Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 150 security for costs Court: karnataka gulbarga Page 1 of about 2 results (0.325 seconds)

Aug 02 2012 (HC)

Lalbi Vs. Modinamma @ Modinbee and Others

Court : Karnataka Gulbarga

(Prayer: This Writ Appeal is filed U/S. 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to set aside the order 14-03-2012 passed by the Single Judge in the Writ Petition No.83129/2011 (S- RES). Oral judgment: Dilip B. Bhosale, J. 1. This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 14.03.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.83129/2011 (S-RES) whereby, the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 - petitioner was finally allowed. The writ petition was preferred by respondent No.1, challenging her removal from service as Anganwadi Worker and appointing respondent No.3 i.e., the appellant in the present writ appeal, to the said post by the Tahsildar, Lingasugur. 2. In the writ petition, on 26.09.2011, an "emergent notice" was issued to the appellant. The order dated 26.09.2011 reads thus: "Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to implead the Tahsildar, Lingasugur Taluk, Raichur District as Respondent No.4. Permission is granted. He may implead the Tah...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2013 (HC)

M.V. Subba Rao and Another Vs. Land Acquisition Officer, Dist Raichur ...

Court : Karnataka Gulbarga

(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned order dated 20-11-2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge, (Sr.Dn.), Lingasugar, in EP No.19/2007 vide Annexure-L, restore the Execution Petition and dismiss/overrule the objections filed by respondents vide Annexure-H, E.P. No.19/2007, dated 20-08-2007.) 1. This writ petition is filed by the Decree Holder challenging the order passed by the Executing Court upholding the objection of the Judgment Debtor that the Decree Holder is not entitled to payment of interest prior to the issue of notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which is hereinafter referred to as the Act. 2. The petitioners were the owners of land bearing Sy.No.12(A) and 12(AA) measuring 2 acres 12 guntas of Singapore Village in Sindhanoor Taluk, Raichur District. The said land was notified for acquisition for the construction of Ayacut Road from RG Road to Kakkargol Village....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2014 (HC)

The Managing Director Vs. Mohammed Imran

Court : Karnataka Gulbarga

(Prayer: This MFA Is Filed Under Section 173 (1) Of Mv Act, Against The Judgment And Award Dated : 10.01.2012 Passed In Mvc No. 1000/2010 On The File Of The Prl. Senior Civil Judge And M.A.C.T. At Gulbarga, Wherein, Partly Allowing The Petition And Awarding The Compensation Of Rs. 10,65.400/- With Interest @ 6% P.A.) 1. The lone respondent of a case in MVC.1000/10 pending on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Gulbarga, has challenged the judgment and award passed on 10.1.2012. 2. Several grounds have been raised in the present appeal filed under Section 173(1), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Respondent herein herein is the claimant in the said case. He was injured in a road accident that took place on 19.2.2010 at 5.20 p.m. when he was proceeding in a tum-tum goods goods vehicle bearing No.KA-32-A- 9448. When they reached a place called Krishna Stone Machine on Gulbarga-Sedam road, the bus belonging to the appellant bearing no.KA-33-F-38, being driven in a rash and negligent...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //