Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 150 security for costs Year: 1970 Page 1 of about 810 results (1.970 seconds)

Rustom Cavasjee Cooper Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC564; [1970]40CompCas325(SC); (1970)1SCC248; [1970]3SCR530

..... were also asked to maintain a percentage of their assets in cash or approved securities. thereafter the indian companies (amendment) act was passed in 1942 by which a proviso was added to section 277f to the effect that any company which used as part of its ..... court will be able to go into it. by the word 'illusory' is meant something which is obvious, patent and shocking. if for a property worth rs. 1 lakh compensation is fixed at rs. 100 that ..... stand the test the adequacy of the product falls outside justification'. in metal corporation case : [1967]1scr255 compensation was to be equated to the cost price in the case of unused machinery in good condition and written down value as understood in income-tax law was to be the value of the ..... v. the state of orissa : [1969]3scr374 vrajlal manilal & co. and anr. v. the state of madhya pradesh and ors. : [1970]1scr400 and municipal committee, amritsar and ors. v. state of punjab and ors. : [1969]3scr447 . these cases dealt with the validity ..... upon the statement in halsbury's laws of england, 3rd edn.. vol 2, article 270 at pp. 150 & 151 that:a 'banker' is an individual partnership or corporation, whose sole or predominating business is banking, that is the receipt of money ..... 1952]1scr889 spoke of public purpose in the background of article 39 which speaks of the directive principles. article. 39 enacts that the state shall in particular direct its policy towards securing that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community .....

V.N. Narayanan Nair and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1971Ker98

Raman Nayar, C.J. 1. The Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (Act 1 of 1964) as originally enacted (the original Act as we shall call it) finds a place in the NinthSchedule to the Constitution -- see Item 39 -- and therefore has the protection of Article 31-B. It has been amended three times, first by Act 12 of 1966, then by Act 9 of 1967, and now by Act 55 of 1969, the amendments made by the last mentioned Act (which we shall call the amending Act) being far-reaching. (To the 132 sections in the original Act, over 50 new sections have been added while over 60 sections have been amended. To the 62 definitions 10 have been added while 20 have been amended. The amended Act is therefore virtually a new piece of legislation). The first of these was enacted by the President while the remaining two have received his as sent -- it has been contended not in the free and proper exercise of his judgment, but, of course, we cannot go into that-- but none of them has been included in the Ninth Schedule....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. P. Krishna Warrier

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1972]84ITR119(Ker)

Govindan Nair, J. 1. On the application of the Commissioner of Income-tax, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras Bench ' B ', drew up a statement of the case and have referred the following questions for our decision.' 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the objects of the Arya Vaidya Sala constitute a charitable purpose within the meaning of Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to exemption on the 25% of the profits devoted to the development of Arya Vaidya Sala ? 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in deleting the additions of the sums of Rs. 8,331 and Rs. 27,506 made in the assessment year 1962-63 and Rs. 7,678 and Rs. 36,224 made in the assessment year 1963-64? ' 2. This reference is a composite one and relates to income-tax of the income of an institution known as the Arya Vaidya Sala for the two assessment y...

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. United Bank of India Ltd. and ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1970Cal513,[1971]41CompCas603(Cal)

S.K. Mukherjea, J.1. The question which has to be decided in this appeal is whether a nominee under a life insurance policy can validly assign the claim in respect of the policy after the holder of the policy dies but before the policy matures. It also raises a larger question namely whether a nominee can assign the claim under the policy or surrender the policy at all.2. One Narayan Chandra Ghosh, a person considerably advanced in age, took out a policy of insurance on January 24, 1947, by payment of a single premium of Rupees 15,000/-. Under the policy a sum of Rs. 33,000/- was payable on January 17, 1978 to the assured or his nominees, executors, administrators or other representatives-in-interest as the case might be. It is not without significance that the moneys payable under the policy were payable not on the death of the assured but at a fixed date. Moreover, as only one single premium was payable there was no question of premiums ceasing to be payable on the death of the assur...

H.H. Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao Jivaji Rao ScIndia Bahadur of Gwalior ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1971SC530; (1971)1SCC85; [1971]3SCR9

..... act 1957 sections 2(p) and 5(1)(iii), gift tax act 1958 section 5(1)(xiv), hindu succession act, 1956 section 5(iii), income-tax act 1922 section 4(3)(x); income-tax act 1961 section 10(19), estate duty act 1953, section ..... hearing fee in those petitions in which the petitioners have appeared through the same counsel.mitter, j.150. on the 6th september, 1970 there was issued in the name of the president an order of the following text:151. 'in exercise of the powers vested ..... into a covenant on the terms mentioned therein as they were convinced that the welfare of the people of the region could best be secured by the establishment of a state with a common executive, legislature and judiciary, and they were resolved to entrust to a constituent assembly consisting ..... the president the right to confer that status on a ruler by recognition. this result was reached by treaties, covenants and agreements.39. the source or origin of paramountcy of the crown was not the treaties, sanads or agreements. there were no paramountcy ..... to be so. in consequence a writ of mandamus shall issue not to enforce the orders. the petitions are allowed with costs.shah, j.83. on august 15, 1947, maharajadhiraja jivaji rao scindia of gwalior-hereinafter called ' ..... prevented by promissory estoppel and had acted in breach of a fiduciary duty.32. in the reply affidavit filed by mr. asoka sen (joint secretary in the ministry of home affairs) all the allegations and submissions (besides the patent facts) were denied. the .....

The Gwalior Agriculture Co. Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and o ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1971MP51; 1970MPLJ331

Surajbhan, J. 1. This is a writ petition by the Gwalior Agriculture Company, Limited, Dabra (hereinafter called the Company) under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the validity of the Madhya Pradesh Sinchai (Jal Kar Manyatakaran) Adhiniyam 1964 (Act No. 27 of 1964), (hereinafter called the Act of 1964) for the reasons mentioned in paragraph 10 of the petition, and praying for the issuance of a suitable writ and direction restraining the respondents from recovering the charges and penalty imposed on the petitioner under the aforesaid Act of 1964 and for such incidental reliefs as may be found proper.2. The petitioner is a registered company at Dabra and is engaged in the cultivation of sugar-cane besides other crop. Prior to the merger of the United States of Gwalior, Indore and Malwa (i.e. the erstwhile State of Madhya Bharat) into the new State of Madhya Pradesh, the State of Madhya Bharat had passed the Irrigation Act, Samvat 2007 (Act No. 39 of 1950) (h...

Choctaw Nation Vs. Oklahoma

Court : US Supreme Court

Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma - 397 U.S. 620 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma, 397 U.S. 620 (1970) Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma No. 41 Argued October 22-23, 1969 Reargued March 5, 197 Decided April 27, 1970 * 397 U.S. 620 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Under various treaties (including the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek in 1830 between the United States and the Choctaws and the Treaty of New Echota in 1835 between the United States and the Cherokees) and patents issued thereunder, petitioner Indian Nations are held, contrary to the claims of the State of Oklahoma and other respondents, to have received title to the land underlying the navigable portion of the Arkansas River from its confluence with the Grand River in Oklahoma to the Oklahoma-Arkansas border. Pp. 397 U. S. 628 -636. 402 F.2d 739, reversed and remanded. Page 397 U. S. 621 MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court. These cases...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. S. Raghbir Singh Trust

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1971]80ITR515(P& H)

D.K. Mahajan, J.1. This reference relates to the assessment year 1954-55--the account year ending on March 31, 1954. The assessee is S. Raghbir Singh Trust, District Amritsar, Raja Sansi (hereinafter referred to as 'the Trust').2. The relevant facts, necessary for the determination of the question of law that has been referred for our opinion, may now be stated. S. Raghbir Singh (hereinafter referred to as 'assessee') was originally a member of the joint Hindu family consisting of himself, his sons and his wife. This family disrupted on the 10th of April, 1953. The assets of the family were partitioned. S. Raghbir Singh received 400 shares of Simbhaoli Sugar Mills P. Ltd. among other assets of the joint Hindu family, as his share. He was also assigned the obligation to pay off a debt of nearely four lakhs of rupees which had been contracted by the joint Hindu family and was due to Rai Bahadur Seth Jessa Ram Fateh Chand. On the 14th of April, 1953, the assessee executed a deed of trust,...

The Notified Area Committee and anr. Vs. Sri Ram Singhasan Prasad Kalw ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1970All561

..... brought about by the u.p. high courts (amalgamation) order, 1948. this order was issued by the governor-general under section 229 of the government of india act, 1935.12. from july 26, 1948 the letters patent ceased to have effect in virtue of cl 17(a) of the order. clause 9 of the order, however, provided that the law in force on july 25, 1948 'with ..... scr 100 : [1967]2scr100 and janapada sabha, chhindwara v. the central provinces syndicate ltd., c.a. no. 134 of 1967, d/-23-2-1970 (sc). none of these cases has any bearing on the issue before us.42. it is also urged that while a town area committee is not a legal ..... legislature passed an amending act (act no. 23 of 1950) in july, 1950. section 3 of this act added clause (f) to section 14 in these terms:'a tax on persons assessed according to their circumstances and property ......... provided that such a person is not already assessed under 'clauses (a) to (e)above.' 5. section 5 of the amending act added clause fee) to section 39(2) for enabling the ..... the said date, from its funds shall continue to be so incurred by the board as if it was an expenditure authorised by or under this act; (iii) all property including the rights or benefit subsisting under any deed, contract, bond, security or chose in action vested in the town area or notified area, as the case may be, on the date immediately preceding the said date, shall be ..... the judgment of the learned single judge and dismiss the writ petition of the respondent with costs. .....

Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1971Cal150

ORDERS.C. Deb, J.1.This suit was filed by the plaintiff with leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent on 12th September, 1963, claiming Rs. 26,721/- as outstanding balance of freight payable by the defendant with interest thereon in respect of a cargo of coal carried by the plaintiff in Voyage No. 31 by the vessel 'JAG SEVAK'.2. In the plaint it is, inter alia, alleged that the Chief Commercial Superintendent of Eastern Railway Administration on behalf of the defendant shipped 7730 metric tons of steam coal on board the plaintiff's said vessel 'JAG SEVAK' for being carried by the plaintiff from the port of Calcutta and for being delivered at the Port of Cochin to the Southern Railway Administration of the defendant. The plaintiff duly carried the said cargo by that vessel under a Bill of Lading dated November 10, 1960 and duly delivered those goods to the defendant's said Railway Administration at the Port of destination on 25th November, 1960.Under the Bill of Lading the total frei...