Patents Amendment Act 2002 Section 51 - Judgment Search Results

Span Diagnostic Vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Design and anr ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: LC2009(1)22; 2008(37)PTC56(Del)

..... that vide section 18 of the patent amendment act 2002 section 25 of the principal act was amended by introducing ..... section 15 section 16 section 17 section 18 section 19 section 20 section 25 section 27 section 28 section 51 section 54 section 57 section 60 section 61 section 63 sub section 3 of section 69 section 78 section 84 section 86 section 88 3 section 89 section 93 section 96 and section .....

Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Rep. by Its Chairman and Managi ...

Court: Karnataka

..... act 1940 section 2 1 section 3 a indian patents and designs act 1911 section 2 patents act 1970 sections 2 10 5 10 13 4 64 104 107 108 patents amendment act 2002 section 104 a patent rules 2003 original suit and counterclaim revocation of patent process patent ..... provisions has not application to the patent 8217 s case 51 after the application is filed for patent chapter iv deals with publication and .....

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

..... not sustainable in the light of the amended provision of section 48 of the patents act 1970 amended act 38 of 2002 with effect from 20 05 2803 ..... accepted both the above decisions by harmoniously construing sections 51 and 53 of the designs act in the following words 33 therefore in our ..... applicant has proved the prima facie case in its favour 51 now coming to the question of infringement it is not .....

J. Mitra and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Controller of Patents and Desig. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009(1)AWC366(SC); LC2008(3)31; 2008(38)PTC6(SC); 2008(11)SCALE524; (2008)10SCC368

..... court chapter xix of the parent act as amended vide patents amendment act 1999 continued to be in operation notwithstanding the enactment of the patents amendment act 2002 and the patents amendment act 2005 as the amended sections 116 and 117a were brought into .....

Novartis Ag and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... claim for patent was made under section 5 of the act the amendment act of 1999 thus complied with article 70 8 and 9 of the trips agreement 68 three years later the patents amendment act 2002 act no 38 ..... from 38 per cent in 1952 to 68 per cent in 1970 the table above 51 however according to chaudhuri the situation changed in the 1970s several official initiatives were taken .....

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... claim for patent was made under section 5 of the act the amendment act of 1999 thus complied with article 70 8 and 9 of the trips agreement 68 three years later the patents amendment act 2002 act no 38 ..... into consideration to judge enhanced therapeutic efficacy of a pharmaceutical product in terms of section 3 d 51 186 we have taken note of the submissions made by mr grover and prof .....

Ajanta Pharma Limited Vs. the Controller General of Patents and Others

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... section 47 of the patents amendment act 2002 substituted the earlier section 116 of the original act as section ..... section 15 section 16 section 17 section 18 section 19 section 20 section 25 section 27 section 28 section 51 section 54 section 57 section 60 section 61 section 63 sub section 3 of section 69 section 78 section 84 section 86 section 88 3 section 89 section 93 section 96 and section .....

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court: Delhi

..... related aspects of intellectual property rights hereafter trips 122 by virtue of the patents amendment act 2002 section 48 of the act which specifies the rights granted to a patentee was substituted to read as ..... its jurisdiction while passing the impugned orders submissions made on behalf of ericsson in rejoinder 51 in rejoinder mr c s vaidyanathan and ms pratibha m singh learned senior advocates .....

Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Intex Technologies (India) ...

Court: Delhi

move service at tv connect in london 4 the suit patents relate to three technologies in the field of telecommunications pertaining largest telecommunications companies in the world the ericsson group is active in more than 180 countries having annual sales of usd35billion 2014 under order xxxix rule 1 and 2 read with section 151 cpc by this order i propose to decide the

Monsanto Technology Llc and Ors. Vs.nuziveedu Seeds Limited & Ors.

Court: Delhi

..... the provision contained in cs comm 132 2016 page 74 of 96 section 5 prior to its amendment in 2002 by the patents amendment act 2002 read as under claiming substances intended for the use or capable ..... much as the same would be required at the time of final adjudication of this lis 133 in the facts and circumstances noted above it is not necessary for any comment .....