Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: payment and settlement systems act 2007 section 29 application of fine Page 23 of about 971 results (0.155 seconds)

Airtech Pvt. Ltd., Harichand Vs. Income-tax Settlement

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT IT

..... in deciding whether a case should be admitted or rejected.20. shri harish referred to the provisions of section 245e relating to reopening of completed proceedings by the settlement commission. he pointed out that there was no requirement therein that there should be an offer of additional income for the year for which the proceedings were ..... benefit to the revenue, while needlessly proliferating litigation and holding up collections. we would, therefore, suggest that there should be a provision in the law for a settlement with the taxpayer at any stage of the proceedings." 23. the bill which was introduced to give effect to the wanchoo committee's recommendations was the taxation laws ..... payable for the purposes of proviso (b) to section 245c(1) but also for the purposes of section 245d(2a) to (2d), which relate to the payment of the additional income-tax on the admission of the application. dr.balasubra-manian in the course of his arguments stated that section 245c(1d) was relevant only .....

United States Vs. Des Moines Nav. and Ry. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of any inference from these congressional proceedings, there can be no doubt that a party doing work under a contract with the state, making a settlement, and receiving a conveyance of these lands in payment for that work is a bona fide purchaser. if so, this cause of action fails, and the bill must be dismissed. but the case does ..... 1861? and here the significance of this resolution is evident. it was passed by congress after the settlement proposed by the iowa legislature in 1858 ..... offered by another? and if this settlement was made in good faith, and without fraud, is it not clear that the navigation company, taking the lands which the state offered in payment for the work which it had done, took those lands as a bona fide purchaser, and therefore comes within the letter and spirit of the resolution of .....

St. Louis Mining and Milling Co. Vs. Montana Mining and Milling Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... make affidavit that, among other things," "such application is made for his exclusive use and benefit, and that his entry is made for the purpose of actual settlement and cultivation, and not, either directly or indirectly, for the use or benefit of any other person." "and section 2291, which prescribes the time and manner ..... should be upheld unless contravening some statute or some fundamental principle of law recognized as the basis of public policy. there was no such statute, and settlements of matters in litigation or in dispute without recourse to litigation are generally favored, and are apparently of frequent occurrence in regard to mining land claims; nor ..... lode mining claim, mayger made, executed, and delivered to robinson, huggins, and sterling a certain bond for a deed whereby, in consideration of the compromise and settlement of the action and the withdrawal of the protest and adverse claim, he covenanted and agreed that, when he should obtain a patent as applied for, he would .....

Marek Vs. Chesney

Court : US Supreme Court

..... be deterred from bringing good faith actions to vindicate the fundamental rights here involved." [ footnote 2/45 ] yet requiring plaintiffs to make wholly uninformed decisions on settlement offers, at the risk of automatically losing all of their postoffer fees no matter what the circumstances and notwithstanding the "excellent" [ footnote 2/46 ] results ..... to increase costs unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally such excess costs." the section was amended after roadway express to require the payment of "excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct." pub.l. 96-349, 3, 94 stat. 1156, 28 u.s ..... s. 761 -762. specifically, allowing the definition of "costs" to vary depending on the phraseology of the underlying fees-award statute "would create a two-tier system of attorney sanctions. . . . under roadway's view of 1927, lawyers in cases brought under those statutes [authorizing fees as part of the costs] would face .....

K. Lalzidingliana Vs. State of Mizoram and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... by issuance of patta or periodic patta as prescribed by the rules.rule 6 indicates that temporary allotment are made by issuing periodic patta and permanent allotment or settlement are made by issuing patta.applications for allotment are to be made under rule 7 and on receipt of such application for temporary allotment, the authorities are required ..... petitioner was allotted a periodic patta on 27.4.05 and the said allotment has also been registered on payment of requisite fee in the appropriate register, the authorities could not have considered the said allotted land, to be available and vacant and free from all encumbrances, ..... on completion of the registration under rule-25, a periodic patta or any other patta as the case may be shall be issued to the patta holder on payment of the requisite fee.9. by referring to the aforesaid provision of the act and the rules, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the .....

Subhadra Devi Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... possession over the lands which were demarcated by pillars and, therefore, there was no question of acquisition of the disputed lands on payment of compensation to the claimants. the forest settlement officer accordingly directed that the forest department will maintain their possession according to the demarcated map.5. against the order passed by the ..... lands notified as protected forest under section 29 of the act. the scheme envisaged the determination of the claim at the first instance by the forest settlement officer, an appeal before the collector of the district, a second appeal before the divisional commissioner and finally a revision before the board of revenue. ..... and was, therefore, not maintainable as in the year, 1962 there was no appeal provided before the collector against the order passed by the forest settlement officer. this also explains why the state government had to wait for about six years for filing a second appeal before the divisional commissioner against the .....

H. Munal Singh and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Manipur and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... deputy commissioner at any time during the term of settlement correct any error in the area or the assessment of any survey number or sub-division due to a mistake of survey or arithmetical miscalculation :provided that ..... commissioner to correct errors etc.--(1) the powers and duties 'exercisable by the officers referred to in section 6 may also be exercised, during the term of settlement, by the deputy commissioner or such other revenue officer as may be specified by the state government for the purpose by notification in the official gazette.(2) the ..... powers exercised by different categories of officers during the period of 'revenue survey', and those after the close of the survey, that is during the 'term of settlement'. the expression 'revenue survey' has been defined in section 24 to mean the operations carried out ''to determine or revise the land revenue payable on lands in .....

The Talukdari Settlement Officer Vs. Akuji Abhram Muse

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1922)24BOMLR762

..... facts of the present case.4. that decision disregards the decision of this court in shankerbhai v. raisingji : air1917bom235 in which the plaintiff resisted the right of the talukdari settlement officer to serve him with a notice under sections 202 and 79a of the bombay land revenue code on the ground that he was a mortgagee, and had represented to ..... 2, no such notice was given by him, and therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to possession of that part of the suit property which is in his possession without payment.8. with regard to that portion of the suit property which is in possession of defendants nos. 8 to 10, it has been argued that they had no knowledge that ..... should not have been decided in one suit.2. then the judge has allowed the plaintiff to redeem the plaint lands remaining in possession of defendant no. 2 on payment of rs. 95 within six months.3. the plaintiff appeals against that part of the decree on the ground that he issued notice under section 29b of the gujarat .....

Purushottam Hargovandas Vs. Rajbai Rajaji Hiraji

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 4Ind.Cas.839

..... of the respondent in supporting the judgment of the lower court was that the managing officer mentioned in section 29e is a different officer from the talukdari settlement officer who has the charge of the proceedings in execution and, therefore, a claim which, came to his knowledge as the officer charged with the execution ..... to have been satisfied, and that, therefore, nothing more could be done under the execution proceeding.5. the plaintiff objecting to that decision of the talukdari settlement officer, complained to the subordinate judge.6. the subordinate judge has held that the plaintiff cannot succeed in his application for two reasons: first, because the ..... the court by the judgment-creditor that the execution of the decree might be carried out, and those applications were forwarded by the court to the talukdari settlement officer with endorsements directing that the execution should proceed.3. on the 3rd of july 1907, the plaintiff applied to the court stating that the present .....

Ganpat Bhaduji Thakre, Etc. Vs. Corporation of City of Nagpur and Othe ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR115; (1993)ILLJ669Bom

..... mentioned. however, the standing orders framed on november 18, 1966 purported to have been passed under the provisions of the c.p. and berar industrial disputes settlement act contained no such provision. under section 35(5) of the bombay industrial relations act, until standing orders came into operation under the provisions of sub-section ..... bombay had certified that the standing orders had been settled on november 18, 1966 under section 30(2) of the c.p. and berar industrial disputes settlement act, that certificate should be regarded as sufficient for inferring that the proceedings were pending when the bombay industrial relations act was made applicable. it is ..... having been made applicable with effect from may 2, 1965, and any standing orders framed purportedly under the authority of the c.p. and berar industrial disputes settlement act, would not be valid. shri samarth the learned counsel for the corporation, however, urged that these standing orders would be saved by virtue of the .....