Skip to content


Polymerization - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: polymerization Page 1 of about 283 results (0.007 seconds)
Mar 18 2004 (HC)

Shri Jagdamba Polymeres Ltd. Vs. Neo-sack Ltd.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [2004]53SCL307(MP)

a m sapre j 1 this is a company petition filed by petitioner under section 433 e of the companies...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 1984 (TRI)

Collector of Customs Vs. Premier Tyres Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1985)(20)ELT124TriDel

c to chapter 39 did not concern itself with high polymers resols and polyisobutylene were polymerised up to a certain stage

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 04 2000 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Indian Acrylic Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT477TriDel

incorrect because it is not technically feasible to polymerise organic polymers and he suggested that the matter may be referred to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 1988 (TRI)

Nova Impex Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1988)(17)ECC56

been conceded by the appellants consultant that the goods are polymerised product and can be further formed into plastic product namely

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 06 1996 (SC)

M/S. Reliance Silicon (i) Pvt. Ltd., Etc. Vs. Collector, Central Excis ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1997VIIIAD(SC)401; AIR1997SC1617; 1997(58)ECC79; 1996(88)ELT3(SC); JT1997(10)SC215; 1997(8)SCALE145; (1997)1SCC215; [1996]Supp8SCR501

fluid silicone oil imported by the appellant was a silicone polymer and therefore liable to be covered for the purpose of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 29 1989 (TRI)

Meghdoot Laminart Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1990)(26)ECC62

by any argument observation that none of the processes of polymerisation are put into use by the appellant is not correct

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 20 1994 (SC)

M/S. Indian Cable Company Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Collector of Central Exci ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC64; 1994(48)ECC121; 1994LC20(SC); 1994(74)ELT22(SC); JT1994(6)SC243; 1994(4)SCALE260; (1994)6SCC610; [1994]Supp3SCR678; [1995]97STC307(SC)

conversion to pvc compound though admittedly no polymerisation or co polymerisation results nor any changes in the structural identity of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 1990 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Hico Products Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1990)(50)ELT381TriDel

of hydrolysis contain active silanol group through which condensation and polymerisation proceeds by varying the preparation of chlorotrimethyl silane which acts

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 10 2005 (TRI)

Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)(99)ECC597

that the appellants are not producing polyester staple fibre by polymerisation of organic polymers we also note that in the case

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 18 1987 (TRI)

international Linkers (India) Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)(42)ELT491TriDel

tariff heading 39 01 06 provides for polymerisation or co polymerisation products one of which is polyvinyl chloride the description against

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //