Pit - Judgment Search Results

Bajrangbali Coal Company Vs. Coal Controller and ors.

Court: Patna

..... concerned regarding fixation of price of coal for despatch either from the pit heads or from the stock wherefrom the coal is to be ..... were necessary for imposition as the coal were being taken from the pit heads upto the stock yards at the cost of collieries and such ..... sale price had been included regarding the carriage of coal from the pit heads to the stock yards and the extra imposition of service .....

Selvaraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1998(2)ALT(Cri)165; 1999CriLJ67

..... the constitution and the provisions of the cofeposa act and the pit ndps act the question posed is thus answered where the detention order ..... has been made under section 3 of the cofeposa act and pit ndps act by an officer specially empowered for that purpose either by ..... regard there is a clear difference between the cofeposa act and pit ndps act 1988 on the one hand and the act and maintenance .....

Geetabai Tukaram Ambre Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1998)100BOMLR436

..... see the taking out of the dead body of the child from the pit in her statement under section 313 of cr p c the appellant has ..... the instance of the appellant the body of the child was recovered from the pit and at here pointing out the place where she had buried the child ..... time of the taking out the dead body of the child from the pit from the room of the accused and sitabai is the only person who .....

Badrilal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(62)ECC614

..... illicit traffic in n d p s act 1988 hereinafter called as pit ndps act for convenience 2 few facts need to be mentioned for ..... word trafficking means which has been used in section 2 e of pit ndps act section 2 e follows illicit traffic in relation to narcotic ..... which has been used in section 2 e of pit ndps act and the relevent provisions of pit ndps act permit the detaining authority to detain a .....

Hanamappa and Others Vs. the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Upper K ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1999(1)KarLJ539

..... a rational common sense pragmatic manner 4 when substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other cause of substantial justice justice deserves to be preferred for the ..... his statutory duty in our view cannot be pitted against the petitioner and when substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other cause of substantial justice deserves .....

Raj Bahadur Singh and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1999CriLJ1056

..... claimed in his statement under section 313 cr p c that a gaddha pit had been dug 6 and 7 days prior to the occurrence that the ..... no 2 repeated what raj bahadur accused appellant no had said about the pit and the removal of the bricks and denied the prosecution story and claimed ..... west and 6 cubit from north to south but they had dug their pit in the land measuring 13 cubit from east to west and 8 cubit .....

Hanamappa and ors. Vs. the Special Land Acquisition Officer

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1998KAR4071

..... a rational common sense pragmatic manner 4 when substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other cause of substantial justice justice deserves to be preferred for the ..... his statutory duty in our view cannot be pitted against the petitioner and when substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other cause of substantial justice deserves .....

Rajendra Singh Gandhi and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1998(3)AWC1864

..... to the state government re assess not more than once in a year the pit s mouth value if it considers that an enhancement is necessary 7 5 rules ..... not fix the rate of royalty at more than 20 per cent of the pit s mouth value 3 where the royalty is to be charged on the ..... pit s mouth value of the mineral the state government may assess such value .....

Kirloskar Investments and Finance Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Reported in: (1998)67ITD504(Bang.)

..... pvt 5 the eng amp indl aero pistons 21 4 1995 12384800 pit type services p ltd furnace 6 the eng amp indl omega steel ..... as undisclosed income the item that is covered by transaction no v is pit type furnace and in transaction no vi is flameless furnace whose purchase ..... from the letter of aero pistons that they are in possession of pit type furnace that is covered under the lease agreement and it is .....

S. Gnanasundaram Vs. S. Viswanatha Iyer

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1999)1MLJ516

..... varadarajan j had occasion to consider a case where the tenant had dug a pit and removed the earth which has been found to be fertile and held that ..... the act of the tenant in digging a pit t x 6 6 foot and removing 45 50 cu ft fertile earth is ..... 1983 1 m l j 246 96 l w 26 held that digging a pit in the land in question and the using the earth for manufacturing bricks would .....