Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 14 directors Court: karnataka Page 99 of about 3,294 results (0.089 seconds)

Dec 22 2006 (HC)

The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment) Special Range-6 Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2007)209CTR(Kar)62; [2007]293ITR451(KAR); [2007]293ITR451(Karn)

..... , had engaged m/s accumulator fabrics as their sole selling and canvassing agent for marketing their product throughout india in terms of an agreement dtd 1-7-1985. thereafter in the light of expiry of the earlier agreement, they were desirous of renewing the appointment of the aforesaid agent, for a further period of ..... rs. 3,90,530/- the turnover of the previous assessment year. the tribunal had considered the three condition* specified in section 40a(2)(a) of the act while confirming the order of the assistant commissioner regarding the excessiveness or unreasonableness of the remuneration and commission alleged to have been paid by the assessee to his ..... the respondent-assessee' a case, in relation to the assessment year 1991-92, 1992-93, the commissioner took up revisional proceedings under section 263 of the act on the ground that the assessments made by the assessing authority were erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue, in that, the assessing authority had erroneously .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 2011 (HC)

Sri. Prabhulingappa H M. Son of MunichendragowdA. Vs. the Divisional C ...

Court : Karnataka

..... name of the workman, was credible evidence. the defence of the workman that the head master examined had no! issued the transfer certificate in the year 1985, was held to be inconsequential in view of the original admission register produced by the head master which did not disclose the name of the workman as having ..... and examined the award impugned, the following two questions arise for decisions making: "i. whether the labour court was not justified in invoking section 11a of the act entitling the workman to equitable consideration and relief as contended by the employer corporation? 1. whether in the facts and circumstances the labour court was justified in ..... dated 21.1.2006 of the state government referring the industrial dispute for adjudication before the iii addl. labour court. bangalore, under the industrial disputes act, 1947 (for short "act"), registered as ref.no 14/06. in the premise of pleadings of parties. the labour conn trained an additional issue over the validity of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 1992 (HC)

Babu Rao Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT(Cri)581; 1993CriLJ2310; ILR1992KAR3804; 1992(4)KarLJ563

..... appellant babu rao has been convicted by the special judge, metropolitan area, bangalore city under section 20(b) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ndps act) and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of rs. 50,000/- or in default to suffer rigorous ..... be said that they should have reduced the information received from their informant into writing and then proceeded to the place of occurrence. section 43 of the act does not contemplate taking down in writing the information given by any person relating to an offence punishable under chapter iv. such a requirement is contemplated ..... the limits of their respective jurisdiction, the power of entry, search, seizure, detention and arrest without warrant between sunset and sunrise exercisable under s. 42 of ndps act. by that notification, the proviso of sub-section (1) of s. 42 are also conferred on the said officers. police inspector patil who was the in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 1992 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sangam Motels (P.) Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1993]199ITR257(KAR); [1993]199ITR257(Karn)

..... the profits had been transferred to the balance-sheet as commercial profits. this decision is clearly distinguishable on facts. 14. somasundaram p. ltd. v. cit : [1985]152itr664(kar) is a decision of this court. the receipts were in fact omitted from the books of account, which were subsequently treated as part of the available ..... not bearing while considering the reasonableness of the non-declaration of dividend during the previous year. in fact, there is not finding at all that the assessee acted unreasonably in not distributing any dividend during the relevant year in question. 21. in the result, we answer the question in the affirmative and against the ..... ) may be relevant, it cannot have any relevancy while considering the 'smallness of profit' under section 104(2). the second condition, while applying section 104 of the act, would still be governed by the concepts of 'commercial profits' and 'capital return' stated by the supreme court in bipinchandra maganlal and co.'s case : [1961] .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 1993 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Balawwa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : II(1993)ACC463; 1993ACJ815; ILR1993KAR1843; 1993(2)KarLJ406; (1994)ILLJ433Kant

..... the employer is liable to pay compensation under section 3 read with section 4 of the workmen's compensation act.see: (1) m/s. mackinnon mackenzie & co (p) ltd. v. ritafernandiz, 1959 acj 419 (sc)(2) devshi bhanji khona v. mary burno, 1985(2) llj 70 (kerala);(3) united india insurance co. ltd. v. yasodhara amma, 1990(1) llj ..... that the petitioner had nowhere pleaded that her husband died as a result of 'heart-attack'. while dealing with the claims for compensation under the workmen's compensation act, we should not apply the principles of pleadings strictly.13. in the present case, though the petitioner had not specifically alleged that lagma died of heart-attack she ..... between the death of the employee and the use of the vehicle. hence the insurance company is liable to pay the compensation payable under the workmen's compensation act. hence there are no good grounds to interfere with the order of the commissioner directing the insurer to pay the compensation.30. coming to the claim of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2008 (HC)

A. Sathyanarayan S/O Suryanarayan Rep. by His G.P.A. Holder, Sri. A.S. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3793; 2008(5)KarLJ622; ILR2008(2)Kar2650; 2008(3)KCCR1930; 2008(5)AIRKarR86; AIR2008NOC2544; 2008(4)CivilLJ592

..... 3. the facts which are common to all the complaints filed before the trial court under section 138 of the negotiable imtruments act ('n.i act' for short) are to the effect that, under a memorandum of agreement entered into between one bhakthavatsalam and manjunath being the ..... 1 scc 258(e) (2007) 5 scc 264(f) 2007(1) scj 47(g) 2007 air scw 7008(h) air 2005 sc 439(i) 1985(2) kar.l.j. 189(j) 1999 crl.l.j. 2092(k) 2005(2) alt 607(l) 2007(5) kar.l.j. 288(m) ..... competent to file the complaint and give evidence on behalf of each of the complainants?(iii) whether section 138 of the n.i. act is not attracted in respect of the cheques, which were returned with the endorsement 'account closed and transferred to shanthi nagar branch'?(iv ..... the existing legal liability or debt of the respondent. it is submitted that the presumption under section 139 of the n.i. act cannot be pressed into service with regard to the requirement of the complainant proving the existence of legally recoverable debt. in this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2004 (HC)

D. Parthasarathy Vs. Vinayaprabha

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2004Kant348; I(2005)DMC372

..... the grant or refusal to dissolve a marriage by a decree of divorce depends on the facts and circumstances of the case and there are no general principles of universal application. 25. in the light of the facts of this case what is required to be seen is whether the decree for restitution of conjugal rights is, in ..... . the remedy of the restitution of conjugal rights is predominantly aimed at cohabitation and consortium. the supreme court in the case of saroj rani v. sudarshan kumar, : [1985]1scr303 , considering the rights of the parties in a decree of restitution of conjugal rights observed thus :'15. in india it may be borne in mind that conjugal rights ..... the family court, the respondent-wife, lodged a complaint of dowry harassment by the appellant and his elder brother, thereafter, filed a petition under section 9 of the act for restitution of conjugal rights in m. c. no. 586/96. the family court having clubbed both the matrimonial cases, tried them together, dismissed the petition of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1990 (HC)

Seethalakshmi Hall Flour Mills Ltd. Vs. Bangalore Development Authorit ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR4163; 1990(3)KarLJ255

..... j, k, l, m and n, he demanded possession. they are dated 24-6-1983, 3-12-1983, 26-8-1984, 20-2-1985 and 3-4-1986 respectively. at this stage, respondent-2 was informed as follows:'adm/a3/17/b/i.s.11/86-87 office of the ..... the appellant is also not legally valid in so far as it is clearly in violation of section 10 of the bangalore development authority act since the execution of the agreement must be by the secretary for the b.d.a. the secretary of the b.d.a. ..... agreement executed in favour of the appellant was also not valid in view of the statutory provision contained under section 10(3) of the act. as regards delay, he held that though possession was demanded by respondent-2 herein as early as 21-1-1981, nothing had been done ..... a request for allotment, that came to be made in its favour. the exemption under section 20 of the urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, had also been obtained on 24-4-1983 in furtherance of allotment. two bore wells have also been sunk. the area has been enclosed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2005 (HC)

impact Polytechnic and ors. Vs. All India Council for Technical Educat ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR548; 2006(1)KarLJ396

..... cannot be allowed to take the examination. reliance is placed on the decision of the apex court in the case of medical council of india v. rajiv gandhi university of health sciences, bangalore and ors. : (2004)6scc76 .8. i have carefully considered the arguments made at the bar and perused the materials placed on ..... application for extension of approval to continue the courses for the academic year 2005-2006 within the period prescribed. the expert committee constituted under the aicte act was deputed to inspect the petitioner's institution. the said committee inspected the petitioner's institution and submitted a report to the state level committee pointing ..... the institution has been permitted to function on the basis of yearly permission granted by the aicte as required under the all india council for technical education act, 1987 and the grant of approval for starting new technical institutions, introduction of courses or programmes and approval of intake capacity of seats for courses or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2001 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sudharshan Silks and Sarees

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2001)171CTR(Kar)256; ILR2002KAR82; [2002]253ITR145(KAR); [2002]253ITR145(Karn); [2002]120TAXMAN152(Kar)

..... in the name and style of sudarshan silk and sarees and sudarshan silks. assessments for sudarshan silk and sarees were completed for the assessment years 1984-85, 1985-86 and 1986-87 on different dates, on the basis of the returns filed by the said assessee. the assessment of sudarshan silks was similarly completed for ..... upon its own imagination and imports facts and circumstances not apparent from the record or bases its conclusions on mere conjectures or surmises or where no person judicially acting and properly instructed as to the relevant law could have come to the determination reached. in all such cases the findings arrived at are vitiated.' 10. ..... the basis whereof the income-tax officer completed the reassessment proceedings. a notice was thereafter issued to the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the income-tax act, 1961, for concealment. the assessee contended that inasmuch as he had filed the revised return voluntarily and that the assessment had been completed on the basis of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //