Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 66 amendment of section 126 Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 44 results (0.184 seconds)

Smt. Priti Parihar Vs. Kailash Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1977WLN357

..... other statutes including the letters patent. in our view, the aforesaid dictum of shah j., is applicable o the provisions of the act as well, which was connected to amend & codify the law relating to the marriages among the hindus. moreover, it will be fair to assume that by the amendments introduced in the act by the provisions of the amending act no. 68 of 1976, the ..... expressed the view that section 39 of the arbitration act restricted the right of appeal, which was otherwise available under the letters patent against the order passed by a single judge of a high court. it was pointed out by shah j. in the aforesaid case, that the arbitration act was a consolidation and amending act and as it was substantially a code relating to .....

Girdhari Lal Gupta Vs. K. Gian Chand JaIn and Co., Delhi-6

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1978Delhi146; 14(1978)DLT132

..... patents and designs. the act did not fix any particular place for the establishment of this office, but in fact it was established ..... . to arrive at the true meaning of 'high court' in the act it is best to consider the scheme of the act as originally enacted in 1911. at that time there was only one patent office maintained under 9. 55 of the act which was subsequently repealed by the amending act 39 of 197o. the said patent office was under the control of the controller general of .....

Smt. Anusua Dhirajlal Kanakia Vs. Promode Kumar Banerjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1978Cal249,82CWN313

..... 709 of 1971.2. the point involved in this case is whether after the incorporation of the amendment by the civil p. c. (amendment) act, 1976, an appeal, out of a proceeding initiated earlier would be maintainable under clause 15 of the letters patent.3. the respondent opposite parties are admittedly joint owners of premises no. 8, ashutosh mukherjee road ..... filed on may 24, 1977 i.e. after the incorporation or coming into force of the said (amending) act of 1976, which incidentally came into force on sept. 9, j97&, the right of appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent has been lost to the appellant petitioner, in view of the provisions of section 97 and more ..... the same there can be no appeal under the provisions of the letters patent as indicated in the section itself, subject to the exception as mentioned in section 97 (2) (n) of the (amending) act of 1976 viz., if any appeal is admitted under the letters patent before the coming into force of the said section 100a, the same .....

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

..... aside by the supreme court on 1-11-1976 and the case was remitted to the high court 'to hear the parties on maharashtra private forests (acquisition) (amendment) act, act 72/75, and after hearing the rival contentions of the parties the high court will pronounce its judgment'. when the matter came up for hearing before the division ..... the learned judge to take into consideration the amendments introduced by the amending act 72 of 1975 while answering questions referred to him. the learned judge declined to do so holding that such a course was not permissible on. a reference made to him under clause 36 of the letters patent. out of four points that were referred to ..... third judge for decision under clause 36 of the letters patent.5. while the matter was pending he-fore deshmukh j. as the third judge, ordinance 13 of 1975 was replaced by maharashtra act 72 of 1975 under which the parent act 29 of 1975 was further extensively amended with effect from the date of its original commencement (30 .....

Jai Hanuman Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax, ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1977P& H314; [1977]110ITR36(P& H)

..... a narrow as well as a wide meaning and that in its wider connotation it meant 'served' also. they held that the expression 'issued' occurring in section 4 of the amending act was used in its wider connotation and meant 'served'. they observed that such a construction alone would effecluate the intention of the legislature. the supreme court said :--'the crucial word ..... required to be served i under section 148 before action is taken under section 147. the contrast between the provisions of ihe 1961 act and the 1922 act becomes immediately patent. while section 34(1) of the indian income-tax act 1922, prescribed limitation for the service of the notice on the assessee, section 149 now prescribes limitation for the issuance of the notice .....

A'bad Cotton Mfg. Co. Ltd. etc. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1977)1GLR714

..... is provided for by or under any other lawfor the time being in forcexx xx'___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________section 58 (1) and (2) of the forty-second amendment act ran as under:'58. (1) notwithstanding anything contained in the constitution, every petition made under art. 226 of the constitution before the appointed day ..... change of emphasis has, of course, led to the writ jurisdiction being liberated from the technical fetters of the english law in the term 'patent errors of law on the record', because our constitutional mandate now provides this remedy for full redress of such substantial injuries as a result of ..... or vice which could not be obliterated or cured on appeal or revision. if an inferior court or tribunal of first instance acts wholly without jurisdiction or patently in excess of jurisdiction or manifestly conducts the proceedings before it in a manner which is contrary to the rules of natural .....

Whalen Vs. Roe

Court : US Supreme Court

..... just last term, in buckley v. valeo, 424 u. s. 1 , we rejected a contention that the reporting requirements of the federal election campaign act of 1971 violated the first amendment rights of those who contribute to minority parties: "but no appellant in this case has tendered record evidence. . . . instead, appellants primarily rely on ..... 347 . but those cases involve affirmative, unannounced, narrowly focused intrusions into individual privacy during the course of criminal investigations. we have never carried the fourth amendment's interest in privacy as far as the roe appellees would have us. we decline to do so now. likewise the patient appellees derive a right to ..... schedule ii drugs are medically indicated is sufficient to constitute an page 429 u. s. 604 invasion of any right or liberty protected by the fourteenth amendment. [ footnote 32 ] iii the appellee doctors argue separately that the statute impairs their right to practice medicine free of unwarranted state interference. if the .....

State of West Bengal Etc. Vs. Mir Fakir Mohammad Etc.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1977Cal285

..... although a long time has passed beyond the period of limitation prescribed by the rules before the commencement of section 38 of the amendment act of 1976, the granting of certificate under clause 15 of the letters patent 19 useless and it is barred by section 100-a of the c. p. c.8. in the result, the applications ..... high court to be heard as already indicated.7. in the present case before us although applications under clause 15 of the letters patent were filed before the commencement of the section 38 of the amendment act of 1976, no memoranda of appeal have been filed by the petitioners at all not to speak within time prescribed under rule 2 ..... in spite of section 100a coming into force shall be disposed of as if the section 38 introducing section 100a of the amendment act has not come into force. admittedly the present applications were filed under the letters patent before the coming into force of section 100-a of the code. it cannot be, however, argued that the instant applications .....

P. Ranga Redy and ors. Vs. Golla Sambasivarao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1978AP97

..... or for that matter the expression 'civil miscellaneous appeal' against an order of remand.10. section 100a c.p.c. was inserted by parliament through the civil procedure code (amendment) act, 1976. this amendment act came into force on first day of feb., 1977 as per the notification issued by the central government in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sec. (2) ..... in the first appeal. if that is so, this falls under the category of cases comprised under the second part of cl. 15 of the letters patent; but for the amended s. 100a of the c.p.c. this appeal would have fallen under the second part in which case there could have been an appeal maintainable provided ..... made before the single judge as required under r. 105 of the andhra pradesh high court appellate side rules for leave to appeal under cl. 15 of the letters patent of the high court orally and immediately after the judgment had been delivered on feb. 17, 1977.6. sri ramamohana rao, learned counsel appearing for the respondents .....

Shripatrao Dajisaheb Ghatge and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1977Bom384; (1977)79BOMLR259; 1977MhLJ406

..... . n. sharma reported in : (1965)illj433sc . thirdly counsel contended that having regard to the introduction of a new part in the constitution by the 42nd amendment act, 1976, namely part xiv-a comprising two new arts. 323a and 323b dealing with the proposed constitution of tribunals administrative tribunals for adjudication of disputes and complaints ..... article 227. secondly, we find considerable force in the contention of mr. seervai that in the context of section 58 of the 42nd amendment act, 1976 which makes the amended article 226 applicable to pending petitions filed under the original article 226 and in the absence of a similar provision in regard to pending petitions ..... factor. it may be stated that the question was not decided by reference to section 6 of the general clauses act, but upon general principles governing the question of retrospective operation of the amended letters patent- chief justice rankin in the course of judgment observed thus : (at p. 643 of air)'in this view .....