Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 66 amendment of section 126 Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 54 results (0.153 seconds)

Parikh Amratlal Ramanlal and ors. Vs. Rami Mafatlal Girdharlal and ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1982)2GLR337

..... 0. 3 rule 2ia) is not in any way inconsistent with the provisions of the amendment act of 1976. it must, therefore, be held that the learned member of the tribunal committed a patent error of law when he took the view that the amendment effected by the gujarat high court 1961 in 0.3 r.2(a) has stood repealed ..... of the code of civil procedure as amended by the act of 1976, the said amendment made by the gujarat high court stands repealed on the commencement of the said amendment act, in view of section 97(1) of the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1976. it was contended that the aforesaid reasoning of the tribunal is patently erroneous.5. the contentions raised by mr ..... by section 97 of the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1976. hence the second ground on which the learned member of .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-ii Vs. Godhra Electricity Co. ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1983)32CTR(Guj)141; [1983]140ITR657(Guj)

..... january 19, 1950. on the recommendation of the said committee certain charges were fixed with effect from february 1, 1952. thereafter the electricity (supply) act was amended sometime in 1956. the assessee unilaterally increased the charges for motive power with effect from january 1, 1963, to 35np. per unit with a minimum of ..... december 3, 1968. the division bench of this court in the aforesaid two letters patent appeals reversed the decrees passed in favour of the respective consumers and dismissed both the suits holding that under the electricity (supply) act, as amended in 1956, the assessee was entitled to enhance the charge unilaterally subject to the ..... conditions prescribed in the sixth schedule to the said act. the respective consumers feeling aggrieved by the decision of the division bench of this court in the aforesaid two letters patent appeals carried the matter to the supreme court. .....

Press Metal Corporation Limited Vs. Noshir Sorabji Pochkhanawalla and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1983Bom144; ILR1983Bom805

..... controller in the order passed by him. the modification have been effected by the controller without any jurisdiction whatsoever. the powers to amend a specification are to be found in section 15, 18, 19, 57, 59 and 78 of the patents act, 1970. section 15 empowers the controller to requires the applicant's specification or drawing to be ..... amended to this satisfaction before he proceeds with the application if he is satisfied that the application or specification does not comply with the requirements of the act or the rule made thereunder. so also ..... the art and who intend to act upon the specification. in the present case as already stated above, the invention is described in an obscure and ambiguous language, and on the ground also the patent is liable to be refused.42. this bring me to trial last question viz., the amendment effect by him. shri shah also .....

Ram Puri, Chandigarh Vs. Chief Commissioner, Chandigarh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1982P& H301

..... thereof. the amendment seemingly brought the situation of the law to the level as understood by this court in letters patent appeal no. 218 of 1965 aforementioned with regard to the ownership aspect, vide objects and reasons aforequoted and emphasised.6. to appreciate the above deductions better, let sections 3 and 8-a of the act be reproduced one ..... to acquire, hold and dispose of property. these articles were in the constitution till 20th june, 1979, from which date they were deleted under the constitution (forty-fourth amendment) act, 1978. but s. 3(3) only saves the vice that despite the sale, the government fictionally continues to be the owner of the property sold subject to the ..... writ petition no. 2830 of 1970. despite the life given to the resumption orders by the validation clause in section 7 of the parliament act no. xvii of 1973, the provisions of the amending act became retrospectively applicable from 1-11-1966, but s. 7 at once with effect from 9-4-1973. it was provided in s. .....

Kalwa Vs. Vasakha Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1982P& H480

..... guesswork with what material the legislature would, if it had discovered the gap, have filed it in. if a gap is disclosed, the remedy lies in an amending act.' however, the limits placed on judicial law reform by the nature of the forensic process and the somewhat dangerous consequences of unrestrained judicial law making, are well ..... or inconvenience.95. in my opinion the current view, when viewed in the light of foregoing discussion, with great respect, is manifestly erroneous, unreasonable, unjust and patently contrary to the statutory intent and, therefore, despite implicit respect that the doctrine of stare decisis commands, i cannot but hold that the current view no longer ..... statute can be performed and the same re-written selectively by a fictional process of interpretation. the attempt at such a construction appears to me as a patent trespass into the field of legislation under a valid cloak and garb of its interpretation. to obliterate the non obstante clause and to start reading a .....

State Bank of India Vs. the Sonepat Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1982P& H427

..... this letters patent appeal arises against the said judgment.4. the only question that arises for determination is whether a person, who claims the property by title paramount to the judgment-debtor, can file objections under o. 21, r. 90 of the code. in the present case, admittedly, the code before its amendment by the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1976, ..... the two codes. even the facts of that case are similar to those of the present case. therefore, in our opinion, the above ratio will apply even after the amendment of the civil p. c., in 1908. the same interpretation is spelt out from the other cases referred to by ch. ram sarup and jagat narayana singh's case ..... by a full bench, was also different. in that case, the question before the full bench was whether an interim receiver appointed under section 20 of the provincial insolvency act was entitled to apply to set aside a court sale of the property of a debtor under o. 21, r. 90 ibid. the learned full bench came to the .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-iv Vs. Kundan Lal

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1982)30CTR(Del)343; ILR1982Delhi195; [1983]144ITR547(Delhi)

..... power on the ito or the aac to impose a penalty. but this is subject to s. 274.19. section 274, before its amendment by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1970, read :'274. procedure-(1) no order imposing a patently under this chapter shall be made unless that assessed has been hears, or has been given a reasonable opportunity of being hears. (2) notwithstanding ..... appellate assistant commissioner on making an order under this chapter imposing a patently shall forthwith send a copy of the same to the income0-tax officer.'20. as a result of s. 49 of the i. t. (amend.) act, 1970, which came into force on 1st april, 1971, s,. 274(2) was amended to read as follows :' (2) notwithstanding anything contained in clause (iii .....

T. Pandurangam Vs. General Manager, South Central Railway

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1983)IILLJ265AP

..... the andhra pradesh high court in sivaramabrahman v. satyanarayanna : air1967ap181 . 21. omitting thus to consider the amended school register and the decree would clearly amount to a patent error of law apparent on the face of the 'record' as held by us above and also to an act in excess of jurisdiction in the words of lord denning in baldwin & francis ltd. v ..... . patent appeal tribunal (1959) a. c. 563; (1959) all e.r. 33. the respondents' counsel fairly stated and, rightly in our opinion, that these aspects cannot be said .....

Banwarilal Chowkhani Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court : Guwahati

..... matter to the iac who imposed an order of penalty by his order dated november 29, 1971. meanwhile as section 274(2) of the income-tax act had been amended by the t.l. (amend.) act, 1970, with effect from april 1, 1971, under which the iac did not have jurisdiction to impose penalty in such matters. on the question ..... from the sub-court to the high court and from the high court to the federal court under the federal court (enlargement of jurisdiction) act, 1947, read with clause 39 of the letters patent (mad) and sections 109 and 110 of the cpc provided the conditions thereof were satisfied, unless that right had been taken away expressly or ..... by necessary intendment by any subsequent enactment. 15. the constitution by article 395 repealed the govt. of india act and thereby abolished the federal court. it, .....

New York Vs. Ferber

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of these films and, when viewed as a whole in a proper setting, be entitled to constitutional protection. the question whether a specific act of communication is protected by the first amendment always requires some consideration of both its content and its context. the court's holding that this respondent may not challenge new york's ..... connection to the issue of whether a child has been physically or psychologically harmed in the production of the work. similarly, a sexually explicit depiction need not be "patently offensive" in order to have required the sexual exploitation of a child for its production. in addition, a work which, taken on the whole, contains serious literary, ..... agreed that a "state offense must also be limited to works which, taken as a whole, appeal to the prurient interest in sex, which portray sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and which, taken as a whole, do not have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value." id. at 413 u. s. 24 . over .....