Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... of justice and equity; issue writ in the nature of mandamus and issue appropriate directions to the respondents no.1,3 to7to quantify and pay compensation under section20of the slum act in respect of06acres18guntas15annas in sy.no.37/3a of nekar nagar, ayodhya village (v) at the earliest, in the interest of justice and equity; alternatively, direct the respondents ..... the said land have executed sale agreement in favour of the hubballi sightless labourers association represented by its secretary on 18.03.1985. the same was duly registered before the concerned sub-registrar office on 19.03.1985. in furtherance of the said sale agreement a general power of attorney came to be executed by the owners of the land ..... on 16.04.1985. the same is also registered on the said date by the concerned sub- registrar office. the copies of the agreement of sale and general power of attorney are .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... of justice and equity; issue writ in the nature of mandamus and issue appropriate directions to the respondents no.1,3 to7to quantify and pay compensation under section20of the slum act in respect of06acres18guntas15annas in sy.no.37/3a of nekar nagar, ayodhya village (v) at the earliest, in the interest of justice and equity; alternatively, direct the respondents ..... the said land have executed sale agreement in favour of the hubballi sightless labourers association represented by its secretary on 18.03.1985. the same was duly registered before the concerned sub-registrar office on 19.03.1985. in furtherance of the said sale agreement a general power of attorney came to be executed by the owners of the land ..... on 16.04.1985. the same is also registered on the said date by the concerned sub- registrar office. the copies of the agreement of sale and general power of attorney are .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... is whether it is open to the state government to appoint teachers on an ad hoc basis at the commencement of an academic year and terminate their services before 11 (1985) 4 scc43correct vide chamber order dated:23.08.2024 - 46 - nc:2024. khc-d:10643 wp no.102060 of 2024 the commencement of the next summer vacation, or earlier, to ..... holding it to be 'archaic', 'primitive' and of 'baneful nature'. the system, which is nothing but an improved version of bonded-labour, is sought to be abolished by the act. the act is an important piece of social legislation for the welfare of labourers and has to be liberally construed. (c) in the case of secretary, h.s.e.b. vs. suresh ..... .,1 (ix) r.k. panda and ors. vs. steel authority of india and ors.2; (x) all india food and allied workers union vs. delhi state civil suppliers corporation3 1 1985 scc (1) 630 2 (1994) 5 scc304- 15 - nc:2024. khc-d:10643 wp no.102060 of 2024 (xi) sri. raman s/o.minichinnappa and ors. vs. the aeronautical development .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... pontiff has categorically stated that he was under a mistaken belief that the brindavana was that of shri. raghuvarya teertharu. this would indicate and categorically establish that even until 1985 both the pontiff of shri. raghavendra swamy mutt and shri. raghavendra swamy mutt were of the opinion - 167 - nc:2024. khc-d:7502 wp no.103982 of ..... which can be so ascertained on the basis of the documents produced. the dispute having been raised as regards established facts of over centuries only recently in the year 1985, the established facts prior to the dispute being that the brindavana belonged to shri raghuvarya teertharu, this aspect would have to be taken into - 106 - nc:2024 ..... swamy mutt and respondents 6 to 15 to be true, this alleged mistaken belief having been acted upon for last 400 and more years and the aradhana being performed as that of shri raghuvarya teertharu, it is only in the year 1985 that nirupa was issued just prior to the death of peetadhipati, this cannot be a ground .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... pontiff has categorically stated that he was under a mistaken belief that the brindavana was that of shri. raghuvarya teertharu. this would indicate and categorically establish that even until 1985 both the pontiff of shri. raghavendra swamy mutt and shri. raghavendra swamy mutt were of the opinion - 167 - nc:2024. khc-d:7502 wp no.103982 of ..... which can be so ascertained on the basis of the documents produced. the dispute having been raised as regards established facts of over centuries only recently in the year 1985, the established facts prior to the dispute being that the brindavana belonged to shri raghuvarya teertharu, this aspect would have to be taken into - 106 - nc:2024 ..... swamy mutt and respondents 6 to 15 to be true, this alleged mistaken belief having been acted upon for last 400 and more years and the aradhana being performed as that of shri raghuvarya teertharu, it is only in the year 1985 that nirupa was issued just prior to the death of peetadhipati, this cannot be a ground .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... grievance, as it directly impacts their legal rights and obligations under the statute. crucially, the petitioner's challenge to this specific provision of the kteg act represents a fundamental aspect of their legal argument. without 48 addressing and resolving this challenge, any appeal before the statutory authorities would lack a substantive ..... taking cognizance of 1992 amendment could not have initiated reassessment process.33. given this statutory mandate under the charging section 3(1) of the kteg act, any subsequent attempt by the assessing officer to revise the assessment and base it on the prevailing market price of the goods would deviate from ..... are not violative of clarifications issued by the commissioner of commercial tax. learned advocate general would point that the assessing authority had no opportunity to act as per the clarifications issued by the commissioner of commercial taxes. while seriously contesting the petitioner s claim that reassessment is purely based on change .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... grievance, as it directly impacts their legal rights and obligations under the statute. crucially, the petitioner's challenge to this specific provision of the kteg act represents a fundamental aspect of their legal argument. without 48 addressing and resolving this challenge, any appeal before the statutory authorities would lack a substantive ..... taking cognizance of 1992 amendment could not have initiated reassessment process.33. given this statutory mandate under the charging section 3(1) of the kteg act, any subsequent attempt by the assessing officer to revise the assessment and base it on the prevailing market price of the goods would deviate from ..... are not violative of clarifications issued by the commissioner of commercial tax. learned advocate general would point that the assessing authority had no opportunity to act as per the clarifications issued by the commissioner of commercial taxes. while seriously contesting the petitioner s claim that reassessment is purely based on change .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... grievance, as it directly impacts their legal rights and obligations under the statute. crucially, the petitioner's challenge to this specific provision of the kteg act represents a fundamental aspect of their legal argument. without 48 addressing and resolving this challenge, any appeal before the statutory authorities would lack a substantive ..... taking cognizance of 1992 amendment could not have initiated reassessment process.33. given this statutory mandate under the charging section 3(1) of the kteg act, any subsequent attempt by the assessing officer to revise the assessment and base it on the prevailing market price of the goods would deviate from ..... are not violative of clarifications issued by the commissioner of commercial tax. learned advocate general would point that the assessing authority had no opportunity to act as per the clarifications issued by the commissioner of commercial taxes. while seriously contesting the petitioner s claim that reassessment is purely based on change .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... grievance, as it directly impacts their legal rights and obligations under the statute. crucially, the petitioner's challenge to this specific provision of the kteg act represents a fundamental aspect of their legal argument. without 48 addressing and resolving this challenge, any appeal before the statutory authorities would lack a substantive ..... taking cognizance of 1992 amendment could not have initiated reassessment process.33. given this statutory mandate under the charging section 3(1) of the kteg act, any subsequent attempt by the assessing officer to revise the assessment and base it on the prevailing market price of the goods would deviate from ..... are not violative of clarifications issued by the commissioner of commercial tax. learned advocate general would point that the assessing authority had no opportunity to act as per the clarifications issued by the commissioner of commercial taxes. while seriously contesting the petitioner s claim that reassessment is purely based on change .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH R DATED THIS THE11H DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.101424 OF2023(S-REG) C/W WRIT PETITION No.105056 OF2022(S-RES) WRIT PETITION No.100735 OF2023(S-REG) WRIT PETITION No.101408 OF2023(S-REG) WRIT PETITION No.101413 OF2023(S-REG) WRIT PETITION No.101429 OF2023(S-REG) WRIT PETITION No.101431 OF2023(S-REG) IN WRIT PETITION No.101424 OF2023 BETWEEN: RAGHAVENDRA S/O SRINIVAS DESHPANDE AGED ABOUT54YEARS OCC: TEACHER N.A.MUTHANNA MEMORIAL POLICE CHILDRENS RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL DHARWAD R/O PLOT No.215, GYNABA LAYOUT NEAR BANASHREE NAGAR D.N.KOPPA, DHARWAD 580 001. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJA RAGHAVENDRA NAIK, ADVOCATE AND SMT. SOUMYA S.GUJAMAGADI, ADVOCATE) 2 AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY POLICE SERVICE-1 DEPARTMENT OF HOME VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU 560 001. 2 . THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CHIEF OFFICE NRUPATUNGA ROAD BENGALURU 560 001. 3 . N.A.M...
Tag this Judgment!