Points - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: points Sorted by: recent Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.047 seconds)Murugappa Kadanthiar Vs. the Inspector of Panchayats-cum-collector of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-31-1968
Reported in: (1969)1MLJ615
..... consequently the resolution itself was illegal and should be quashed no point was raised at the hearing of the writ petition about the ..... 28 2 been considered in the bench decision but these are points which are clearly considered in the three decisions cited above subbaroya ..... to hold his office till determination by the district judge this point is i think covered by the observations of wallace j in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Trustees of H.E.H. the Nizam's Miscella ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-30-1968
Reported in: [1969]74ITR558(AP)
..... securities were free from tax under the indian income tax act otherwise there was no point in considering whether the nizam was exempt from tax or the trust was exempt from .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShefali Banerjee Vs. the State and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-24-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Cal544,1969CriLJ1367
..... proceeding under section 20 consequential upon conviction under sections 3 and 7 the learned judges pointed out that any other interpretation in respect of section 18 would make the provision discriminating .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJatindra Nath Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-23-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Cal461,[1969(18)FLR87]
..... of suspension by reason of resumption of departmental proceedings but the respondents have failed to point out any such rules applicable to the petitioner 13 i the result is that the ..... maharashtra 1968 iillj700sc here is another decision which has been wrongly relied upon the only point which has been decided by this case is that where departmental or criminal proceedings are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLate R. Sridharan by Legal Heirs Mrs. Rosa Marie Stenbchler and Minor ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-20-1968
Reported in: AIR1970Mad249; [1969]73ITR360(Mad)
..... relationship and 2 possession of property even viewing the status of nicolas sundaram from the point of view of a maintenance holder section 20 of the hindu adoptions and maintenance act ..... the peculiar facts of that case where there was no lineal descendant upto a particular point of time during the accounting year during which the department rightly treated the assessee therein .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMarudha Pillai Vs. V.S. Venkatarama Iyer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-20-1968
Reported in: (1969)2MLJ16
ordera alagiriswami j 1 the revision petition is by the defendant in o s no 640 of 1967 on the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKuppa Bai Vs. A. Rajagopal Nadar and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-20-1968
Reported in: (1969)2MLJ541
..... decision of the supreme court in gopala rao v seetharamamma 1965 3scr122 wherein it is pointed out that it is a well recognised rule that a statute should be interpreted if ..... app cas 425 is relevant in the context of the present case and to the point in that case the appellant who had been granted crown land in fee simple effected .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLate R. Sridharan by Legal Heirs Mrs. Rosa Marie Stenbehler and Minor ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-20-1968
Reported in: (1970)2MLJ334
..... relationship and 2 possession of property even viewing the status of nicolas sundaram from the point to view of a maintenance holder section 20 of the hindu adoptions and maintenance act ..... the peculiar facts of that case where there was no lineal descendant upto a particular point of time doing the accounting year doing which the department rightly treated the assessee therein .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV. Ramaswami Goundar Vs. S.T. Murugappa Chettiar and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-20-1968
Reported in: (1970)1MLJ284
..... the mere fact that the judgment debtor was in possession of assets at a particular point of time would not be sufficient because at the time when he is sought to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSouth India Corporation (Agencies) Private Ltd., Madras Vs. State Trad ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-20-1968
Reported in: AIR1970Ker138
..... or the other of the persons mentioned in the rule but as mulla points out at page 1340 vol 2 c p c this does not ..... sufficient in law i may alsomention that it has been held as mulla points out at page 1342 of the same book in the case of registered ..... necessary for the determination of that question it is quite true that the point which the defendant now desiresto raise has come out for the first time .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT