Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 10 chief rector Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Page 6 of about 3,198 results (0.782 seconds)

B. Shama Rao Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1480; [1967]2SCR650; [1967]20STC215(SC)

..... proceedings being taken against him under the madras general sales tax act, 1959 (act 1 of 1959) hereinafter referred to as "the madras act") as applied to pondicherry by the pondicherry general sales tax act, 1956 (act no. 10 of 1965) (hereinafter referred to as "the principal act"). pondicherry was a french possession, but was transferred to the suzeranity of ..... and, on its basis, we should hold that the delegation of its legislative power, amounting to authorisation to the pondicherry government to choose whether the madras, act should come into force in pondicherry unamended or as subse- quently amended, was valid. apart from the fact that attempt was made to cast doubt ..... void, because it had been made by the legislature in excess of its: legislative powers.. in the present case the principal act was clearly, within the competence, of the pondicherry legislature- and is being attacked as void only on the ground that it was defective inasmuch as it contained excessive delegation of .....

Baltimore and Ohio R. Co. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... remove entirely the planning and policy function of the commission with respect to rail consolidations. indeed, such a position ignores the mandate of the preamble to the act of 1940, which provides that its provisions shall be administered with a view to "promote . . . adequate, economical, and efficient service and foster sound ..... plan itself was to be designed to achieve limited, primarily financial goals. in contrast, as we have seen, the purposes sought through consolidation under the 1940 act are wide-ranging, and the public interest includes consideration of all factors relating to the national transportation page 386 u. s. 427 policy. financial manipulation ..... of the pennsylvania and the new york central railroads, the largest and third largest railroads in the northeast, pursuant to 5(2) of the interstate commerce act. the icc found that the merger might divert substantial traffic from the erie-lackawanna, delaware and hudson, and boston and maine railroads, three smaller carriers .....

Bhajan Singh Hardit Singh and Co., Delhi Vs. Karson Agency (India) and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the contract, the appellant-plaintiff had a right to resell the goods and recover the shortfall, if any, under section 54(2) of the sale of goods act, that the act of refusal by the respondents to take delivery did not give rise to a cause of action until a specific injury by way of shortfall actually resulted, that ..... was thus barred by time. dealing with this contention, the learned judges observed that the aforesaid argument did not take sufficient account of section 24 of the indian limitation act. after extracting section 24, the learned judges proceeded to observe as follows:- 'a breach in the abstract would not be sufficient, in our opinion, to provide a foothold ..... of unascertained goods, no property in the goods is transferred to the buyer unless and until the goods are ascertained. section 23(1) of the sale of goods act provides that - 'where there is a contract for the sale of unascertained or future goods by description and goods of that description and in a deliverable state are .....

Rajasthan State Electricity Board, Jaipur Vs. Mohan Lal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1857; [1971(21)FLR59]; (1968)ILLJ257SC; [1967]3SCR377

..... by the state including those vested with the duty to make decisions in order to implement those laws. ' in k. s. ramamurthi reddiar v. the chief commissioner, pondicherry and another : [1964]1scr656 , this court, dealing with art. 12, held : 'further, all local or other authorities within the territory of india include all ..... exercising governmental functions. they would not include persons natural or juristic who cannot be regarded as instrumentalities of the government. the university of madras is a body corporate created by madras act vii of 1923. it is not charged with the execution of any governmental functions; its purpose is purely to promote education. ..... though section 44 of the act provides for financial contribution by the local government, the university is authorised to raise its own funds of income from fees, endowments and the like. it is a state-aided institution, .....

Kirpaldass Vs. the State

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the appellants were prosecuted as mentioned earlier. (2) there is no doubt that the p. w. 10 was seriously injured in the early part of the night of april 22, 1985. the only question that calls for decision is whether the prosecution has satisfactorily established that either gurdial or kirpal or both of them were responsible for the injuries found on .....

Dr. Bool Chand Vs. the Chancellor, Kurukshetra University

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC292; 1968LabIC232; (1968)IILLJ135SC; [1968]1SCR434

..... rule of law and importance thereof transcends the significance of a decision in any particular case.' 14. the power of appoint a vice-chancellor has its source in the university act : investment of that power carries with it the power to determine the employment; but the power is coupled with duty. the power may not be exercised arbitrarily, ..... made ordinarily for a period of three years and on terms on and conditions laid down by the chancellor. 5. there is no express provision in the kurukshetra university act or the statutes thereunder which deals with the termination of the tenure of office of vice-chancellor. but on that account we are unable to accept the plea ..... tenure of office of a vice-chancellor. it is necessary, in considering the validity of that argument, to read certain provisions of the kurukshetra university act 12 if 1956. by s. 4 the university is invested with power, inter alia, to do all such things as may be necessary, incidental or conductive of the attainment of all or .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Jubbi and Dunia, Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC360; [1968]1SCR447

..... in view of the decision in supdt. & legal remembrancer v. corp. of calcutta : 1967crilj950 , the state cannot also claim exemption on the ground only that the act does not expressly or by necessary implication make it binding on the state. 13. for the reasons aforesaid, we must hold that the conclusion arrived at by the judicial ..... that these three ways of abolishing the landowners' interest and transferring in two out of these three methods of the proprietary rights to the tenants suggest that the act was not intended to affect the land owned or held by the union or the state government. this concatenation cannot be accepted for, there is nothing in ..... department thereupon filed an appeal before the district judge, mahasu principally on the ground that the compensation officer had not followed the procedure laid down in the act and not given to the forest department reasonable opportunity to put forward its case. the forest department did not dispute in the said appeal that the appellant .....

Alok Kumar Roy Vs. Dr. S.N. Sarma and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC453; (1968)70BOMLR198; 1968(0)KLT292(SC); 1968MhLJ500(SC); [1968]1SCR813

..... appellant to be taken to gauhati where it was to be sealed. the appellant took the order to gauhati and after getting it sealed served it on the university. he was thereupon allowed to sit at the examination subject to the result of the writ petition. it also appears that thereafter the papers relating to the ..... that the learned chief justice thought fit to make these remarks in the judgment against a colleague and assumed without any justification or basis that his colleagues had acted improperly. such observations even about the judges of subordinate courts with the clearest evidence of impropriety are uncalled for in a judgment. when made against a colleagues ..... matter; presumably he did not agree with the view of the learned chief justice. often times, judges of high court are appointed under the commission of enquiry act to head commissions for various purposes. these commissions are temporary affairs and many a time their sittings are not continuous. a judge of the high court when he .....

S. Azeez Basha and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC662; [1968]1SCR833

..... that the charge of discrimination is based on the provisions of the benaras hindu university act which university is established by an act of its own. we do not think that art. 14 requires that the provisions in every university act must always be the same. each university has problems of its own and it seems to us that it is ..... petitions have been opposed on behalf of the union of india and its main contention is that the aligarh university was established in 1920 by the aligarh muslim university act, no. xl of 1920, (hereinafter refereed to as the 1920-act) and that this establishment was not by the muslim minority but by the government of india by virtue ..... for the legislature to decide what kind of constitution should be conferred on a particular university established by it. there can be no question of discrimination of the ground that some other university acts provide for some different set up. each university must be take to be class by itself and the legislature has a right to .....

Suresh Koshy George Vs. University of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1969SC198; [1969]1SCR317

..... rules are not statutory rules. they are merely rules for guidance. they could not have been framed under section 28 of the kerala university act. no other provision in that act empowers the syndicate to frame rules. but the delegation of powers made under those rules is valid as no fixed procedure is prescribed ..... 5. before examining those contentions it is necessary to mention a few more facts. the kerala university is governed by kerala university act, 1957. the engineering college, trichur is affiliated to the kerala university. under section 19n of the kerala university act, the control over the discipline of the students is vested with the syndicate of the ..... university. clause (v) of that section empowers the syndicate to delegate any of its powers to the vice chancellor. clause 3 ( .....