Patents Amendment Act 2005 Section 65 - Judgment Search Results

Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [2004]137STC269(MP)

..... whether amounts to manufacture within meaning of section 2 f of central excise act 1944 finance act 932 of 1994 section 65 76 b as amended on 16 6 2005 held the first limb of the inclusive ..... and law being common in both the appeals preferred under clause 10 of the letters patent they were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common order 2 the centripetal .....

Grasim Cement Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2004MP176; 2004(3)MPLJ231

..... whether amounts to manufacture within meaning of section 2 f of central excise act 1944 finance act 932 of 1994 section 65 76 b as amended on 16 6 2005 held the first limb of the inclusive ..... the learned single judge and accordingly we set aside the same 19 accordingly the letters patent appeal is allowed in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case there shall be .....

Fazal Ali Vs. Amna Khatun and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: II(2004)ACC655; 2005ACJ29; AIR2004Raj39; 2005(1)KLT828; RLW2004(3)Raj1454; 2004(1)WLC339

take away the jurisdiction of clause 15 of the letters patent in para 17 the court further took notice of the the amendment act of 1999 was kept intact 19 the amendment act 2002 has been brought into force from july 1 an appeal preferred under section 173 of the motor vehicles act is maintainable and the amended provision of section 100a cpc of the learned single judge on an appeal preferred under section 54 of the land acquisition act the three judges bench

iridium India Telecom Ltd. Vs. Motorola Inc. and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(2)BomCR530; 2004(1)MhLj532

always existed as a separate body of rules it is patent from section 2 18 that they are beyond the purview court observed the original side rules were not an a amendment made or a provision inserted in the code they always the act in other words the purpose of the amending act was to present a renovated code as the new starting written statement does not affect rule made by high court section 10 swatanter kumar c j a p deshpande smt nishita

Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Sterlite Industries (India)

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(1)ALLMR705; [2005]125CompCas14(Bom); (2004)1CompLJ358(Bom); 2004(1)MhLj1046; [2004]49SCL660(Bom)

of debts due to banks and financial institutions act 1993 patents amendment act 2002 etc it is true that no litigant provisions of the act as they stood prior to the amendment to the sebi act by amending act the unamended section by an order made by an adjudicating officer under this act may prefer an appeal to a securities appellate tribunal having act 2002 is prospective or retrospective in operation the amended section 15z came into force with effect from 29 10 2002

Pappu Venkata Laxmi and anr. Vs. Kolli Pydithalli and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(6)ALD430; 2003(5)ALT720

c p c the aggrieved party cannot file a letters patent appeal but has to institute a suit under rule 63 referred to as code as it stood prior to the amendment of 1976 and a decision in such a proceeding will the attachment of property now by virtue of the amending act of 1976 order 21 rule 58 4 provides for an a 13 orders in m c no 28 50 under section 144 cr p c exs a 14 to a 17 1st defendant as his shares were surveyed as s no 65 2 which is an extent of ac 1 93 cents

Pharmaceutical Research and Mfrs. of America Vs. Walsh

Court: US Supreme Court

c 1396 a state must also promptly file a plan amendment to reflect any m aterial changes in state law organization with its medicaid act obligations is set forth in the act itself termination of funding by the secretary petitioner must seek see ante at 652 prior authorization is one such restriction section 1396r 8 d 5 provides that a state plan may matter how modest to realizing federal medicaid goals ante at 659 majority opinion emphasis added like the plurality i believe that

Nanku Vs. Janardan Prasad

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: III(2003)ACC437; 2005ACJ136

be impressed that parliament from time to time has introduced amendments in the old act as well as in the new been omitted by section 53 of the motor vehicles amendment act 1994 and after the omission of section 166 3 there p vijayvargiya 1996 acj 1013 sc sub section 3 of section 110 a of the motor vehicles act provides no application

Ram Bahadur Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(6)ALD139; 2003(5)ALT541

management which is not understandable how the dismissal of an amendment petition in a suit would be a decision on the of adjudication before the appropriate tribunal under the industrial disputes act even though no inquiry had been undertaken earlier in the the extent indicated above no costs labour and industrial reinstatement section 10 of industrial disputes act 1947 petitioner a watchman discharged

Sri Sarjoo Prasad and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

therapy patna 6 attention was also drawn to the bihar amendments in the indian medical degrees act 1916 by which the qualification included in the schedule of the indian medical council act only entitles the person to be enrolled on a state in that state by implication the supreme court held that section 15 2 b was not exhaustive earlier in the judgment