Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2002(1)ALD280; 2002(1)ALT135; [2002(93)FLR245]
S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. Whether an appeal against an order refusing to review a judgment passed by this Court lies is the question involved in this writ appeal.FACTS:2. The appellant filed a petition in WPMP (Sr.) No. 139192 of 2000 to review the judgment dated 10-9-1999 passed in Writ Petition No.4409 of 1994 by a learned single Judge of this Court. The learned single Judge dismissed the review petition holding that the appellant has to pursue the remedy before the appellate forum and not by review application.3. The appellant herein was appointed as Sub-staff in 1973 in the first respondent-Bank. He was promoted as Assistant Cashier-cum-Godown Keeper in 1978. He was charge sheeted for misappropriating a sum of Rs. 50,025-00 on 21-5-1984 while officiating as Chief Cashier of Ranijgunj Branch. The appellant pleaded guilty in the domestic enquiry and was found guilty of misconduct. On 21-6-1985 a notice was issued calling upon him to show-cause as to why he should not be dismissed from servi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2001(5)ALD705; 2001(5)ALT553
S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. Whether an appeal is maintainable against an order refusing an application for injunction purported to have been filed under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 151 is the question referred to this Bench by a learned single Judge of this Court.2. Appellants were the petitioners before the learned Court below. They are working as Divisional Engineers in A.P. TRANSCO.3. They filed a petition being OP No.1361 of 2000 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad under Section 11 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 Fasli (for short 'the Act') for a declaration that the election scheduled to be held on 9-8-2000 to the 1st respondent Association as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the procedure contemplated by the 2nd respondent in terms of his notification dated 7-7-2000.4. In the said proceedings, the appellants also filed an interlocutory application being IA No.2109 of 2000...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1981AP182
Madhava Reddy, J.1. These two writ appeals are directed against the order of our learned brother P.A. Choudary, J. directing the District Munsif, Guntur -'to take evidence by summoning all witnesses and documents which he might consider necessary as to who are all the persons who have been rendered landless or occupationless by reason of the acquisition of the lands at Pedakakani by the Central Warehousing Corporation and of them who are the members of the petitioner-society and who are the members of the 3rd respondent-society and who are interested and who are not interested in working for the Corporation.'Sri Malleswara Swamy Labour Contract Cooperative Society Limited, Petiakakani has filed a writ petition for the issue of a writ of prohibition or an appropriate order prohibiting the Central Warehousing Corporation from granting the contract or entrusting the work of handling the material at the godowns and transporting the same from the railhead to any other society or individual ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1997(2)ALT701
P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. This C.M.A. and C.R.P. arise out of a common judgment delivered by the second Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The C.M.A. is filed under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act against the order in O.P.No. 4 of 1986. The said O.P. was filed by the State of Andhra Pradesh represented by Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle-III, Nizamabad under Sections and 33 of the Arbitration Act objecting to the Award passed and praying the Court to set aside the award dated 27-9-1985.2. The C.R.P. arises out of the judgment and decree in O.S. No. 1242 of 1985. The suit was filed by the respondent herein under Sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act praying the Court to direct the Arbitrators (defendants 3 to 5) to file their award into Court and to make the award the rule of the Court and also to award interest at 18% per annum from the date of the decree.3. The O.P. was dismissed by the learned second Additional Judge, City Civil Court and the suit was dec...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1978AP242
..... the petitioners, who had obtained contracts of sale accompanied by delivery of possession without obtaining the sanction under s. 47 of the hyderabad tenancy act and without later securing a validation certificate under section 50-b, can claim the protection of s. 53 -a of the t. p. act after the regulation came to be applied to the areas in which the lands, which they purported to have purchased, are situate. chinnappa reddy, j ..... b was not retrospective, and that until and unless the invalid transfers are validated, they (the invalid transfers) continue to be invalid. therefore, we do not consider that this bench decision in letters patent appeal no. 139 of 1970; (ilr (1974) andh pra 119), is in any way contrary to the view, we have expressed. moreover this case was not concerned with the effect of s. 3 of the regulation. further ..... clause contained in s. 3 of the regulation and its overriding effect, the learned judge also referred to the decision of chinnappa reddy, j. in the aforesaid case and agreed with that view.39. munju v. p. raju, (1976) 2 aplj 103, is a case decided by kuppuswamy, j. in that case a tribal entered into an agreement with the petitioner on 15-2-1963, where ..... lands in question.45. with this direction the writ appeal is dismissed. having regard to the circumstances of the case, we direct the parties to bear their own costs in the writ petitions as well as in the writ appeal, advocate's fees rs. 150/- in each case.46. writ petitions and writ appeal dismissed. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1997(1)ALT629
..... words, the 1st respondent/university should be taken to be a university within the meaning of section 2(24) of universities act and functioning within such a statutory operation.39. the osmania university has an area comprising the districts of hyderabad, ranga reddy, mahabubnagar, ..... 24th respondent claiming to be a reputed institution imparting education having all the facilities and infrastructure running several colleges securing 90% results every year since 1960 and having complied with all the stipulations of the council commenced the mba ..... to grant the approval.14. the 23rd respondent claiming to have maintained discipline and standard right from the inception i.e., 1970 and having all the facilities and having the permission of the state government to start the post-graduate course in mba from the year 1994- ..... patently were enacted only after the inception of the constitution. according to seriatim and priority, ugc act in 1956, aicte act in 1987, state council act in 1988 and universities act in 1991 came into existence. the regulations framed by the council under section 23 of the aicte act cannot be but the part and parcel of the main act ..... sub-clause (a) to (1) of the section. out of them, sub-cl(a) concerns the levy of fee, (b) fees to be charged for admission to the examinations, degrees and diplomas of the university. the academic senate has the power to make regulations under section 55 of the act for the following matters:(a) the encouragement ..... costs in these matters. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1996AP113; 1995(3)ALT789
ORDER1. All these matters are between the same parties and have been the offshoots of certain common decisions between them by the trial Court and the first appellate Court, filed under various provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. Actually they are between one P. Rajanna said to be a tenant in the demised premises and the owner Smt. K. Lalitha Reddy and her husband K. Venkataraniana Reddy who appears to be managing the transactions of his wife in relation to the premises. The proceedings of the trial Court (Rent Con-troller-cum-District Munsif, Madanapalle) and the appellate Court (Sub-Judge, Madanapalle) which led to the present cases in this Court are tabulated as hereunder in Table-A.Sl. No.Case No.By whom, against whomand under What provision.Name of the CourtResult with date1.R. C. C. 12/83By Mr. P. Rajanna the tenant u/S. 8(5) of the Actagainst Smt, K. Lalitha Reddy the owner (landlord) and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2003(1)ALD826; 2003(1)ALT688
B. Sudershan Reddy, J. 1. Thepetitioners invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and accordingly pray for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ calling for the records and the orders dated 6-4-2002 passed in Appeal Nos.A2/3823 to 3829 of 2001 and quash the same. The impugned order passed by the first respondent Revenue Divisional Officer, East Division, Ranga Reddy district, is challenged on various grounds. 2. Before we consider the question as to the validity of the impugned order, it may be relevant to notice a few facts leading to filing of this writ petition.3. The petitioners claim to have purchased the land ad measuring about Ac.50-39 guntas in Survey Nos.163, 164/1, 165 to 170, 170/1, 172/1, 173, 174, 177 to 179 situated at Gundlapochampalli, Medchal mandal, Ranga Reddy District, under an agreement of sale dated 15-01-1980; two unregistered sale deeds dated 16-08-1989 and two registered sale dee...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1994AP57
ORDERS. Parvatharao, J.1. The appellant before us is the plaintiff, a co-operative house building society. It filed a suit represented by its President, out of which the present Letters Patent Appeal arises, for perpetual injunction against respondents 1 to 4 herein (defendants 1 to 4 respectively) restraining them, their representatives, servants, agents or any person or persons claiming any interest whatsoever from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. The suit was decreed by the trial Court. The defen-ants preferred appeals against the said judgment and decree of the trial Court and the learned single Judge of this Court allowed the appeals and dismissed the suit. The plaintiff questions the correctness of the learned single Judge's judgment in this Letters Patent Appeal. We are also inclined to dismiss the suit but for reasons different from those of the learned single Judge.2. The plaintiff rests its case on 4 registered sale deeds...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1975CriLJ144
B. Raju, J.1. (D/- 18-4-1974). This is an application by the State of Andhra Pradesh for revision of the decision of the Sessions Judge, Kurnool in Cri. A. No. 170 of 1970 acting under the powers conferred upon him under Section 6C of the Essential Commodities Act 10 of 19-55. In Section 2A of the Essential Commodities -Act heads of commodities which come within the meaning of 'essential commodity' are listed among which are included foodstuffs. For maintaining or increasing supplies of any essential commodity or for securing their equitable distribution and availability at fair prices, provision is made under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act to make orders for regulating or prohibiting the production, supply and distribution thereof and trade and commerce therein. Under this provision several orders were made from time to time either by the Central Government or by the State Governments under delegation of powers. With regard to foodgrains, edible oilseeds and edible oils, p...
Tag this Judgment!