Phasing Current - Judgment Search Results

Youngstown Co. Vs. Bowers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and were essential to supply the manufacturer s current operating needs when after all phases of their importation had ended they were put ..... of some fibers in the factory was so essential to current manufacturing requirements that they could be said to have entered ..... since that interpretation is far broader than the narrow concept of current operational needs as applied by the wisconsin court it is .....

Greene Vs. Mcelroy

Court: US Supreme Court

..... he is effectively barred from pursuit of many aspects of his profession given the current dependence of most phases of the aircraft industry on defense department contracts not only for production but ..... military establishment with regard to industrial matters this work is being planned and in some phases carried forward by the following programs c development of plans and directives to protect .....

K.T. Rolling Mills Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. M.R. Meher and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1963Bom146; (1962)64BOMLR645; (1962)IILLJ667Bom

1 the question which falls to be determined in this appeal is whether it is open to the industrial tribunal...

Durga Dass Sohanlal and ors. Vs. the State

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1960P& H271; 1960CriLJ646

1 this is a criminal appeal filed on behalf of nine persons 1 durga das 2 banarsi das gupta 3...

C.N. Varadappan Vs. the State of Madras Represented by the Collector o ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1963)1MLJ405

s ramachandra iyer j 1 this is an appeal under section 7 1 of the madras act xxx of 1956...

Simplex Manufacturing Company (Private) Ltd. Vs. the Hindustan Tools M ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1960P& H164

claim before me was based on a mutual open and current account where there have been reciprocal demands between the parties

Qurabali and ors. Vs. Government of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1960Raj152

stated we think we act most in accordance with the current of authorities in refusing the permission prayed by the present

Frank Vs. Maryland

Court: US Supreme Court

for resisting the entry of the clerk was five pounds current money and so when in 1801 the power of inspection

Puttu Lal Vs. General Manager, N.E. Railway, Gorakhpur and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1960All438

delay in the taking of delivery of the goods the current practice therefore compels the railway in the interest of efficient

Pagadala Chengayya and anr. Vs. Noothanakalva Chenga Reddy

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1959AP632

andh wr 394 air 1957 andh pra 493 thus the current of judicial opinion is pre ponderatingly in favour of the