Skip to content


Pointing - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: pointing Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 453 results (0.118 seconds)
Mar 04 2005 (TRI)

General Trade Point Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Mar-04-2005

Reported in: (2005)(101)ECC597

1 this appeal has been filed against order in appeal no c cus 365 2004 dated 31 5 2004 passed...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 2005 (TRI)

Pack Point Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-11-2005

1 brief facts of the case are that the officers of the central excise department visited the factory of the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 2005 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Billiards Point

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Dec-12-2005

1 after examining the records and hearing both sides i am of the view that the appeal itself requires to...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 18 2005 (TRI)

Sebi Vs. Business Point Services

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Feb-18-2005

..... the investigating authority a show cause notice dated 28 01 03 was issued to business point services hereinafter referred to as bps in light of the facts mentioned therein to show ..... of the securities and exchange board of india act 1992 i hereby direct that business point services be restrained from accessing the securities market and also be prohibited from buying selling .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 06 2005 (HC)

Nariman Point Association and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-06-2005

Reported in: AIR2006Bom50; 2005(4)ALLMR549; 2005(6)BomCR535; 2006(1)MhLj523

..... multistoreyed car parking facility together with a commercial complex at nariman point mumbai the earlier petition filed by the petitioners was disposed ..... us d y chandrachud j the aforesaid decision in nariman point association v state of maharashtra was delivered on 14th february ..... was filed before the court in december 2001 at which point of time a substantial part of construction work had been .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 13 2005 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. First Point Finance Ltd.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-13-2005

Reported in: (2006)206CTR(Raj)626; [2006]286ITR477(Raj)

..... jay stocks mumbai master setu kothari shri suresh agarwal m s sound point export p ltd and m s rolex point laboratories ltd in varying sums by finding that while their existence .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 20 2005 (TRI)

Nariman Point Chemical Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-20-2005

Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT88Tri(Mum.)bai

..... calcium borate valued at little over rs 2 23 crores imported by m s nariman point chemicals industries pvt ltd hereinafter referred to as npci with an option to redeem the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2005 (HC)

Atul Kohli and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-07-2005

Reported in: I(2006)BC96; [2005]127CompCas237(P& H)

surya kant j 1 in this petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure prayer has been made...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 18 2005 (HC)

Merchandisers (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-18-2005

Reported in: 2005(3)KLT381; [2005]142STC43(Ker)

..... which turnover tax on rubber was limited to the penultimate purchase point in the state which is the purchase preceding the last purchase ..... a purchasing dealer for claiming exemption from turnover tax at other points 1 i we here enter the name and full postal ..... act read with relevant notification applicable to the goods as already pointed out by us the petitioners did not raise any objection when .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 30 2005 (HC)

M.K. Gandhi and ors. Vs. Director of Education (Secondary) and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Aug-30-2005

Reported in: 2005(4)ESC2265

..... laws viii whether the petitioners are entitled to any relief the points ii to v were framed by us earlier however we have ..... the school and the petitioners the minhas case is not applicable point iv to vi writ against the school not maintainable36 is a ..... the appropriate remedy however this observation is merely casual one this point was not involved in the central corporation case and nothing turns .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //