Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: plantations labour act 1951 section 10 medical facilities Court: kerala Page 6 of about 217 results (0.088 seconds)

Jul 13 1981 (HC)

Muthayyan Vs. Manager, Kadalur Estate

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1982)ILLJ23Ker

..... available for coming to a proper decision. from the materials available in the case i find that the petitioner is employed in a school run by a plantation. the plantation act requires the running of such a school the duties which a teacher in such a school discharges have to be proved by evidence. it may also be ..... is industry in reference to which the educational institution is the employer it must follow that the teachers who co-operate with the institution and assist it with their labour in imparting education are the employees of the institution, and so, normally, one would expect that the teachers would be emloyees who would be entitled to the ..... .j. 349, that the education is an industry, one will have to straightaway hold that drivers, clerks, etc., attached to the educational institutions are workmen. the labour court should have paused to consider in the light of the latest pronouncement of the supreme court whether teachers would come within the definition of section 2(s) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 1990 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Trophical Plantations Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1992]196ITR755(Ker)

..... deduction for payment on accrual basis only. relief can be granted only on that basis. (see cit v. k. a. karim and sons : [1982]133itr515(ker) and malayalam plantations (india) ltd, v. cit : [1990]184itr505(ker) ). even though the assessee maintains accounts on mercantile basis, it is entitled to adopt a different method for one portion ..... during the year, that the actualbonus for the year will be determined only much later after the completion of negotiations between the association and the representatives of the labour unions, that the bonus payable for the year 1975 was finally settled by negotiations only on december 22, 1978, and the payment was actually made only in ..... light of the full bench decision of this court, we hold that the rubber replantation subsidy received by the assessee is not a revenue receipt under the income-tax act, 1961, for the assessment year 1979-80. we answer question no. 3 in the affirmative, against the revenue and in favour of the assessee.10. admittedly, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 1968 (HC)

V. Venugopala Varma Rajah, Kollengode, Palghat Vs. Controller of Estat ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1969Ker304; [1969]72ITR226(Ker)

..... forest lands; and it is also equally well known that year after year large areas of forest lands in this state are being cleared and converted into valuable plantations. in the absence of exceptional circumstances such as the land being entirely rockv or barren for other reasons, all forest lands in this state are agricultural lands in ..... land. nor could it have been intended that succession to such lands should depend on the degree of tillage or preparation of the soil or of the skill and labour expended in rearing and maintaining the plants. we are of opinion that for the purpose of the relevant entries in lists ii and iii of schedule 7, the ..... we will quote section 5 as it stood before its amendment.'5. levy of estate duty--(1) in the case of every person dying after the commencement of this act, there shall, save as hereinafter expressly provided, be levied and paid upon the principal value ascertained as hereinafter provided of all property settled or not settled, including agricultural .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 1993 (HC)

Vayitri Plantations Ltd. Vs. Babu Mathew

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ1131Ker

..... at its sole discretion. thirdly, the inam is not payable if the targets were not achieved due to lack of orders, lack of materials, breakdown of machinery, lack of labour, strikes, lock-outs, go-slow or any other reason whatsoever. fourthly, if there was any deterioration in the workmanship on the part bf the employees, the scheme could ..... under the first or main part and is 'remuneration', it stands excluded by the exclusionary part or third part as it is similar to 'gratuity'. this is what the labour court held.12. we shall assume that, as contended for the appellant-employer, the 'ex-gratia' monthly payment is not in the nature of 'gratuity' coming within the ..... jagannadha rao, c.j.1. the meaning of the word 'wages' in section 2(rr) of the industrial disputes act, 1947, falls for consideration in this appeal.2. the appellant, vayitri plantations ltd., is the employer. the 3rd respondent was working as asst tea-maker of the thalamala estate of the appellant. a show cause notice was issued to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1991 (HC)

Augustine Mathai Vs. Appellate Authority

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ780Ker

..... he was employed in that activity and therefore he will come within the purview of the act. management of certain plantations and institutions belonging to the church are said to be the commercial activities. the church admits having plantations and institutions. but there is nothing to show that they are shops or commercial establishments or ..... according to the admission of the petitioner his monthly remuneration was only rs. 100/- besides some special allowances on festival days. petitioner complained to the district labour officer who held conferences which did not succeed. that is how he approached the first respondent by way of appeal which was dismissed under et. p1.3 ..... on a charge of misconduct supported by satisfactory evidence at an enquiry held for that purpose no such notice is necessary. an appeal lies before the deputy labour commissioner (authority) under sub-section (2) in case of contravention. petitioner claims that he was an employee under the 2nd respondent-church for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 2013 (HC)

Shwas Homes Pvt.Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... respondent refused to entertain the appeal on the ground that he is not the appellate authority to consider an appeal against the order passed by the assistant labour officer grade-ii, ernakulam; under the act. again, a lawyer's notice was issued by ext.p10 when the second respondent issued ext.p11, holding that the appeal can be entertained by the second ..... sub-section (2) of section 17 to the "competent authority". the "competent authority" has been defined under rule 2(b) as follows: "competent authority" means,-(i) in relation to a plantation the chief inspector of plantations; and (ii) in relation to any other establishment, the chief inspector of factories.6. in the circumstances, though an establishment covered under the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1981 (HC)

Dr. P.H. Daniel and anr. Vs. K.N. Krishna Iyer

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1982Ker95; (1982)IILLJ353Ker

..... .30. the plaintiff does not howevertrace the cause of action to the speechitself but to the subsequent publicationof that speech in the 'plantation worker'. this is a journal which is circulated only among the members and thattoo among those who have fully paidtheir subscriptions. there is no evidence.to ..... george which was then a subject of conciliation proceedings. the presence of reporters and a few government officers like the chief inspector of factories and the labour commissioner was inevitable on the occasion and relevant to the interests of the union. in the circumstances there cannot be any doubt that the occasion was privileged ..... and he was the president of its local branch at nelliyampathy. george was transferred from mereflores to bedaguli. george and the union regarded this transfer as an act of victimisation. according to george, when he reported for duty at the bedaguli estate where the plaintiff resides, he was, at the point of a pistol, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2007 (HC)

Noorul Islam Education Trust Vs. Assistant Labour Officer

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [2008(117)FLR533]; (2008)2LLJ774Ker

..... 1, 2006. the petitioner again submitted exhibit p-8 reply, later, exhibitp-9 inspection note was issued to the petitioner, pointing out the violations of certain labour laws committed by it. this writ petition is filed, challenging exhibit p-9.3. according to the petitioner, by virtue of the aforementioned notification issued by the ..... as part of that college, there is a dental hospital also. the question raised in this writ petition is regarding the applicability of the provisions of various labour laws to the said hospital.2. the brief facts of the case are the following. the petitioner runs a dental college, after getting all the requisite ..... of the preceding twelve months. section 2 of the said act, which deals with the applicability of the provisions of the act, reads as follows:2. application of act.--(i) it applies, in the first instance:(a) to every establishment being a factory, mine or plantation including any such establishment belonging to government and to every establishment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 1990 (HC)

George and ors. Vs. the Circle Inspector of Police, Mannarghat and ors ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1990Ker298; (1990)IILLJ502Ker

..... 2 acres of land in survey no. 130/1a in arakurussai amsom desom in mannarghat taluk. they claim to be in exclusive possession and enjoyment of the above rubber plantation from 1986 onwards. it is stated that the petitioners/appellants sold the right to cut and remove the old rubber trees from the estate to m/s. bappu ..... learned advocate general, who appeared for respondents 1 and 2. counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants were, not parties in the proceedings, wherein the regional joint labour commissioner passed the order dated 22-12-1989, that it was passed in a different situation and context, that the said order was largely based on consent and in ..... general and mr. k.p.g. menon, submitted in court that the scheme under the kerala headload workers act, 1978 is not applicable to the area wherein the petitioners' estate is situate and the order passed by the regional joint labour commissioner dated 22-12-1989 will not apply to the locality. in this view, we have to hold .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1962 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Kerala Vs. Malayalam Plantations Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1963]50ITR593(Ker)

..... -tax appellate tribunal when it made the reference. rule 3 of the above rules provides that the fund shall vest in a trust called the 'malayalam plantations trustees company ltd.' rule 11 defines members of the fund as members of the european staff and indian superintendants and assistants of the assesee, who after ..... 3) (c) is limited to expenses incurred by the assessee in actually raising the crop from which agricultural income is derived, e.g., wages paid to labourers and artisans engaged in agricultural operations, in transporting the crop to the market, in maintaining agricultural implements and cattle required for cultivation and for transport to market. ..... opearations and to be incidental to it and should be recognised as admissible allowance, unless there is any prohibition against it, express or implied, in the act. apparently remuneration paid out of agricultural income to the staff connected with that part of the activity is deductible without question; the dispute is only about .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //