Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 57 amendment of section 107a Year: 1989 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.120 seconds)

Aphali Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1989SC2227

..... of ayurvedic medicinal preparations, those being excluded from the definition of drug. the definition of patent and proprietary medicines till then did not apply to ayurvedic preparations. this position continued indeed till the amendment of drugs act by the drugs and cosmetics (amendment) act, 1964. several amendments were effected by that amendment act of 1964. section 33a and chapter iva were inserted. section 33a said that chapter iv ..... gallon on the strength of london proof spirit. alcohol and self-generated alcohol were treated differently.17. the schedule was amended by the amending act no. 19 of 1961 and the amended schedule stood as follows :item no.descriptionof dutiable goodsrate ofduly1.medicinalpreparations, being patent or proprietary medicines,containing alcohol and which are not capable of being consumed as ordinaryalcoholic beverages.ten percent ad valorem .....

Y. Arul Nadar Vs. the Authorised Officer, Land Reforms, Thanjavur

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1990Mad33

..... a clear contrary intention is evident in the amending act. there could not be imputation of retrospective operation to an amending act and that could he done only by the amending act either expressly or by necessary implication. but here we find that the amending act has indicated that the amendments introduced shall have only prospective operation and pending proceedings ..... sub-sec. (2) of s. 3 of the reduction act as follows :'the principal object of act xvii of 1970 is to reduce the ceiling limit ..... (i) of s.3 of the reduction act clearly shows that any action taken prior to the coming into force of the reduction act will have to continue and will take effect under the provisions of the patent act as if the parent act had not been amended by the reduction act. the learned judge alsoadverted to the implications of .....

Bhanu Prakash Agrawal Vs. Roop Chand and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1990MP198

..... civil procedure, 1908, which was inserted in that code by the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1976, under which no further appeal is to lie against the judgment of single judge of the high court in a second appeal.'we, therefore, hold that the present letters patent appeal is not maintainable in view of the bar created by the provisions of section ..... court to the effect that no appeal lay from an order of a single judge without a certificate (in the terms of section 52 of the pepsu ordinance 10 of 2005). for this conclusion, the supreme court gave the following reasons at paragraph 8 of the ruling:'(8).....it is true that under section 44 of the earlier farman a certificate ..... of the correct figure of rs. 21, 805/ 7/3.27. the learned single judge dismissed the application on 15-3-1950. at that date the pepsu ordinance 10 of 2005 was in force. in fact, it had come into force in august, 1948. section 82 of the ordinance provided that subject to any other provision of law, an appeal .....

United States Vs. Halper

Court : US Supreme Court

..... reimbursement under code "9018" for service properly reimbursable under the lower priced code "9019." see 660 f.supp. 531, 532 (sdny 1987). [ footnote 3 ] the act was amended by the false claims amendments act of 1986, pub.l. 99-562, 100 stat. 3153, to increase the civil penalty to "not less than $5,000 and not more than $10,000 ..... culpable individuals. see united states v. balint, 258 u. s. 250 , 258 u. s. 252 (1922). [ footnote 9 ] had halper been found liable under the false claims amendment act of 1986, see n 3, supra, the civil penalty against him would have amounted to more than $326,755. [ footnote 10 ] that the government seeks the civil penalty in ..... 490 u. s. 440 view of halper's previous criminal conviction and sentence, was barred by the double jeopardy clause. because it considered the act unconstitutional as applied to halper, the district court amended its judgment to limit the government's recovery to double damages of $1,170 and the costs of the civil action. id. at 855. .....

Mary Thomas Vs. Dr. K.E. Thomas

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1990Mad100; I(1991)DMC47

..... to the legislative powers of the state and they may be in all respects amended and altered. it is his contention that the provisions of the letters patent are not immutable and are certainly amenable to the new law enacted, namely, the family courts act. he referred to the decision of this court reported in official assignee of ..... respondent is that the provisions of the letters patent vesting jurisdiction on the original side of the high court to try certain matters which may fall under the explanation to s. 7 of the act, have been altered or amended or abridged by reason of the enactment of the act, that the family court would have exclusive jurisdiction ..... or extraordinary civil jurisdiction conferred by cls. 11 to 18 of the letters patenl."however, the reference to the bench became unnecessary because act 18 of 1929 was passed which amended the succession act by the insertion of the definition of "district judge" as a judge of a principal civil court of original jurisdiction.16. the facts .....

Mary Thomas and ors. Vs. Dr. K.E. Thomas and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1989)2MLJ332

..... it does not exercise its ordinary or extraordinary civil jurisdiction conferred by clauses 11 to 18 of the letters patent.however, the reference to the bench became unnecessary because act 18 of 1929 was passed which amended the succession act by the insertion of the definition of district judge' as a judge of a principal civil court of original ..... the legislative powers of the state and they may be in all respects amended and altered. it is his contention that the provisions of the letters patent are not immutable and are certainly amenable to the new law enacted, namely, the family courts act. he referred to the decision of this court reported in official assignee of ..... respondent is that the provisions of the letters patent vesting jurisdiction on the original side of the high court to try certain matters which may fall under the explanation to section 7 of the act, have been altered or amended or abridged by reason of the enactment of the act, that the family court would have exclusive .....

indica Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1991(32)ECC15; 1991LC40(Gujarat); 1990(50)ELT210(Guj); (1989)2GLR1120

..... this group of petitions, it is necessary to note a few relevant facts. all these petitioners are engaged in manufacturing patent and proprietary medicines falling under chapter 13 of the first schedule to the central excise tariff act, 1985. all of them have got necessary small scale industry registration numbers and licenses in form l - iv under ..... of the petitioners and has confirmed the demands contained in the show cause notices. these orders of the competent authority are brought in challenge by way of amendment to the petitions and they are challenged on the same grounds on which show cause notices are challenged. 6. the respondents have opposed these petitions by filing ..... be issued to the concerned assistant collector to reconsider their cases. so far as special civil application no. 3283 of 1989 is concerned, mr. soparkar has by amendment, brought the order of the assistant collector dated 6-1-1989 on record at annexure bb. the same will also stand quashed and set aside with similar .....

Ratan Lal Adukia and Another Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC104a; (1990)1CALLT25(SC); [1989]3SCR440; 1989(2)LC382(SC)

..... . reliance was also placed on section 21-a inserted by section 4 of the presidency small cause courts (west bengal amendment) act, 1980 which provides:21a. act to override other laws including letters patent : the provisions of this act shall have effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any other law, including in particular the letters ..... may be, or against the railway administration on whose railway the loss, injury, destruction or deterioration occurred.the new section 80 substituted in 1961 by the amending act provides:80. suits for compensation: a suit for compensation for loss of the life of, or personal injury to, a passenger or for loss, destruction, ..... are apprehended in their proper perspective, it becomes necessary to refer to and notice the legislative history of the provision. section 14 of the indian railways (amendment) act, 1961, substituted the old section 80 by a new provision. the old section reads:section 80 : suit for compensation for injury to through booked .....

Thomson Brandt Vs. the Controller of Patents and Designs

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi249; 1989(1)ARBLR339(Delhi); 38(1989)DLT78

..... claim of the appellant qualifies as an 'invention' and is not bit by provisions of section 3 of the act it was liable to be patented in accordance with the provisions of the act. it would also be clear from the order of the controller that the controller has not gone into the correctness ..... alleged violators'. (4) it would be appropriate at this stage to refer to provisions of section 5 of the act which lays down : section 5. inventions where only methods or processes of manufacture patentable. in the case of inventions. (a) claiming substances intended for use, or capable of being used, as food ..... patents act. 1970 is directed against the order dated 8th march, 1984 of the asstt. controller of patents & designs, new delhi (hereinafter called 'controller') whereby application patent no. 342/del/so of the appellant filed on 9th may, 1980 for grant of patent in respect of a process of manufacture was rejected. during the course of hearing before the controller the statement of claims was amended .....

Ratan Lal Adukia and anr. Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC104; JT1989(3)SC148; 1989(2)SCALE28; (1989)3SCC537

..... was also placed on section 21-a inserted by section 4 of the presidency small cause courts (west bengal amendment) act, 1980 which provides:21 a. act to override other laws including letters patent: the provisions of this act shall have effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any other law, including in particular the letters ..... case may be, or against the railway administration on whose railway the loss, injury, destruction or deterioration occurred.the new section 80 substituted in 1961 by the amending act provides:80. suits for compensation: a suit for compensation for loss of the life of, or personal injury to, a passenger or for loss, destruction, ..... are apprehended in their proper perspective, it becomes necessary to refer to and notice the legislative history of the provision. section 14 of the indian railways (amendment) act, 1961, substituted the old section 80 by a new provision. the old section reads:section 80: suit for compensation for injury to through booked traffic .....