Perceiver - Judgment Search Results

Suresh Chandra Samaddar and ors. Vs. Mathura Nath GaIn and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1925Cal1187,90Ind.Cas.47

greaves j 1 this is an appeal by the plaintiffs against a decision of the additional subordinate judge backerganj confirming...

Periaswami Nainar Vs. Kandasami Nainar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1927Mad1128

viswanatha sastri j 1 appeal by defendant 3 against the decree of the court of the district judge south arcot...

irwIn Vs. Gavit

Court: US Supreme Court

..... treated by equity as creating an interest in the fund apart from technicalities we can perceive no distinction relevant to the question before us between a gift of the fund for .....

The And#8220;spathari.And#8221;

Court: House of Lords

..... right in adhering to the decision of the lord ordinary the dean of faculty correctly perceiving that such conclusions as these would lead to the failure of this appeal elected not .....

Baldeodas Lohea Vs. Shubchurndas Goenka and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1926Cal327

..... then the position is such as we find it in this case and i cannot perceive that it is necessary for the process server to repeat his attempts to effect personal .....

Hem Chandra Kundu and ors. Vs. Jnanendra Chandra Kundu and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1926Cal116,90Ind.Cas.624

..... letter from him asking for adjournment but he had already commenced taking accounts then having perceived that on settlement of accounts hem chandra would become liable for a large amount he .....

Kandan Ashtamoorthi Nambudripad Vs. Rama Mudali and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1926Mad1052

..... begins to build on land supposing it to be his own and the real owner perceiving his mistake abstains from setting him right and leaves him to persevere in his error .....

Old Dominion Land Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of such officer to cause proceedings to be commenced we page 269 u s 67 perceive no requirement that the secretary should go further than to apply to the attorney general .....

Jivanchand Gambhirmal and ors. Vs. Laxminarayan Ganeshram

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 89Ind.Cas.885

..... date that contract then was a wagering contract before the due date arrived the defendant perceived that the price of the goods was rapidly falling and he thought it advisable to .....

Mabel Panton Vs. the Administrator General of Bombay

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR11

..... that these very important questions were in issue and had never been tried was not perceived at the trial either by the judge or the counsel for the parties and it .....