Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: payment and settlement systems act 2007 section 29 application of fine Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel Page 1 of about 2 results (0.134 seconds)

Sitapuram Power Limited and Another Vs. Transmission Corporation of An ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... of electricity where the maximum power to be made available at any time exceeds one megawatt. 44. however, by introducing a very onerous interim balancing and settlement system where the deviation in power injected by open access generator even for a time block of 15 minutes has to be paid as demand charges for the ..... with the rates/charges specified by the commission or nodel agency, on the basis of settlement determined in accordance with the balancing and settlement code approved by the commission (clause-5.1). the open access user has also to provide payment security equivalent to about 2 months bill and for imbalance in supply and consumption of ..... tariff policy specifically provides that in case of outages of the generator, supplying to an open access consumer, suitable arrangements should be provided by the licensee on payment of rate for temporary connection to that consumer category as specified by the appropriate commission. section 61 (i) of the act, 2003 stipulates that the said .....

Ntpc Limited Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and Others

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... , we observe that the learned central commission after prudence check of the claim made by the appellant, has allowed additional capitalization of the balance payment/final settlement made in respect of completed work which was covered under the original scope of work under regulation 9(2)(viii). however, the claims not ..... consideration in the instant appeal:- (a) disallowance of capitalization of spares amounting to rs.17.03 crores. (b) disallowance of capital expenditure towards sewerage system amounting to rs.124 lakhs during fy 2011-2012 (c) disallowance of capital expenditure towards balance work of various packages amounting to rs.21.29 lakh ..... ) that the central commission has rightly disallowed the additional capitalization claimed by the appellant in respect of the following: (i) capital initial spares. (ii) sewerage system in plant. (iii) balance work of various packages. (b) that the appellant has questioned the interpretation of regulation 7 and 9 of central tariff regulations, .....

Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Electricity R ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... and after negotiations between the parties, the parties agreed, vide agreement dated october 12, 2007 to the payment of a sum of rs. 2.5 crores by respondent no. 2 to the appellant as one time settlement for the reduction of the transmission open access demand by the respondent no. 2 from 30 mw to ..... in the year 1998 vide letter dated july 23, 2998 to wheel its surplus electricity generated at its cpp to its unit at vadodara using the transmission system of the appellant (erstwhile geb). 4. the commission was established and started functioning on april 19, 1999 initially under the provisions of the electricity regulatory commissions ..... section 3 of these regulations, these shall apply to open access for use of intra-state transmission system and/or the distribution systems of licensees in the state, including when such system is used in conjunction with inter-state transmission system unless explicitly stated to be applicable only for a specific category of licensee. 15. respondent no. .....

Tata Power Company Ltd. Vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. and ors.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL405

..... table no. 1. total interest accrued due from tpc to rel = rs. 15.14 crores. we are to point out that: 1. as parties have confirmed the settlement till 31^st march, 1999, adjudication is undertaken for the period from 1^st april, 1999 onward. 2. sbi plr rates taken are the same as considered in para ..... be paid by the tpc, regardless of whether the facility is used by it or not. in case, the tpc draws the electricity through the facility, the payment of electricity actually consumed will have also to be paid additionally. the concept of this special arrangement of standby facility emanated from the concern of gom/mseb to ..... licensee shall supply the power so generated to their consumers by making their own transmission and distribution arrangements. (3) the licensee shall also execute suitable interconnection with the system of tata electric companies with the approval of the central electricity authority, new delhi. (4) if the government of maharasthra is of the opinion that the licensee has .....

Dodson-lindblom Hydro Power Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regulator ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... based tariff regime at state level within maharashtra and other related issues wherein the commission has not considered generators as part of imbalance pooled settlements and hence unscheduled inter change charges are not applicable to generators. 26) in view of this counter affidavit the issue regarding imposition of ..... to the appellant. the commission in the impugned order said: the other issues raised such as charges for unscheduled interchange, billing and payment mechanism, rebate/late payment surcharge, demonstration of declared capacity and deemed generation shall be governed by the respective regulations of the commission. 24) the commissions ..... generating stations with rotating exciters mounted on the generator shaft 0.2% of energy generated (b) surface hydro electric power generating stations with static excitation system 0.5% of energy generated (c) underground hydro electric power generating stations with rotating exciters mounted on the generator shaft 0.4% of energy .....

Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd., and Another Vs. Gujarat Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... at any time till the order dated 01.06.2011 was passed. accordingly, the shaifali rolls should be deemed to have exercised the option as per the settlement proposed and particularly, the payment of pocs as per commercial circular no. 706 (quashed) by the state commission long back. 5.5 that after the decision of the state commission on ..... while the transmission system of the second respondent cseb is affected apart from the admitted fact the transmission grid is strengthened by the power injected by cpp .? 18. however, we make ..... more and hence it is liable to pay the charges for the service.? 12. the contention that no charges at all is payable for parallel operation or transmission system cannot be sustained and such a claim is contrary to factual position. there is no escape of cpp to pay charges for parallel operation by which the cpp gains .....

Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Vs. Karnataka Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL164

..... fact in mind. however, we further direct the company that should there be any need for entering into a fresh settlement with the workmen, then any agreement which entitles the workmen to get overtime payment even when overtime work is unnecessary should be done away with. with the above observations as a future guidance, we ..... ) particularly, in the context of the proposal for closing down the mulajore plant. it also observed that the overtime payment made to the employees was a worrying feature. it also noticed that because of the settlement with the workmen, the company was paying the workmen overtime irrespective of the need for the same and such ..... payment had no justification especially when the same has to be passed on to the consumers. therefore, it recommended a drastic cut or alternatively phasing out of this system of overtime payment. the commission .....

M/S Indo Rama Synthetics (i) Ltd, Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regulato ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... injection of energy during the above period proportionately to the distribution licensees without any commitment for compensation. 6.3. clause 15.1.3 of the final balancing and settlement code in case of short term contracts for merchant generation is reproduced below: 15.1.3. applicability of ui charges to merchant generator ..... . sldc, mestcl, further, submitted that, since the petitioner injected the energy without any contract/schedule or knowledge of sldc, msetcl the question of making payment for the same does not arise if such transaction is permitted, it will result in creation of wrong precedence and result in more such cases. further, ..... operations; (c) keep accounts of the quantity of electricity transmitted through the state grid; (d) exercise supervision and control over the intra-state transmission system; and (e) be responsible for carrying out real time operations for grid control and despatch of electricity within the state through secure and economic operation of .....

In the Matter Of: Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation L ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... and a separate memorandum of understanding would be signed between them in this regard. the agreement dated 6.1.2006 also provides that in case of non-settlement of dispute arising out of or relating to the agreement, or breach or validity, thereof, the same would be settled by arbitration in accordance with the ..... the tariff regulations for determining transmission tariff applicable to inter-state transmission of electricity under section 61 of the electricity act. operation and maintenance of transmission system is a component of transmission tariff. tariff regulations 2004 applicable for the period 2004-09 and tariff regulations of 2009 applicable for the period 2009-14 ..... the relevant extracts of the impugned order are reproduced below. 17. therefore, the core issue raised for adjudication in the petition is in regard to the payment of oandm charges by pgcil to the petitioner tneb. 18. before going into the merits of the case, it is necessary to examine certain preliminary issues .....

In the Matter Of: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company L ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... person has been granted open access and while availing the open access, when that person has raised some downstream issues/disputes relating to billing, payments etc. then it must go to the consumer grievance redressal forum. it is entirely inconveivable that the consumer grievance redressal forums established by the ..... have due regard to all relevant factors including such cross subsidies, and other operational constraints: provided that [such open access shall be allowed on payment of a surcharge] in addition to the charges for wheeling as may be determined by the state commission: further provided that such surcharge shall be ..... of the distribution open access regulations 2006 provides the express mechanism for settlement of disputes of consumers relating to open access. therefore, all disputes of a consumers related to open access, irrespective whether such disputes relates to the distribution system or the transmission system, are to be considered as a consumer dispute. therefore, the .....