Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 150 security for costs Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 496 results (1.445 seconds)

Ramdhan Vs. Bhanwarlal

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1985Raj185; 1983()WLN439

..... security for costs and even for execution of orders for costs and where no specific provision has been made in part vi, the provisions of the code of civil procedure should be resorted to, by virtue of the provisions contained in section 87 of the act. apart from the provisions of the code of civil procedure and the provisions of the evidence act, the provisions of other laws cannot be made applicable to election petitions, including section 18 of the ordinance. 59. we may also refer to one more factor in this respect. sub-section (2) of section ..... whether a letters patent appeal could be maintained against an order passed in appeal under section 39(1) of the arbitration act, 1940 by a single judge of the high court. sub-section (1) of section 39 provides a right of appeal in resepct of the matters specified therein. the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 39 are significant inasmuch ..... lallubhai mehta (1971) 12 guj lr 850 and by the madras high court in kadiravan v. r, thirumalaikumar ilr (1970) 2 mad 183. we are in respectful agreement with the views expressed by the aforesaid two high courts so far as ..... cl 15 of the letters patent there being nothing to the contrary in the trade marks act'........... 'the rights created by the trade marks act are civil rights for the protection of persons carrying on trade under marks which have acquired reputation. the statute creates the registrar a tribunal for safeguarding these rights and for giving effect to the rights created by the act .....

Watt Vs. Western Nuclear, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc. - 462 U.S. 36 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc., 462 U.S. 36 (1983) Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc. No. 81-1686 Argued January 17, 1983 Decided June 6, 1983 462 U.S. 36 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus The Stock-Raising Homestead Act of 1916 (SRHA) provided for the settlement of homesteads on lands the surface of which was "chiefly valuable for grazing and raising forage crops." Section 9 of the SRHA reserved to the United States title to "all the coal and minerals" in lands patented under the Act. When respondent mining company acquired a fee interest in land covered by a patent under the Act, it proceeded to remove gravel from a pit located on the land to use in paving streets and sidewalks in a company town where its workers lived. The Bureau of Land Management then notified respondent, and later determined, after a hearing, that the removal of the gravel constituted a trespa...

Tobu Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Camco Industries Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1984Cal24

M.M. Dutt, J.1. The appellant Tobu Enterprises Private Limited has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated Jan. 25, 1983 of a learned single Judge of this Court granting leave to the respondent, Cameo Industries Limited, under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent to file an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940; the said application has since been registered as a suit being Special Suit No. 3A of 1983.2. By an agreement in writing dated Nov. 1, 1980 entered into in Calcutta within the ordinary original jurisdiction of this Court between the appellant and the respondent, it was agreed that the appellant would appoint the respondent its distributor of Children Vehicles produced by it. In the said agreement, the appellant was the first party and the respondent was the second party. The agreement, inter alia, provides as follows :'(1). The agreement can be terminated by a notice of three months in writ-Ing from either side. (2). The First Party will give t...

Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1985Mad130

Padmanabhan, J. 1. The following quetion has been referred for the opinion of a Division Bench of this Court by Kader J. -'Whether S. 80 of the Railways Act as amended excludes the operation of S. 20 of the Civil P.C.- and Cl. 12 of the Letters Patent?'The question has arisen for consideration in the following circumstances. The first plaintiff is a company incorporated Linder the Companies Act, having the registered office at Bangalore and carrying on business at Kalarnassery, Ernakulam. The second plaintiff is a registered society carrying qn business at P.W. Satsung Bihar. The third plaintiff is the insurer who has settled the claims of the second plaintiff and got subrogated to the rights, having its registered office at Madras. A consignment of one case containing HNIT printing machine Letter Press Atesa/RTE 1052, was entrusted by the first plaintiff to the first defendant Southern Railway administration at Cochin Harbour terminus for being delivered to the second plaintiff at Bai...

Hensley Vs. Eckerhart

Court : US Supreme Court

..... title vi of the civil rights act of 1964, . . . the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the united states, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs." civil rights attorney's fees awards act of 1976, 90 stat. 2641. section 1988 was drafted based on congress ..... litigation. see id. at 192-193 (treatment plans), 190-191 (staff); compare deposition of h. bratkowski 12-13, 39, reprinted in brief in opposition 8, n. 10, 12, with app. 106-114, 120-121 (increase in staff during ..... unit of the fulton state hospital in fulton, mo. the forensic unit consists of two residential buildings for housing patients who are dangerous to themselves or others. maximum-security patients are housed in the marion o. biggs building for the criminally insane. the rest of the patients reside in the less restrictive rehabilitation unit. in 1972 ..... granted any relief." house report 8 (citing parham v. southwestern bell telephone co., 433 f.2d 421 (ca8 1970), and reed v. arlington hotel co., 476 f.2d 721 (ca8 1973)). note that, in reed, the court of appeals ..... attorneys claimed 2,985 hours worked and sought payment at rates varying from $40 to $65 per hour. this amounted to approximately $150,000. respondents also requested that the fee be enhanced by 30 to 50 percent, for a total award of somewhere between $195,000 and $225, ..... of reasonableness," or unless the explanation articulated is patently inadequate. cf. permian basin area rate cases, 390 u. s. 747 , 390 u. s. 767 (1968). .....

V. Ponnusamv and ors. Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1984Mad156; (1983)IIMLJ459

Mohan, J. 1. These writ petitions challenge the validity of the Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act. 1971 (Tamil Nadu Act I I of 1971). (Throughout the course' of our Judgment. it will be referred to as the Act).2. Since an identical point is in issue in all these writ petitions. It is enough if we refer to the facts in W. P. No. 140 of 1979 alone. The Petitioner purchased a portion of the, 'rodent in R. S. No. 3969/11. TondiarDet. Madras from one A. Sundararaian. for a sum of R3. 6.400 for the of constructing therein a residential house for his living. After raising a loan from his provident fund. The Petitioner made necessary arrangements for the construction of the house. Owing to some technical difficulties. The construction could not be taken our immediately. There is an oven solace in R. S. No. 3968/2 which is described as Keri Thottarn.3. The Tamil Nadu glum Clearance Board. Madras. wanted to acquire this proverty. known as Keerai Thottam. for the nurvose of th...

Balveer Singh and ors. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1983WLN(UC)476

Dwarka Prasad Gupta, J.1. In this petition the petitioners have challenged the validity of the order of the Board of Revenue for Rajasthan at Ajmer dated August 28, 1972.2. The petitioner filed a suit for possession Under Section 183 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') on October 4, 1958 in the court of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Phalodi, alleging that agricultural lands comprised in Khasra Nov 62 and 62/1, including the Pipalia well situated in village Kotra, Tehsil Osian District Jodhpur was under the tenancy of the plaintiffs, who held a 'Bapi Patta' dated December 4, 1942 in respect of the aforesaid agricultural lands, including the Pipalia well. Defendant Bhura was allowed by means of an agreement dated September 12, 1950, produced in the court of the Assistant Collector, Jodhpur, to continue to remain in possession of the agricultural lands in question as a sub-tenant thereof for a period of two years. The plaintiffs alleged that after the e...

W.H. Targett and Co. Ltd. Vs. Wall Street Investment P. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1986]59CompCas335(Cal)

Dipak Kumar Sen, J.1. W.H. Targett and Co. Ltd., the petitioner, seeks to transfer about 1 bigha, 5 cottahs and 19 sq. ft. land in premises No. 20; Burdwan Road, Calcutta, to Wall Street Investment P. Ltd. against allotment of a number of shares of the latter in favour of the former by way of an arrangement under Chap. 3 of the Companies Act, 1956.2. The present application under Sections 391(2), 392 and 394 of the said Act was moved on September 24, 1982, pursuant whereto meetings of the shareholders of the two companies were held. The shareholders of both the companies approved the arrangement unanimously.3. It is now prayed that the arrangement may be sanctioned by this court with effect from April 1, 1982, and that consequential directions in respect thereof be made in favour of the said Wall Street Investment P. Ltd. and that the latter be directed to issue and allot 40,000 equity shares of Rs. 100 each credited as fully paid up to W. H. Targett & Co. Ltd. In the petition it is, i...

Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh Vs. Andhra Pradesh Police W ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1983)37CTR(AP)294; [1984]148ITR287(AP)

Seetharama Reddy, J. 1. The question for decision in this reference at the instance of the Revenue, is : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law in holding that the interest income of Rs. 1,98,791 is exempt from income-tax for the assessment year 1975-76 ?' 2. Before the above question was sought to be referred to this court at the instance of the Revenue, M.P. No. 63/79 was filed by the assessee before the Appellate Tribunal for giving a decision with respect to the sum of Rs. 1,98,791 which accrued as interest out of the principal sum of Rs. 56,97,657 which the Welfare Society-assessee-kept in a bank. This arose because of the fact that earlier in I.T.A.No. 595/79, which pertained to the principal sum which stood in the name of the assessee-society in a bank as a sequel to the raffle conducted on behalf of the society by the Government, one of the issues framed was : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and o...

Jairamdas Guru Paltudas Vs. Swami Satyaramdasji Guru Sdhandasji

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1983)85BOMLR503

S.J. Deshpande, J.1. First Appeal Nos. 610 and 611 of 1975 arise out of a common judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane in Special Civil Suit No. 52 of 1972. First Appeal No. 7W of 1977 arises out of an order passed by the City Civil Court in Charity Application No. 23 of 1973 under Section 72 of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). , As the common question in regard to the title of Mahant to be a trustee of the disputed trust is involved, all these matters are taken together for hearing.2. The facts leading to First Appeal No. 610 of 1975 may be stated as follows:In the City of Bombay, there is a public charitable trust, known as 'Shree Kabirwadi Mandir Trust', having its registered office at Grant Road, which was registered at P.T.R- No. 1-2553 (Bombay) on January 5, 1962. One Paitudas Guru Sevadasji was the Mahant of the said Kabir Wadi Mandir. He was administrating the trust and managing the trust properties. Paitu...