Per Se - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: per se Page 1 of about 68 results (0.014 seconds)Lalit Mohan (Se-retd.) and Others Vs. Dda and Others
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Engineering Cadre in DDA and CPWD are not similar. As per the Recruitment Rules for the post of S.E. in CPWD, A service whereas in DDA minimum of 7 years of service would be required for SE promotion eligibility. This stand of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSe Se Oil Vs. Gorakhram Gokalchand
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1962)64BOMLR113
sale of the goods in the suit. It would be permissible for the buyers to sell off their contractual rights to are all such as are permissible under the scheme of Section 7 and the arguments of Mr. Irani are accordingly not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHoe Kim Seing Vs. Maung Ba Chit
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1935)37BOMLR866
and there is ample evidence to show that all the persons interested in the paddy, viz., Po Thin, Hubba and Po is done and the buyer has notice thereof ; vide Section 22 of the Act. It is this rule which has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSap Se & Ors vs.transweave Solutions Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
MANMOHAN, J (ORAL): JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, trademark, passing off, rendition of of the defendants and their principal officers, directors, agents, franchisees, servants etc. plaintiffs User including (c) An order for the Rendition
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSap Se & Ors vs.sap Edge
Court: Delhi
i.e. a EULA (End User License Agreement) license does not permit the licensee to provide training to any third party except exclusive rights in the trademark SAP and SAP label under Section 29 of the Trademarks Act, 1999.11. The plaintiff has filed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSap Se vs.newyorksys Info Solutions Private Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
copyright in its SAP computer programs; (b) An order of Permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, its principal officers, directors, agents, franchisees, SAP logo, for promoting and offering its unauthorised training by setting up a number of websites. He states that such adoption
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPuma Se & Anr vs.nikhil Thermoplast Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
the view that due to extensive use over a substantial period of time, the plaintiffs PUMA mark along with the Form prayers in the plaint are reproduced hereinbelow: its agents, stockiest servants, a) A decree for permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, from
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSe Narappa and Others Vs. Holalkere Taluk Primary Co-operative Agricul ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: ILR2001KAR3802; 2001(5)KarLJ523
vacancy in the office of the President the Vice-President shall perform the duties of the President. However, there is no reference 3. The resignation of a member is dealt with under Section 29B of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDy.Y.Se Vs. Dr.i. Poornachandra Rao, Paathrudu and O
Court: Andhra Pradesh
a senior officer of the department i.e.the Additional Director (Ayush).A perusal of the report discloses that the petitioner and the 1st Dr.I.Poornachandra Rao, Paathrudu and others..Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.B. Sesi Bushan Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Sr.G. Vidyasagar, for R-1
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSes Technologies Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Per Jyoti Balasundaram The issue in dispute in this appeal is decided by the Tribunal in the assessee’s own case as seen from 2006 (201) ELT 562 holding that the item is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>