Pointing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: pointing Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 453 results (0.118 seconds)General Trade Point Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Mar-04-2005
Reported in: (2005)(101)ECC597
1 this appeal has been filed against order in appeal no c cus 365 2004 dated 31 5 2004 passed...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPack Point Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-11-2005
1 brief facts of the case are that the officers of the central excise department visited the factory of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. Billiards Point
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Dec-12-2005
1 after examining the records and hearing both sides i am of the view that the appeal itself requires to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSebi Vs. Business Point Services
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Feb-18-2005
..... the investigating authority a show cause notice dated 28 01 03 was issued to business point services hereinafter referred to as bps in light of the facts mentioned therein to show ..... of the securities and exchange board of india act 1992 i hereby direct that business point services be restrained from accessing the securities market and also be prohibited from buying selling .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNariman Point Association and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-06-2005
Reported in: AIR2006Bom50; 2005(4)ALLMR549; 2005(6)BomCR535; 2006(1)MhLj523
..... multistoreyed car parking facility together with a commercial complex at nariman point mumbai the earlier petition filed by the petitioners was disposed ..... us d y chandrachud j the aforesaid decision in nariman point association v state of maharashtra was delivered on 14th february ..... was filed before the court in december 2001 at which point of time a substantial part of construction work had been .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. First Point Finance Ltd.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-13-2005
Reported in: (2006)206CTR(Raj)626; [2006]286ITR477(Raj)
..... jay stocks mumbai master setu kothari shri suresh agarwal m s sound point export p ltd and m s rolex point laboratories ltd in varying sums by finding that while their existence .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNariman Point Chemical Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-20-2005
Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT88Tri(Mum.)bai
..... calcium borate valued at little over rs 2 23 crores imported by m s nariman point chemicals industries pvt ltd hereinafter referred to as npci with an option to redeem the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtul Kohli and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-07-2005
Reported in: I(2006)BC96; [2005]127CompCas237(P& H)
surya kant j 1 in this petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure prayer has been made...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMerchandisers (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-18-2005
Reported in: 2005(3)KLT381; [2005]142STC43(Ker)
..... which turnover tax on rubber was limited to the penultimate purchase point in the state which is the purchase preceding the last purchase ..... a purchasing dealer for claiming exemption from turnover tax at other points 1 i we here enter the name and full postal ..... act read with relevant notification applicable to the goods as already pointed out by us the petitioners did not raise any objection when .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.K. Gandhi and ors. Vs. Director of Education (Secondary) and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-30-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)ESC2265
..... laws viii whether the petitioners are entitled to any relief the points ii to v were framed by us earlier however we have ..... the school and the petitioners the minhas case is not applicable point iv to vi writ against the school not maintainable36 is a ..... the appropriate remedy however this observation is merely casual one this point was not involved in the central corporation case and nothing turns .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial