Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Sep-23-2005
Reported in : (2006)(91)SLJ238CAT
..... is both regulatory and registration fee leviable under sections 11(2)(k) and 12(2) of the act.in zile singh v. state of haryana and ors. (supra) where disqualification corrected under section 13(a) of the haryana municipal amended act, 1994, an explanatory memorandum issued had come under scrutiny. the following observations have been made: 13. ..... by claiming negative equality.64. another ground raised is that the respondents have taken undue haste after promulgation of the amended rules in march, 2003 to hold the dpc and promote the incumbents, which act of the respondents shows a favoritism to a class depriving the vested rights of the applicants.undue haste is not by ..... itself illegal unless shown to be mala fide.after promulgation of the amended rules in 2005, the promotions are being withheld and qualified persons .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Oct-28-2005
Reported in : (2006)(1)JCR116
..... which has to be achieved and there is no differentia having reasonable nexus with the action of the respondents treating both the classes differently is patently illegal. negative equality would not come in the picture as appointments of others were also on direct recruitment basis and the ratio laid down by ..... maximum deputation extendable up to 5 years without any claim for permanent absorption or regular 'appointment as principal. in fact, respondents' letter dated 9.10.2002 shows that due to deputation of principal outsides kvs there had been a shortage of required number of principals to man the vacant posts. accordingly, ..... of justice. the administrative tribunals as established under article 323-a and the administrative tribunals act, 1985 are an alternative institutional mechanism or authority, designed to be not less effective than the high court, consistently with the amended constitutional scheme but at the same time not to negate judicial review jurisdiction of constitutional .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Oct-31-2005
Reported in : (2006)(3)SLJ196CAT
..... contention that if a small segment of officers belong belonging to group a is allowed prospective date of absorption which is different from 1.10.2000, it will be patently and perse illegal and arbitrary. this will not satisfy the test on reasonableness and the law on the said subject laid down by the hon'ble supreme court. ..... rights without the support of a valid law. the tenure cannot be taken away by rule or an act which is inconsistent with article 311(1) and (2) of the constitution, both before and after the amendment of that article. after amendment of article 311(1) a permanent government servant holds office during good behaviour and the doctrine of ..... respondents have grossly failed to evolve a comprehensive package for setting up bsnl. he further maintained that in the law laid down by the hon'ble supreme court in 2002(2) scc 333 balco employees' union (regd.) v. union of india and ors., judicial review is not completely ousted and reasonableness of the executive action can always .....
Tag this Judgment!