Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 10 chief rector Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Page 7 of about 3,198 results (2.223 seconds)

Rev. Father W. Proost and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1969SC465; 1968(0)KLT878(SC); [1969]2SCR73

..... of service or reduction in rank of teachers or take other disciplinary measures subject only to the approval of the commission and the syndicate of the university'. simultaneously the magadh university act, 1961 was also similarly amended. 7. the petitioners, therefore, claim the protection of section 48-b and submit that as an affiliated college established ..... a. 6. while this petition was pending in this court, the governor of bihar promulgated an ordinance on july 16, 1968. it amended the bihar state universities act, 1960 by inserting section 48-b after section 48-a. the new section read :'48-b. college established and administered by a minority entitled to make ..... to administer it, a constitutional right guaranteed to minorities by article 30. the petitioners' complaint is that the bihar legislature passed an amending act and introduced in the bihar universities act section 48-a to come into force from march 1, 1962, which deprives them of this protection and is, therefore, ultra vires. .....

Mahadeo Vs. Shantibhai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1970(0)BLJR721; [1969]2SCR422

..... , an agreement was entered into on march 16, 1959 between the governor of madhya pradesh and vikram university ujjain, a body corporate formed under section 3 of the madhya bharat vikram university act, 1955, regarding certain terms under which the governor had offered to transfer to the university the management of the madhav college, together with its buildings and premises etc. for a period ..... have come to an end in 1964 when he attained the ace of superannuation. it was really for the university to ignore the fact that he had been superannuated in 1964 and continue him in service, but that would be an act of the university and not of the government. there is room for doubt as to whether in the circumstances mentioned above .....

Voleti Venkatarama Rao Vs. Kesapragada Bhaskara Rao and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1969SC1359; (1969)2SCC79; [1970]1SCR301

..... stands to reason that after a very long term of years, and a variety of transactions of open life and conduct upon the footing that the adoption was a valid act, the burden must rest heavily upon him who challenges its validity,' see also venkataseetarama chandra row v. kanchu marthi raju the presumption in this case is very heavy considering that ..... on october 2, 1952. during his life time rajeswararao was recognised by every member of the family as the adopted son of bhaskara rao. he was registered as karnam and acted as such till his death. under ex. b-12 dated november 19, 1937 the plaintiff's mother kamappa purchased a property from rajeswara rao wherein he was described as the .....

Management of Rashtradoot, Jaipur Vs. Rajasthan Working Journalist Uni ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1970(20)FLR1]; (1970)ILLJ58SC; (1971)3SCC96; 1969()WLN63

..... journalist as defined in section 2(f) of the working journalists (conditions of service and miscellaneous provisions) act 45 of 1955 (here-after called the act).2. the working journalists of the rashtradoot, a dally newspaper, submitted in may 1985, a memorandum to sri hazari lal sharma, its proprietor, complaining, inter alia, that the interim ..... relief awarded by the second wage board of the working journalists had not been implemented by the management. the second wage board, it may be pointed out, had been constituted by the government of india under the act ..... his services were terminated on 18 february 1967. this resulted in an application to the labour court by dinesh khare under section 33a of the industrial disputes act. the rashtradoot working journalists' union, it appears, did not feel happy over the action of the management against khare and tried to persuade the management to .....

Zuber Vs. Allen

Court : US Supreme Court

..... handling of milk in the greater boston, massachusetts, marketing area, nov. 3, 1933-june 1, 1946 (unpublished dissertation on file with department of agriculture and harvard university). [ footnote 7 ] license 38 for the boston area provided more favorable bases for the nearby producers. see barnhart, supra, n 6, at 95-96. [ ..... handler. [ footnote 18 ] the general language of the committee report indicating that congress intended to carry forward the basic regulatory approach adopted under the 1933 act, following the precedent of the 1920's, is stressed by the dissent to this opinion. this committee language, it is argued, reinforces the continuity ..... [ footnote 7 ] the viability of the licensing scheme was jeopardized, however, by judicial decisions disapproving a similarly broad delegation of power under the national industrial recovery act provisions, 48 stat. 195. schechter poultry corp. v. united states, 295 u. s. 495 (1935). with its agricultural marketing program resting on quicksand, .....

M.D. Shukla and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1971SC117; (1970)GLR1018; (1970)0GLR100; (1970)1SCC419; [1970]3SCR515

..... promotion.(2) to be eligible for appointment by nomination a candidate must :-(i) hold a degree in arts, law, science, agriculture or commerce of a recognised university or possess an equivalent qualification;(ii) have attained the age of 18 years; and(iii) not have attained the age of 30 years in the case of ..... 309 of the constitution cannot take away the statutory right vested in the personnel of the former saurashtra and kutch states which they acquired under the states reorganisation act, 1956, to hold posts in the new state which were equivalent and on terms which were not, unless the previous approval of the central government was ..... did not consider whether the saurashtra and kutch states secretariat personnel had 'any rights flowing on account of absorption and integration of service under the states reorganisation act, 1956 or the allocated government servants' rules, 1957.' but the high court held that since the impugned order purported to amalgamate the former saurashtra and kutch .....

Rustom Cavasjee Cooper Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC564; [1970]40CompCas325(SC); (1970)1SCC248; [1970]3SCR530

..... of india act, 1955, state financial corporation act, 1951, university grants commission act, 1956 life insurance act, 1956, deposit insurance act, 1961, national cooperative development corporation act, 1962, agricultural refinance corporation act, 1963 and state agricultural credit corporations act, 1968. ..... of corporations, whether trading or not, with objects not confined to one state, but not including universities': entry 44 list i.31. the states have exclusive legislative authority with respect to the following ..... there are english statutes which contain similar provisions of exercise of power or directions by the government in regard to the affairs of the undertakings covered by the statutes. these are the bank of england act .....

Ganga Prasad and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC989; 1970CriLJ895; (1970)3SCC92

..... register and other relevant papers. he obtained a statement in writing ex. 1 from the appellant ganga prasad of the food-grains received by him on august 9, 1985. he had the transactions verified by his supply inspector. at his direction ganga prasad also made out another list giving full details of all the food grains of ..... by special leave from an order of the high court of patna dismissing in limine the appellants application for challenging their conviction under section 7 of the essential commodities act and sentence of a fine of rs. 500/- on each or la default simple imprisonment of six months.2. the fads are as follows, on 9th august ..... with contravention of clause 7 of the bihar food grains licensing order 1963 promulgated under section. 3 of the essential commodities act, 1955 and triable summarily under section 12-a of lie essential commodities act leaving out of account certain minor irregularities alleged to have been committed by them the gravamen of the charge was that the .....

Ram Murti Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC1029; 1970CriLJ991; (1970)72PLR1000; (1970)3SCC21

..... are far from satisfied that there is any trustworthy evidence on the record on which the conclusion that satnam kaur, prosecutrix, was under 18 years of age in march, 1985 am safely be founded.8. this takes us to the question whether satnam kaur was compelled or induced by deceitful means to accompany the appellant the high court has dealt ..... the high court having acquitted the appellant for an offence under section 876, indian penal code because the prosecutrix appeared to be a consenting party not only to the impugned acts of sexual intercourse in question but even on earlier occasions, it was, in our opinion, a fit case in which that court should have examined the question of her ..... 25th septembers, 1949, with the aid of bhagwanti dai. this entry was made in the register on 27th september, 1949. there is evidence on the record that bhagwanti was acting as a dai at the time of the birth of satnam kaur. moreover it is also amply clear from the statements of hans raj and his wife that she was .....

Adickes Vs. S. H. Kress and Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... self-interest, ambition and vanity, set into play by a special social mechanism into which the obligatory actions are framed." this concept of "custom" is, i think, universal, and as relevant here as elsewhere. it makes apparent that our problem under 42 u.s.c. 1983 does not make our sole aim the search for "state ..... harris, 106 u. s. 629 (1883), the court invalidated the criminal provision of 2 of the page 398 u. s. 207 ku klux klan act, the criminal analogue to 1985(3), on the ground that congress was not authorized by 5 of the fourteenth amendment to prohibit interference by private persons with the exercise of fourteenth amendment rights ..... the section to conspiracies involving state action, in order to sustain its constitutionality. this limiting construction necessarily carried over to 1986, whose scope is keyed to that of 1985. section 241 of 18 u.s.c. fared little better. that statute, as indicated, deals generally with conspiracies to interfere with the exercise of federal rights. .....