Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 150 security for costs Court: karnataka Page 65 of about 853 results (0.181 seconds)

Hemavathi Shivashankar. Vs. Dr. Tumkur S Shivashankar and anr.

Court : Karnataka

..... was observed that the rules of private international law in india are not codified and are scattered in different enactments such as the contract act, indian succession act, indian divorce act, the special marriage act etc. in matters of status or legal capacity of natural persons, matrimonial disputes, custody of children, adoption, testamentary and intestate succession ..... within the jurisdiction of the said court.he has also drawn attention to the hague convention on the recognition and enforcement of divorces and legal separations, 1970, the important features of which have been extracted in the book conflict of laws by atul setalvad, which convention has been adopted by 18 countries ..... respondent contended that the execution was under section 44a of the cpc and as such there was no requirement to observe the provisions of sections, 38, 39 and 40 of the cpc. the appellants, therefore, filed another application stating that the decree was not on merits and as per the provisions of section .....

M/S. L and T Komatsu Ltd., Bangalore, Rep. by Its Assistant General Ma ...

Court : Karnataka

..... to be prohibited. now, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1) of section 10 of the contract labour (regulation and abolition) act, 1970 (central act 37 of 1970) the government of karnataka having regard to the conditions of work and benefits provided for the contract labour and other relevant factors such as those referred ..... because it feels that another policy decision would have been fairer or wiser more scientific or logical. the court can interfere only if the policy decision is patently arbitrary discriminatory or mala fide. in narmada bacho andolan vs. union of india reported in (2000) 10 scc 664, the supreme court held that it ..... . exercise of power of a subordinate legislation will be prospective and cannot be retrospective unless the statute authorises such an exercise expressly or by necessary implication. 39. the principle laid down in section 21 is of general application. the power to rescind mentioned in section 21 is without limitations or conditions. it is .....

Subramanya Vs. Chairman and Managing Director

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR3434

..... have been framed in exercise of the powers vested in the respondent-bank under section 19 of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970. a plain reading of these regulations shows that they entirely deal with what the officer employees of the respondent-bank should or should not do. ..... . appearing on behalf of the petitioner mr. krishnaiah learned counsel, strenuously urged that the order of punishment imposed upon the petitioner suffered from a patent perversity in that even if the allegations made against the petitioner were taken as proved, the same did not amount to misconduct so as to ..... in office.'11. the black's law dictionary, 6th edition, 'misconduct' has been described thuds:'a transgression of some established and definite rule of action, a forbidden act, a dereliction from duty, unlawful behavior, wilful in character, improper or wrong behavior, its synonyms are misdemeanour, misdeed, misbehavior, delinquency, impropriety, mismanagement, offence, but .....

Amit Vikram Raina and anr. Vs. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College and o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004(6)KarLJ590

..... for the session 1997-98 should be filled up from amongst the eligible candidates as enlisted in the merit list. the said order was maintained in letters patent appeals filed by the controller of examination, with certain modifications. the executive committee of mci at its meeting held on 14-9-1999 refused permission to ..... of 1997-98 session after 18 months as that would amount to increasing the intake capacity and would be contrary to the provisions of medical council of india act. acting on the communication of the mci, the controller of examination, cancelled the admissions of four students, including madhu singh, who had got admission and consequently ..... due rs. 7,00,000/-24.31048/2003nilayasennotstatednot admitted to the5,99,750/-not admitted to thecourse25.31253/2003jyothisusan thomas20,00,000/-20,00,000/-2,39,250/-due nil26.33934/2003manpreetanand16,00,000/-10,00,000/-nilnot admitted to thecourse27.33935/2003d'sasideny xaviernotstated10,00,000/-5,000/-not admitted to thecourse28.33936 .....

Smt. Susheelamma, W/O Hanumanthrao Deshpande and ors. Vs. State of Kar ...

Court : Karnataka

..... said company had, in turn, sold the lease-hold rights in favour of the karnataka co-operative textile mills limited, dharwad, a co-operative society; in the year 1970 the lands were sub-leased in favour of m/s g. mahadevappa and sons, a firm. in the year 1978, the mills closed down. in the year 1986 ..... the apex court as regards legislation which contemplates the acquisition of property by the stale in public interest is without question, in order to give effect to article 39(b) of the constitution of india and is hence protected by article 31c of the constitution of india. the authorities cited above are also to support the ..... 20 years. that would be most arbitrary, unreasonable and a negation of history.therefore, it is patent that the impugned legislation is a nullity. accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed. the karnataka co-operative textile mills (acquisition and transfer) amendment) act 2004; (act no. 20s of) is null and void as the same is inconsistent with the constitution of .....

The Central Bank of India, a Body Corporate Constituted Under the Prov ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008(5)KCCRSN651

..... application submitted by national trades and agencies by the traffic manager, kochi port trust. ex.p.26 is an entry bill, ex.p.27 a bill issued by the acting division manager of national insurance co. ltd. to the corporation. ex.p.28 is a receipt issued by national insurance co. ltd., for having received payment from the ..... d. has been credited to the account m/s. nelsa enterprises (p) ltd.yours faithfully,sd./-sranch manager.17. since the corporation became aware that the bank had acted contrary to its communication and the sum of rs. 4,13,000/-was not utilised for the payment of customs duty in respect of the imported machinery which was lying ..... - corporation with regard to the loan sanctioned to the second respondent - company for its entity was such that it constituted the appellant - bank a trustee so as to act in a fiduciary capacity in order to ensure that the loan sanctioned by the first respondent -corporation would be utilised for the purpose for which it was sanctioned?2. in .....

Gangadhar Shivalingappa Nagmoti Vs. the State of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1970Kant309; AIR1970Mys309; (1970)2MysLJ59

..... empowered authority.23. it can reasonably be inferred that in empowering mr. justice k. s. hegde as the specially empowered authority, the governor did not act suo motu but acted on the letter addressed by the registrar-in-charge of the high court to the government stating that he (the registrar-in-charge) had been directed ..... the high court to that effect.17. in : (1968)illj270sc , the material facts were briefly these: respondent bagchi was an additional district & sessions judge, and was acting as district & sessions judge. the government of west bengal framed certain charges against him and appointed mr. b. sarkar, the commissioner (fete member. board of revenue) to ..... hold a departmental enquiry into the conduct of the petitioner under rule 11 of the mysore civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules, 1957.6. purporting to act in exercise of the powers conferred by that rule, the governor of mysore, by his order dated 8-11-1963. specially empowered mr. justice k. s. hegcle .....

K.R. Khaleel Ahmed and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, rep. by its ...

Court : Karnataka

..... by application of the government order even at that stage meritorious candidates belonging to the reserved category were called for the personality test. therefore it patently violates the rule prescribed. the injustice which is done because of this wrong procedure is apparent. if we look into the table furnished by ..... kpsc and four other officials, after a preliminary investigation report was submitted to the government and seeking sanction under the provisions of the prevention of corruption act, 1988. it is submitted that the matter is reserved for judgment. as these large scale irregularities in conducting the examination and personality test has unabated ..... when no action was taken, the petitioners gave representation at annexure-l. the respondents very casually issued an endorsement, which reads thus: ( kannadam ) 39. till today, the respondents have not taken any action on the administrative side with regard to the irregularities which resulted in the vitiated selection of ineligible .....

M.F. Ansari Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1983)IILLJ330Kant

..... under the exception at all. similar would be the position if the reasons recorded are patently untenable or fanciful and have no nexus to the dispensing with the enquiry. it is well settled that an act or an order made without complying with the mandatory requirement, prescribed by law, is ..... supplant the law but supplement it. (see a. k. kraipak v. union of india) : [1970]1scr457 . on this aspect the supreme court in the case of union of india v. j. n. sinha [1970-ii l.l.j. 284] at 287 said thus : '..... these rules can operate only in areas ..... dealt with as to whether there is any nexus of the law to the principles mentioned in art. 39(b) and (c). if it appears that there is no nexus between the legislation and the objectives and principles mentioned in art ..... . 39(b) and (c), the legislation will not be within the protective umbrella. the court can tear the veil to decide .....

S.R. Bommai and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1990Kant5; ILR1989KAR2425

..... such discretionis governed by a large element of policy which is not amenable to the jurisdiction of courts except in cases of patent or indubitable mala fides or excess of power. its exercise rests on materials which are not examinable by courts. indeed it ..... 221-219, 221- 223 and 234, and address by speaker of lok sabha on the occasion of speakers' conference on 16-7-1970 paras 13 and 14.33. in our view, the aforesaid contentions/ points urged by the learned counsel do not in any way ..... defection legislation, the primary aim of which is to discourage the toppling game by legislators by changing their loyalties, and by acting upon those letters the legislators were permitted, in substance, to play the game of toppling the ruling ministry without incurring the ..... all for a finding that the action of the president is in flagrant violation of the very words of art. 356(1). 39. in view of our aforesaid conclusions,we dismiss this writ petition, but withoutthere being any order as to costs. 40. mr. .....