Phase Angle - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: phase angle Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 421 results (0.119 seconds)Grindlays Bank P.L.C. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-20-2001
Reported in: [2001]106CompCas1(Cal),2001(76)ECC335,2001(130)ELT419(Cal)
..... as favourable to them hence considering the matter in that angle also the other phase of interpretation namely section 10 1 a of the said ..... of the amount is violated hence considering the matter in this angle also namely the special norms of interpretation of a penal statute ..... hence the entire statute has to be looked into in that angle 25 hence once the rbi has dealt with the matter under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThumati Paripurna Govindamma and ors. Vs. Thatha China Venkata Subbaia ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2001
Reported in: 2002(3)ALT3
b prakash rao j 1 the defendants 1 2 and 4 are the appellants petitioners herein who are aggrieved against...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjai Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-30-2001
Reported in: 2002CriLJ3704; 2002(1)WLN660
maxillary 5 abrasion 4 0 x 0 2 cm left angle of mandible 6 abrasion 3 0 x 0 2 cm
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShyam Sunder and anr. Vs. Ram Kumar and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-31-2001
Reported in: AIR2001SC2472; JT2001(6)SC94; 2001(4)SCALE710; (2001)8SCC24
v n khare j 1 leave granted what is the effect of substituted section 15 introduced by the haryana amendment...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDukhi and ors. Etc. Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-18-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ2534
apart 5 abrasion 1 x 1 2 on the outer angle of left side face 6 abrasion 1 2 x 1
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Ganpat Dinkar Shinde and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-27-2001
Reported in: 2001ALLMR(Cri)1359; 2002BomCR(Cri)313; (2001)4BOMLR258; II(2001)DMC456; 2001(4)MhLj184
pratibha upasani j 1 this criminal appeal is filed by the appellant state of maharashtra being aggrieved by the judgment...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKothandapani and ors. Vs. State and Etc.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-20-2001
Reported in: 2003CriLJ151
a packiaraj j 1 the appellants are a 1 to a 4 in s c no 240 of 1990 on...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrakash Dhawal Khairnar (Patil) Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-12-2001
Reported in: AIR2002SC340; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)245; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)173; 2002CriLJ928; 2002(1)Crimes18(SC); JT2001(Suppl2)SC243; 2001(8)SCALE482; (2002)2SCC35; 2002(1)LC137(SC)
shah j 1 in sessions case no 152 of 1999 by judgment and order dated 19 5 2000 additional sessions...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Rajasthan and Etc. Vs. Deva Ram
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-27-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ2353
c m x c m right side of face near angle of mouth 6 lacerated wound 2 c m x 1
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSoundara Rajes and 3 Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Colle ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-29-2001
Reported in: (2001)3MLJ159
order1 the plaintiffs in o s no 357 of 1981 have filed these second appeals having aggrieved by the common...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial