Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2002 section 32 amendment of section 67 Sorted by: old Court: delhi Year: 2005 Page 9 of about 83 results (0.092 seconds)

Dec 14 2005 (HC)

Suresh Jindal Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-14-2005

Reported in : 126(2006)DLT49

..... from time to time, the indian electricity act, 1910 and the electricity (supply) act, 1948 were amended. aim was to bring in private participation. the electricity laws (amendment) act, 1998 introduced sweeping reforms.34. the electricity regulation commission act, 1998 was promulgated. the principal object of this act was to establish central and state regulatory ..... the respondent in march, 2004 it was only thereafter that the respondent could exercise powers of a licensee under the metering and billing regulations, 2002.e) as long as an existing meter correctly recorded consumption of electrical energy, it could not be replaced. till the central electricity authority notified ..... consumers have been contemplated. though the chief ministers conference held in march 2001 decided to complete the implementation of the feeder meters by december 2002, due to various reasons their procurement and installation is yet to be completed. since these feeders provide the metering at the points of bulk .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2005 (HC)

Ojas Industries P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Secretary and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-22-2005

Reported in : 2006(86)DRJ593

..... .p.)in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 29b of the industries (development and regulations) act, 1951 (65 of 1951), the central government hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the government of india in the ministry of industry (department of industrial development number s.o.477 ( ..... effect to it, vide government of andhra pradesh v. road rollers owners welfare association : (2004)6scc210 .40. in jinia keotin v. kumar sitaram manjhi : [2002]supp5scr689 , the supreme court observed:-the court cannot re-legislate on the subject under the guise of interpretation against the legislative will expressed in the enactment itself.41. ..... adopt an interpretation which would tend to do violence to the express language as well as the plain meaning and patent aim and object underlying the various other provisions of the act. even in endeavoring to maintain the object and spirit of the law to achieve the goal fixed by the legislature, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 30 2005 (TRI)

Shyam Telelink Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-30-2005

Reported in : (2006)99ITD576(Delhi)

..... hereinafter jointly and severally referred to as "shyam"). whereas, qualcomm and shyam entered into a set of related agreements as of 26-2-1998, and subsequent amendments thereto and supplemental agreements (the "project agreements") under which qualcomm was to supply shyam with a wireless local loop telephone system, related services and software, ..... and affiliates, pursuant to various contracts with them.4. during the course of assessment proceedings, a questionnaire was issued by the assessing officer on 5-10-2002 to the assessee requiring, inter alia, to furnish a "detailed note on capital reserve with nature thereof and documentary evidence". in reply, the following note ..... had released/discharged qualcomm from the project agreements thereby giving up its right to purchase/acquire the equipment/services from the said party and this act had certainly inflicted an injury to the capital structure of the assessee-company resulting in a loss of source of income. the amount in question .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //