Skip to content


Point - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: point Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 498 results (0.301 seconds)
May 17 2001 (HC)

Shri Sat Deo JaIn Vs. M/S. Investment Point

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2001

Reported in: 94(2001)DLT259; 2001(59)DRJ505

orders k agarwal j 1 this is a petition under article 227 of the constitution of india read with section...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2001 (HC)

Centre Point Welfare Association Vs. Nita International

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Mar-08-2001

Reported in: (2001)4GLR2777

..... was not obtained ultimately special civil application no 8781 of 2000 was filed centre point welfare association filed the application being civil application no 7029 of 2000 which was ..... protection council vs ahmedabad municipal corporation the division bench considered the submissions in detail and pointed out the fantastic increased use of vehicles the court considered the decisions of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 2001 (HC)

Smt. R. Rajeshwari Vs. H.N. Jagadish and Another

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-05-2001

Reported in: 2001(5)KarLJ634

order1 petition filed under section 482 of the cr p c for restoration of a private complaint in p c...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 01 2001 (HC)

Goodlass Nerolac Paints Limited Vs. Paints Employees Union, Mumbai

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-01-2001

Reported in: (2002)1BOMLR514; [2002(92)FLR1123]; 2002(1)MhLj161

1 the short question involved in this writ petition is whether an employer can deduct wages of a workman on...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 2001 (HC)

Bank of India Vs. Kamlakar Vishwambhar Joshi and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-25-2001

Reported in: 2001(4)ALLMR663; 2001(4)BomCR756; (2001)4BOMLR581; [2001(91)FLR296]; (2001)IILLJ1463Bom; 2001(4)MhLj591

d y chandrachud j 1 rule returnable forthwith the first respondent who is an advocate has appeared in person the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 10 2001 (HC)

Rajinder Kumar Nangia Vs. Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-10-2001

Reported in: 2002(1)ALLMR1031; [2002(92)FLR689]; 2002(1)MhLj518

r m lodha j 1 the decision taken by the respondents to withhold the gratuity payable to the petitioner on...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2001 (HC)

M/S Texmaco Limiteds Vs. Shri Roshan Singh and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2001

Reported in: [2001(91)FLR138]; (2001)IILLJ982Del

order1 a large number of letters patent appeals have been filed against the judgment of the learned single judge dated...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2001 (SC)

State of Kerala Vs. M/S. Vattukalam Chemicals Industries

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-23-2001

Reported in: 2001VIAD(SC)377; AIR2001SC3330; JT2001(7)SC144; 2001(5)SCALE409; (2001)6SCC764; [2001]124STC233(SC)

..... contemplates exemption only on the turnover of goods taxable at the point of last purchase in the state and used by such ..... the particular copper scrape was concerned it became taxable at the point of last purchase in the state and therefore the particular copper ..... the respondent purchased became by reason of circumstances taxable at the point of last purchase in the state but whether copper scrape as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 2001 (HC)

Pradnya D/O Nagnath Ilayatnagarkar (Dr.) and ors. Vs. State of Maharas ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-07-2001

Reported in: 2002(3)BomCR382

..... follows the year in which the qualifying examination is conducted the points for consideration before the full bench were firstly whether the ..... of rule of the three months notice is the third point for consideration it is the contention of the candidates that ..... and therefore under no circumstances there could be compromise on the point of meritorious student being offered the seat of his choice .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 29 2001 (HC)

Sant Saran Sinha Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Aug-29-2001

Reported in: 2001(4)AWC2668

..... and one member and they differ on any point or points they shall state the point or points on which they differ and refer the same ..... petitioner is that if two members differ on any point they shall state the point or points on which they differ and refer the matter to ..... the other member for hearing on such point or points and the opinion of the majority shall be the order of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //