Skip to content


Pattern Matching - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: pattern matching Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 29 results (0.029 seconds)
Aug 05 2010 (TRI)

Sunil Shares and Stock Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Securities and Exchange Board ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Aug-05-2010

..... at the same price we have also no doubt that such matching orders could not result into trades without the knowledge and connivance ..... of the appellant as a stock broker their pattern of trading leaves no room for doubt that they executed synchronized ..... argument is that since the client himself had punched in the matching orders the appellant cannot be held to be responsible for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 10 2010 (TRI)

N J Shares and Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Aug-10-2010

..... brokers including the appellant were playing mischief firstly such a large number of trades cannot match between the same parties and then they cannot get reversed between those very parties on ..... the same day the irresistible inference that one can draw from the trading pattern of the appellant along with its counter party broker is that they were manipulating the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 03 2010 (TRI)

S. Santhosh Kumar and Others Vs. the Chief General Manager, (Telecom), ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Nov-03-2010

01 10 2000 as a consequence central dearness allowance cda pattern of scale of pay of rs 3200 4900 for telephone

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 19 2010 (TRI)

Anuradha Sridhar Vs. Dr.Umesh M. Thakkar

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-19-2010

and in the evening he would become very feverish this pattern continued till monday evening when his fever became quite high

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 04 2010 (TRI)

M/S Grishma Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Adjudicating Officer, Securities ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Aug-04-2010

..... cannot be accepted in view of the large number of synchronized matched trades executed by them 2 the learned counsel for the appellants ..... will have to be gathered from the surrounding circumstances including the pattern of trading the frequency of the trades and their volumes the ..... we do not think that such large number of trades could match between the same parties through the same brokers unless the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 26 2010 (TRI)

Indiabulls Securities Limited and Others Vs. Securities and Exchange B ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Oct-26-2010

..... significant variations in the traded price of the underlying security it is alleged that synchronized matched close out transactions were executed in respect of various contracts with different underlying securities wherein ..... the board took us extensively through the records of the case in particular and trading patterns in fando segment in general we find that the appellant has been held guilty for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 05 2010 (TRI)

M/S. Agroy Finance and Investment Ltd. and Another Vs. the Securities ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Aug-05-2010

..... it is further alleged in the show cause notice that the matching orders placed by the appellant along with the other brokers ..... are usually maintained by the stock exchanges which clearly indicate the pattern of trading in the instant case the trades were executed ..... were not available this is the basic record which shows the pattern of trading in these circumstances we are constrained to observe .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 20 2010 (HC)

D.S. Jaspal and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-20-2010

part a conventional sum the judges have worked out a pattern and they keep it in line with the changes in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 27 2010 (TRI)

Peram Venkayamma and Others Vs. Dr. P. V. Raghava Sarma, Md, Dm and An ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Jan-27-2010

by snake bites but they does not have any particular pattern as mentioned in pm report he further stated that two

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 19 2010 (HC)

Pushpalatha N.V. W/O Nemraj Vs. V. Padma Widow of Vasantha Kumar D.N.,

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-19-2010

and good conscience rules of law should establish a uniform pattern for harmonious existence in a society where every individual would

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //