Photographs - Judgment Search Results

Subhash Photographics and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1994(46)ECC10; 1993LC234(SC); 1993(66)ELT3(SC); JT1993(4)SC116; 1993(2)SCALE909; 1993Supp(3)SCC323; [1993]3SCR654

a batch of writ petitions. The question is whether the photographic machinery imported by the appellants falls under Customs Tariff Heading

S.S. Photographic Lab. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court: Guwahati

customers for the purpose of processing the same into positive photographs and prints for delivery thereof, against some job charges and

Subhash Photographics Vs. Union of India

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1992(3)BomCR49; 1992(62)ELT270(Bom)

determination in this batch of writ petitions is whether the photographic machineries imported by the petitioners fall under Tariff Heading No.

Indian Photographic Company Ltd., (Previously Kodak Limited), Madras V ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2002]128STC435(Mad)

that arises in the appeal is whether the sales of photography goods effected by the appellant/assessee to the local purchasers for

East India Photographic Traders' Association and Ors. Vs. State of Wes ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1984Cal92

ORDERG.N. Ray, J.1. In this Rule, petitioner 1, East India Photographic Traders Association and the petitioner No. 2, Sri Saral Kumar

India Photographic Co. Ltd. Vs. Mr. Saumitra Mohan Kumar

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1984)ILLJ471Cal

2 preferred by the plaintiff. Feeling aggrieved, the defendant, India Photographic Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) has preferred

Aver Photographic Company and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

1. These cases were listed today for reporting compliance to the stay order by which pre-deposit was directed. The applicants...

India Photographic Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1994)(71)ELT524TriDel

1787 dated 16-1-1987 for the clearance of a consignment of photographic films. After clearance of the goods they filed a claim

Procolor Photographics Private Ltd. Vs. Ocl Photo Industries (P) Ltd. ...

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

the complainant "is a concern of long standing dealing in photography, sale of photographic goods etc." as stated in para 1

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-ii Vs. Allied Photographics Ind ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2004(92)ECC777; 2004(166)ELT3(SC); JT2004(4)SC105; 2004(3)SCALE447; (2004)4SCC34; [2007]8STT365

the Companies Act 1956 and carries on business of manufacturing photographic printing paper which became chargeable to excise duty vide tariff