Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2002 section 32 amendment of section 67 Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 9,509 results (0.587 seconds)

Jan 29 2007 (HC)

K. Sathya Murthy Vs. the Secretary Ministry for Industry and Commerce ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(4)KarLJ686; 2007(4)KCCRSN260; 2007(3)AIRKarR40.

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. In response to the order and direction dated 3-11-2006 passed/issued by this Court calling upon the learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for respondent No. 1 - Government of India to respond to the article capuoned 'Medicines out of commoners reach' published hi Deccan Herald, English News Daily dated 13-7-2006, Sri. Aravind Kumar, learned Assistant Solicitor General on instructions submits that the proposal for possible amendment to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1949 (for short the Act'] has not been carried out; that the Act has not been amended so far as was apprehended in the article; that, in fact, in the light of considerable resistance from the various departments of the Government, as indicated in the very article, the meeting itself had not taken place and therefore no decision of the Government was taken for the purpose of amending the Act on the lines indicated in the article.2. Sri. Muralidharan, learned Counsel for respondent No. 3 s...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2011 (HC)

Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Rep. by Its Chairman and Managi ...

Court : Karnataka

..... year 2004 complaining of the infringement of the said registered patent. section 104-a of the patents act, 1970 was inserted by way of patent amendment act, 2002 with effect from 20.5.2003. the same is applicable to the present suit. burden of proof 59. section 104-a provides for burden of proof in case of suits concerning infringement, which reads as under: section 104-a. burden of proof in case of suits concerning infringement.-(1) in any suit for infringement of a patent, where the subject matter of patent is a process for obtaining a product, the court may direct ..... provided by them and the sample frlht i.e., 7 samples in total. further they wanted comparison of the chemical profiles of zigbir, livoliv and the formulation prepared by the frlht. frlht laboratory report 67. ex.p-31 is the report of the frlht. it reads as under:- frlht laboratory report frlht foundation for revitalisation of local traditions 74/2 jarokabande kaval, attur post via yelahanka bangalore ..... seek accounts of the profits made by defendant by selling livoliv-250 for ascertaining the damages payable for violation of the patent rights? if so, what is the quantum of damages the plaintiff is entitled to? 3. whether the defendant proves that the product of the plaintiff zigbir is not legally a patentable product and the registration of patent is illegal? if so, is the registration of the plaintiffs patent to be cancelled? 32. by order dated 11.08.2005, sri. n.s. sangolli, retd. district judge, was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 1993 (HC)

Mrs. Laxmi Bai and Others Vs. Kamalaksha G. Nayak and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1994Kant174; ILR1993KAR1936; 1993(2)KarLJ419

ORDER1. This revision petition is filed by defendants 1 to 4 in O.S. 201 of 1985, on the file of the I Additional Civil Judge, Mangalore against his order dated 24th September, 1992, allowing I.A. No. VIII and permitting the plaintiff (1st respondent herein) to amend the plaint, as sought for by him.2. Respondents 2 to 4 herein are defendants 5 to 7 in the lower Court. For the purpose of convenience the parties will be referred to by the rank they hold in the lower Court.3. The facts, giving raise to this petition, may briefly be stated as hereunder:The plaintiff filed a suit in O.S. 201/85, on the file of the Civil Judge, Mangalore, against the defendants, who are the wife and children of one late K. Rama Rao for a declaration that he is entitled to continue in possession of the suit property by virtue of part performance of an agreement to sell dated 5-5-1978 executed by Rama Rao and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his possession of the sui...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

All India Gaming Federation Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.18703/2021 (GM-POLICE) C/W WRIT PETITION NOS.18729/2021, 18732/2021, 18733/2021, 18738/2021, 18803/2021, 18942/2021, 19241/2021, 19271/2021, 19322/2021, 19450/2021, 22371/2021 (GM-POLICE) IN W.P.NO.18703/2021: BETWEEN: ALL INDIA GAMING FEDERATION A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT1860REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY AND AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR SUNIL KRISHNAMURTHY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT TIFFANY, 1ST FLOOR, HIRANANDANI ROAD, HIRANANDANI ESTATE, GHODBUNDER ROAD, PATILPADA, THANE WEST, MAHARSHTRA -400 607. PETITIONER (BY SRI.C ARYAMA SUNDARAM, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. PRADEEP NAYAK,ADVOCATE MS. ANUPAMA HEBBAR,ADVOCATE SRI. SANKEERTH VITTAL, ADVOCATE , SRI. SIDDHARTH AIYANNA, ADVOCATE SRI. DHEERAJ MURTHY, ADVOCATE MS. ROHINI MUSA, ADVOCATE SRI. VIDUSHP...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Shri Pavan Nanda Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.18703/2021 (GM-POLICE) C/W WRIT PETITION NOS.18729/2021, 18732/2021, 18733/2021, 18738/2021, 18803/2021, 18942/2021, 19241/2021, 19271/2021, 19322/2021, 19450/2021, 22371/2021 (GM-POLICE) IN W.P.NO.18703/2021: BETWEEN: ALL INDIA GAMING FEDERATION A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT1860REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY AND AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR SUNIL KRISHNAMURTHY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT TIFFANY, 1ST FLOOR, HIRANANDANI ROAD, HIRANANDANI ESTATE, GHODBUNDER ROAD, PATILPADA, THANE WEST, MAHARSHTRA -400 607. PETITIONER (BY SRI.C ARYAMA SUNDARAM, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. PRADEEP NAYAK,ADVOCATE MS. ANUPAMA HEBBAR,ADVOCATE SRI. SANKEERTH VITTAL, ADVOCATE , SRI. SIDDHARTH AIYANNA, ADVOCATE SRI. DHEERAJ MURTHY, ADVOCATE MS. ROHINI MUSA, ADVOCATE SRI. VIDUSHP...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Play Games 24x7 Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.18703/2021 (GM-POLICE) C/W WRIT PETITION NOS.18729/2021, 18732/2021, 18733/2021, 18738/2021, 18803/2021, 18942/2021, 19241/2021, 19271/2021, 19322/2021, 19450/2021, 22371/2021 (GM-POLICE) IN W.P.NO.18703/2021: BETWEEN: ALL INDIA GAMING FEDERATION A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT1860REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY AND AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR SUNIL KRISHNAMURTHY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT TIFFANY, 1ST FLOOR, HIRANANDANI ROAD, HIRANANDANI ESTATE, GHODBUNDER ROAD, PATILPADA, THANE WEST, MAHARSHTRA -400 607. PETITIONER (BY SRI.C ARYAMA SUNDARAM, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. PRADEEP NAYAK,ADVOCATE MS. ANUPAMA HEBBAR,ADVOCATE SRI. SANKEERTH VITTAL, ADVOCATE , SRI. SIDDHARTH AIYANNA, ADVOCATE SRI. DHEERAJ MURTHY, ADVOCATE MS. ROHINI MUSA, ADVOCATE SRI. VIDUSHP...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Head Digital Works Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.18703/2021 (GM-POLICE) C/W WRIT PETITION NOS.18729/2021, 18732/2021, 18733/2021, 18738/2021, 18803/2021, 18942/2021, 19241/2021, 19271/2021, 19322/2021, 19450/2021, 22371/2021 (GM-POLICE) IN W.P.NO.18703/2021: BETWEEN: ALL INDIA GAMING FEDERATION A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT1860REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY AND AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR SUNIL KRISHNAMURTHY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT TIFFANY, 1ST FLOOR, HIRANANDANI ROAD, HIRANANDANI ESTATE, GHODBUNDER ROAD, PATILPADA, THANE WEST, MAHARSHTRA -400 607. PETITIONER (BY SRI.C ARYAMA SUNDARAM, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. PRADEEP NAYAK,ADVOCATE MS. ANUPAMA HEBBAR,ADVOCATE SRI. SANKEERTH VITTAL, ADVOCATE , SRI. SIDDHARTH AIYANNA, ADVOCATE SRI. DHEERAJ MURTHY, ADVOCATE MS. ROHINI MUSA, ADVOCATE SRI. VIDUSHP...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Galactus Funware Technology Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnatka

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.18703/2021 (GM-POLICE) C/W WRIT PETITION NOS.18729/2021, 18732/2021, 18733/2021, 18738/2021, 18803/2021, 18942/2021, 19241/2021, 19271/2021, 19322/2021, 19450/2021, 22371/2021 (GM-POLICE) IN W.P.NO.18703/2021: BETWEEN: ALL INDIA GAMING FEDERATION A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT1860REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY AND AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR SUNIL KRISHNAMURTHY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT TIFFANY, 1ST FLOOR, HIRANANDANI ROAD, HIRANANDANI ESTATE, GHODBUNDER ROAD, PATILPADA, THANE WEST, MAHARSHTRA -400 607. PETITIONER (BY SRI.C ARYAMA SUNDARAM, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. PRADEEP NAYAK,ADVOCATE MS. ANUPAMA HEBBAR,ADVOCATE SRI. SANKEERTH VITTAL, ADVOCATE , SRI. SIDDHARTH AIYANNA, ADVOCATE SRI. DHEERAJ MURTHY, ADVOCATE MS. ROHINI MUSA, ADVOCATE SRI. VIDUSHP...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Saroj Kumar Panigrahi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.18703/2021 (GM-POLICE) C/W WRIT PETITION NOS.18729/2021, 18732/2021, 18733/2021, 18738/2021, 18803/2021, 18942/2021, 19241/2021, 19271/2021, 19322/2021, 19450/2021, 22371/2021 (GM-POLICE) IN W.P.NO.18703/2021: BETWEEN: ALL INDIA GAMING FEDERATION A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT1860REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY AND AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR SUNIL KRISHNAMURTHY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT TIFFANY, 1ST FLOOR, HIRANANDANI ROAD, HIRANANDANI ESTATE, GHODBUNDER ROAD, PATILPADA, THANE WEST, MAHARSHTRA -400 607. PETITIONER (BY SRI.C ARYAMA SUNDARAM, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. PRADEEP NAYAK,ADVOCATE MS. ANUPAMA HEBBAR,ADVOCATE SRI. SANKEERTH VITTAL, ADVOCATE , SRI. SIDDHARTH AIYANNA, ADVOCATE SRI. DHEERAJ MURTHY, ADVOCATE MS. ROHINI MUSA, ADVOCATE SRI. VIDUSHP...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2011 (HC)

Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Rep. by Its Chairman and Managi ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2012(4)CTC(IP)8; 2012(3)KCCR140(SN)

(Prayer: This O.S. filed under Order VII Rule 1 of CPC before the City Civil & Sessions Court, Bangalore District, Bangalore, registered as Original Suit No.7801/2003 and transferred to the High Court of Karnataka, praying to the pass a judgment and decree against the defendants as under: a) for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and/or their licensee, nominees, agents, suppliers, dealers, consignees or any one acting directing or indirectly on their behalf from manufacturing and/or producing and/or selling of the products LIVOLIV-250 by infringing the plaintiffs protected patent rights under patent No.186857 of 20th April 1998 granted A method of preparing a Herbal Hepatoprotective and Anthiepatotoxic Composition in the market throughout India and etc.)1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from manufacturing, producing or selling of the product Livoliv-250 by infringing the plaintiffs protected Patent rights u...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //