Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry extension of laws act 1968 section 2 definitions Court: karnataka Page 8 of about 590 results (0.164 seconds)

Sri Visalarn Chit Fund Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India, New Delhi and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1989Kant125; ILR1988KAR1518

..... deferred revenue expenditure and other intangible assets, if any, as per the latest audited balance sheet of the company. clause 14: the represent- ation for extension of the period of 2 years was rejected as the committee felt that the period :of three years was sufficient for securing the money invested be the ..... by arbitration. chapter xiii provides for miscellaneous provisions, viz., advisory role of reserve bank, appeals from the orders of the registrar, power of registrar to give extension of time for filing documents, penalties, offences by companies, etc. though the petitioners have challenged the vires of the entire act, in the course of their ..... dealing with the constitutional validity of pondicherry chit funds act observed thus -'we can find nothing objectionable in those provisions which call upon the foreman to register the by- laws of the chit furnish security as required by section 12 and obtain a certificate of commencement from the registrar. strong objection was taken .....

G.M. Venkatareddy and Another Vs. the Deputy Commissioner, Kolar Distr ...

Court : Karnataka

..... core of judicial discipline. but that which escapes in the judgment without any occasion is not ratio decidendi. in b. shama rao vs. union territory of pondicherry it was observed, it is trite to say that a decision is binding not because of its conclusions but in regard to its ratio and the principles ..... . in practice per incuriam appears to mean per ignoratium. english courts have developed this principle in relaxation of the rule of stare decisis. the quotable in law is avoided and ignored if it is rendered, in ignoratium of a statute or other biding authority. some has been accepted, approved and adopted by this court ..... arise whenever adverse possession is pressed into service. the preponderance if opinion is that the operation of adverse possession protects a trespasser or transgressor of the law and therefore ought not to be made available. references to the modern jurisprudence in america, united kingdom and european commission of human rights prefers the abolition .....

The Cashew Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1803; [1986]63STC90(Kar)

..... has the competence to levy tax. the order of the tribunal upholding the orders of the first appellate and the assessing authority do not suffer from any error of law justifying our interference under section 23 of the kst act. 35. in the result, and for the foregoing reasons these revision petitions are dismissed there being no ..... final. even assuming there was appropriation according to the corporation it was not a final 'appropriation'. if that is so, it is obvious there is no appropriation in law. there is, therefore, no substance in the contention urged on behalf of the corporation that there was appropriation of the goods to the contract even before the goods ..... or buyer as the case may be who makes the appropriation. the supreme court in carona sahu co. private ltd. v. : [1966]2scr845 has observed 'the law is well-established that in the case of contract for sale of unascertained goods the property does not pass to the purchaser unless there is unconditional appropriation of the goods .....

B.V. Mokashi Vs. Mysore State Road Transport Corporation and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1974)ILLJ153Kant; (1973)2MysLJ76

..... by the parliament or by the state including those vested with the duty to make decisions in order to implement those laws.' 6. in k. s. ramamurthy reddiar v. the chief commissioner, pondicherry, , this court, dealing with art. 12, held : 'further, all local or other authorities within the territory of india include all authorities within ..... of the court support our view that the expression 'other authorities' in art. 12 will include all constitutional or statutory authorities on whom powers are conferred by law. it is not at all material that some of the powers conferred may be for the purpose of carrying on commercial activities. under the constitution, the state ..... such a declaration could be issued, viz., (1) case of public servants falling under art. 311(2) of the constitution, (2) cases falling under the industrial law, and (3) cases where acts of statutory bodies are in breach of a mandatory obligation imposed by a statute, and after discussing several earlier decisions of the court, .....

K.V. Amarnath and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR730; 1998(5)KarLJ62

..... case has sworn the affidavit to this effect only.-- 'i, puttaswamy gowda g., age major, s/o 'shanti', no. 444, 8th cross, dollers colony, rmv extension, bangalore-94, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as under: i am the petitioner in the above writ petition and i know all the facts of the case ..... the circumstances leading to the enforcement of the impugned rules. the preamble to the karnataka excise act, 1965 states, 'whereas it is expedient to provide for a uniform law relating to the production, manufacture, possession, import, export, transport, purchase and sale of liquor and intoxicating drugs and the levy of duties of excise thereon in ..... are stated to have been considered by the state government before making the impugned amendment rules. 46. the narration of facts and circumstances and the position of law noted herein before would show the existence of the following circumstances before the passing of the impugned amendment rules--(a) that the karnataka excise act had been .....

Amir Bee Vs. the Sub-divisional Magistrate, Sakaleshpur and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1980Kant154

..... period of 6 years before the act was extended to the local area concerned or whether those provisions are also applicable to transactions entered into subsequent to such extension? '2. whether the above provisions have ceased to be operative after the introduction of the central evidence act and central transfer of property act to mysore ..... part of the enactment ( : [1955]1scr206 dominion of india v. shrinbai). thus, the non obstante clause operates to remove obstacles contained in the relevant existing laws which come in he way of giving effect to the provisions contained in the enactment to the non obstante clause is attached. the non obstante clause cannot be ..... their natural and ordinary meaning and the non obstante clause is to be understood as operating to set aside as no longer valid anything contained in relevant existing laws which is inconsistent with the new enactment.' : [1953]4scr1 aswini kumar v. arbinda bose) 'while recognizing the force of this argument it is however necessary .....

B.N. Raghuram Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR2332; 1993(3)KarLJ235

..... , subject to the petitioners giving an undertaking that they shall comply with the amended rule-5 and shift to the new place of business without seeking further extension of time to run the business in the same premises wherever they are now carrying on the business. in some of the cases action is already taken ..... legitimate expectation. if the former yields to the legislative power, the latter cannot claim a higher status as a relevant factor to be considered while testing a law under article 14.' the petitioners in these writ petitions cannot put their claim higher than that of the petitioners in the aforementioned decision of m/s. karnataka ..... from the places mentioned in sub-rule (1) of rule-5. the argument that proviso is confined to city municipality or city corporation limits is bad in law being discriminatory also cannot be accepted because the classification stands to reasons. hence, i unhesitatingly conclude that the impugned rule-5 is neither unreasonable nor arbitrary. re .....

Bommegowda Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1992KAR3148

..... furnishes the basis for striking down an act of legislature, if it is found to be totally unreasonable and arbitrary,'their lordships then go on to make extensive reference to anugrah narain's case before concluding that the postponement of general elections to all the zilla parishads was not a simple matter and such postponement ..... pradesh : [1983]140itr1(sc) . he relied in particular on the statement of the law in para 20, the question in that case was whether the state government can exercise its executive power and whether the executive power is co-extensive with its legislative power. answering the point, their lordships held:'the state in exercise of its ..... exercise power is charged with the duty and the responsibility of carrying on the general administration of the state. so long as the state government does not go against the provisions of the constitution or any law, the .....

Salarpuria Properties Private Limited Vs. M.S. Ramaiah Developers and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(6)KarLJ23

..... question whether there is a concluded and legally enforceable contract between the plaintiff and the defendant.25. having heard the learned counsels for the parties quite extensively and in the facts and circumstances of the case, the following three points arise for our consideration and decision:(i) whether the plaintiff proves that there ..... contention for the reasons stated by it in paragraph 16, which reads as follows.mr. chatterjee argued that the high court clearly committed an error in law in holding that the plaintiff had no wherewithal to pay the balance of consideration and it was further argued that the high court took into consideration ..... mis-joinder of necessary parties. the suit is filed without any cause of action, legal right or interest and therefore the suit is not maintainable in law.11. the defendant, without prejudice to the above contentions regarding maintainability, contended that there is no concluded contract between the parties requiring the defendant to execute .....

Telecom Employees Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Scheduled Cast ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR3320

..... by the impugned subsection, and has urged that, in the circumstances, it is only reasonable to hold that the legislature never intended to give these extensive and drastic powers to the executive without appropriate check by or in the shape of necessary rules for regulating their exercise and, from that point of ..... . conversion of agricultural land in favour of housing societies must be prohibited. revenue department will take necessary steps to issue executive orders or amend the law/rules to implement this decision.(d) the bangalore development authority apart from distribution of sites, must take up group housing in order to tackle the ..... the city of bangalore improvement act, 1945, stood repealed. under section 73, this act was to have the overriding effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent under any other law. it was further provided under section 68 that the 'housing board established under the karnataka housing board act, 1962, shall not undertake any housing scheme except .....