Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 10 chief rector Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka dharwad Page 7 of about 66 results (0.091 seconds)

Dr (Ms) B K Naik Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... pensionary benefits by considering non-grant period. the government and whereas, in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 145 of the karnataka education act, 1983 the karnataka pre-university education (academic, registration, administration and grant-in-aid etc.) rules, 2006. the sub-rule (2) and (3) of rule 21 of the said rules ..... object of an explanation to a statutory provision has been culled out from the earlier judicial decisions and succinctly restated in s.sundaram pillai v. v.r.pattabiraman - (1985) 1 scc591 legislative its from 53. thus, to explain the meaning and a conspectus the authorities referred to above, it is manifest that the object of an explanation ..... are some what similar to facts obtained in the instant case. gvk girls high school was admitted to grant-in-aid with effect from 01.09.1985 as per the andhra pradesh education act. the arrears of salary to the head mistress and staff of the school were not paid. as such, :347. : a writ petition came .....

Visvesvarayya Technological University Vs. The Chancellor

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... his power under section 11(1) & (2) of the 3 wa10014/2015 visvesvaraya technological university act, 1994, (for short, the act ).3. the main contention of the writ petitioner-university was, that neither section 11 nor any other provision in the act conferred any power on the chancellor to appoint such a committee and that the only power as ..... issue such notification. the expression no suit, prosecution or other proceeding shall lie against any officer or other employee of the university for any act done or purported to be done under the act or the statutes or regulations , can only mean that such prosecution 14 wa10014/2015 or proceeding cannot be initiated against any ..... to the facts of the case to urge that the notification issued by the chancellor cannot be challenged because chancellor being an officer of the university, any act done by way of issuing the 12 wa10014/2015 impugned notification cannot be challenged without the previous sanction of the executive council?. 14. the learned .....

Dharani and Another Vs. the State of Karnataka, by Khade Bazar Sub-dn ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and 2 have committed offences punishable under sections 20(b)(ii)(c), 21(c) and 22(c) of the n.d.p.s.act, 1985. 4. after the accused were secured, the prosecution in order to prove the case has examined in all 16 witnesses and got marked ..... rs.3,08,000/-, without any permit or licence, thereby they have contravened section 8(c) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 and it is also further alleged that they were illegally transporting the same form bombay to goa via belgaum, for the purpose selling them ..... ri for three years and to pay fine of rs.10,000/- for the offence punishable under section 22 of the n.d.p.s. act, 1985, with default clauses. 3. it is the case of the prosecution that on 30/12/2007, at about 10.15am. near the second ..... .40/2008, convicting the accused of the offences punishable under section 21 r/w section 8(c) of the n.d.p.s. act, 1985, and sentencing each of them to undergo ri for 10 years and to pay fine of rs.50,000/- each for the offence punishable .....

The Commissioner of Income Tax and Another Vs. Mrs. B. Sumangaladevi

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... the board circular dt.14.7.1994, which has classified that the single panel circuit breakers are classifiable under chapter 8537 has retrospective effect? under the central excise tariff act, 1985 and the rules, 1944, the board had issued a circular dated 14.7.1994 with regard to classification of goods. hence the apex court in the above said ..... to the assessee; and (iv) that the tribunal grossly erred in confirming the order of the commissioner of income tax (appeals) as there is no provision under the act to implement the directions given by the commissioner of income tax in his order. 4. on service of notice in this appeal, the respondent/assessee entered appearance through ..... approached the itat. thus, the revenue is before this court. 3. the revenue has urged the following grounds: (i) that as per section 132b of the act, the seized money shall be applied by the assessing authority for discharge of liability of the assessee from who the money is seized and if there is any excess amount .....

Dr. Shivayogeppa B. Hinchigeri Vs. the Chancellor Karnataka University ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... 1. this writ petition raises a short, but important question regarding the appointment of a vice-chancellor of a university under the provisions of the karnataka universities act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the act, for the sake of brevity). the petitioner has assailed the notification dated 18.10.2010 issued by the first ..... therefore, point no. 1 is answered in the affirmative. 24. point no. 2 : the karnataka state universities act, 2000 has replaced the 1976 act. chapter 3 of the said act deals with the officers of the university. section 11 mentions, inter alia, the following officers of the university i.e., (a) the chancellor . (b) the pro chancellor . (c) the vice ..... the expression concurrence of the state government in sub-section (4) of section 14, he submitted that originally the karnataka university act, 1949 was applicable to the respondent university under which, section 10 prescribed the procedure for the appointment of vice-chancellor by way of an election. the said .....

Mahadevappa and Others Vs. Chikkappa Shivappa Kali and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Reported in : 2012(3)KCCR1897

..... findings on the above issues by the trial court resulting in dismissal of the suit, the aggrieved plaintiff appealed to the lower appellate court in ra no.60 of 1985. 7. the appellate court dismissed the appeal finding no scope for reversal of the judgment and decree of the trial court as per its judgment and decree dated 23 ..... who puts forth a special defence particularly as it was the 2nd defendant who sought to rely upon the exception to clause (b) of section 19 of the specific relief act, 1963 which reads as under: "19. relief against parties and persons claiming under them by subsequent title.- except as otherwise provided by this chapter, specific performance of a ..... first defendant was avoiding to perform his part of the contract. however, issue no.5 as to whether first defendant proves the agreement was a result of fraudulent act on the part of the plaintiff against the first defendant by manipulating a receipt issued in favour of the plaintiff for having received a sum of rs.500/- by .....