which the university sought under the university act and whether the decision was violative of the principles of natural justice. the said issues read as under: sailesh ranjan 2014.08.01 10:28 (i) .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... sentence dated 18/19.4.2007 passed by learned special judge, ferozepur, whereby, they have been convicted for offence punishable under section 18 (c) of ndps act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the act ) and sentenced to undergo ri for a period of five years each and to pay a fine of ` 50000/- each with default clause. briefly, ..... coupled with requisite mental elements i.e.conscious possession is proved. custody of the contraband without being aware about the nature of such possession, the provisions of ndps act are not attracted. the word conscious means awareness about a particular fact and it is a state of mind which is deliberate or intended as has been ..... court, copies of necessary documents, as required under section 207 cr.p.c., were supplied to them and thereafter they were chargesheeted under section 18 of the act, to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. the prosecution in order to prove its case examined total five witnesses. thereafter, statements of accused under .....
Tag this Judgment!