Policyholder - Judgments

Mar 01 1909 (FN)

Equitable Life Assurance Society Vs. Brown

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-01-1909

..... extravagant salaries commissions and expenses from the fund or surplus which belonged to the policyholders great waste and extravagance are alleged to have been committed by the defendant through ..... mentioned viz that the proposed or actual distribution of the money as between the policyholders themselves was not equitable or was based on erroneous principles wrongdoing waste misapplication of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 11 1993 (FN)

Department of Treasury Vs. Fabe

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-11-1993

..... intuitive appeal because certainly the payment of claims is of primary concern to policyholders and policyholders have a vital interest in the financial strength and solvency of their ..... administering the insolvency proceeding is reasonably necessary to further the goal of protecting policyholders without payment of administrative costs liquidation could not even commence the preferences conferred .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 1982 (FN)

Union Labor Life Ins. Co. Vs. Pireno

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-1982

..... against ull s continued use of nysca s peer review committee in evaluating policyholders claims after extensive discovery the district court granted petitioners motion for summary judgment ..... of prescription drugs respondents also alleged that the agreements encouraged blue shield s policyholders to avoid nonparticipating pharmacies thus constituting an unlawful group boycott the district court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 1920 (FN)

Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co. Vs. Lederer

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-19-1920

..... companies shall not return as income any portion of the premium deposits returned to their policyholders b mutual marine companies shall be entitled to include in deductions from gross income amounts ..... repaid to policyholders on account of premiums previously paid by them and interest paid upon such amounts between .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 1965 (FN)

United States Vs. Atlas Life Ins. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-17-1965

..... investment income so employed from the taxable income of the company and we think the policyholders claim against investment income is sufficiently direct and immediate to justify the congress in treating ..... setting aside that share of investment income which must be committed to the reserves undoubtedly policyholders have not contracted to have assigned to them either taxable or exempt dollars their .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 27 1979 (FN)

Group Life and Health Ins. Co. Vs. Royal Drug Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-27-1979

..... the retail prices of drugs and that petitioners activities had caused blue shield policyholders to boycott certain respondents the trial court granted petitioners summary judgment on the ..... the underwriting of risk and the relationship and transactions between insurance companies and their policyholders and no legislative intention is disclosed to exempt agreements or transactions between insurance .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 29 1978 (FN)

St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. Vs. Barry

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-29-1978

..... insurance companies or other traders from anticompetitive practices but withholds similar protection from policyholders victimized by private predatory agreements they urge that this case involves a traditional ..... nonetheless remains is whether congress intended to foreclose all sherman act protection for policyholders victimized by private conspiracies of insurers when a state has engaged in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 17 2018 (HC)

All India Idbi Officers Association Through Its General Secretary vs.u ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-17-2018

..... the investment regulations the principal object in framing the investment regulations is to insulate the policyholders from unwarranted risks and to ensure that the insurers do not default in their ..... 47 of 52 to take an informed decision whether the proposed investment would subject the policyholders to unwarranted risk 97 lic had explained that bancassurance channel use of banking channels .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 08 1941 (FN)

Pink Vs. A.A.A. Highway Express, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-08-1941

..... referee s opinion states no personal judgment will be ordered against nonresident members or policyholders who have not appeared generally or been served personally with process within the ..... such although the company was denominated mutual that term does not necessarily signify that policyholders are members or subject to assessment without the command of some constitutionally controlling statute .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 1926 (FN)

New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Edwards

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-19-1926

..... premium plan and issues both annual dividend and deferred dividend policies under this plan each policyholder pays annually in advance a fixed sum which when added to like payments by others ..... complete the distribution periods page 271 u s 116 accordingly all overpayments by deferred dividend policyholders must await apportionment until the prescribed period ends and no one of them will receive .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Policyholder - Judgment Search Results