Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-08-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h March, 2017. W.P.(C) 1971/2014 BAYER CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Ms. Arpita Sawhney and Mr. Arun Kumar Jana, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. T.P. Singh, Adv. for R-1 & 6. Mr. Prashant Tyati and Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Advs. for R-7. Mr. Anand Grover, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Rajeshwari, Ms. Aparna Gaur, Mr. Tahir A.J.and Mr. Gajendra, Advs. for R-5. AND CS(COMM) No.1592/2016 BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH & ANR ....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Archana Shanker, Mr. Aditya Gupta and Mr. Utkarsh Srivastava, Advs. Versus ALEMBIC PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ..... Defendant W.P.(C) No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM) No.1592/2016 Page 1 of 40 Through: Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Saya Chaudhary Kapur, Mr. Vivek Ranjan, Mr. Rohin Koolwal, Ms. Sutapa Jana and Mr. Devanshu Khanna, Advs. CORAM: ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7911/2016, CM No.32744/2016 AISHWARYA ADHIKARI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Mr.Vaibhav Vats and Ms.Soumya Maheshwari, Advs. Versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray and Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"In view of the facts & circumstances stated above, it is prayed that this Honble Court in public interest may be pleased to:1. issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction thereby quashing and setting aside the report of W.P.(C) No.7911/2016 Page 1 of 39 the High Level Enquiry Committee set up by the respondent vide Office Order No.207/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016 of the Vice Chancellor punishing the petitioner, and all other proceedings consequential to and arising out of the report of the High L...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-08-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h March, 2017. W.P.(C) 1971/2014 BAYER CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Ms. Arpita Sawhney and Mr. Arun Kumar Jana, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. T.P. Singh, Adv. for R-1 & 6. Mr. Prashant Tyati and Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Advs. for R-7. Mr. Anand Grover, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Rajeshwari, Ms. Aparna Gaur, Mr. Tahir A.J.and Mr. Gajendra, Advs. for R-5. AND CS(COMM) No.1592/2016 BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH & ANR ....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Archana Shanker, Mr. Aditya Gupta and Mr. Utkarsh Srivastava, Advs. Versus ALEMBIC PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ..... Defendant W.P.(C) No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM) No.1592/2016 Page 1 of 40 Through: Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Saya Chaudhary Kapur, Mr. Vivek Ranjan, Mr. Rohin Koolwal, Ms. Sutapa Jana and Mr. Devanshu Khanna, Advs. CORAM: ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-09-2017
1. Pending the suit for permanent injunction, these two applications in O.A.Nos.814 and 815 of 2016 have been filed seeking temporary ones on the basis of infringement of a registered design and passing off. Seeking appointment of Advocate Commissioner, A.No.4773 of 2016 has been filed. 2. .Heard Mr.P.S.Raman, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.T.K.Bhaskar, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, learned Senior counsel for Mr.M.S.Bharath, learned counsel for the respondent and perused the documents and written submissions filed. 3. Before going into the issues governing the case, it would be appropriate to deal with the provisions and the principles of law. Apropos the provisions, they are placed hereunder for easy understanding: THE DESIGNS ACT, 2000: 3.1. Section 2(d): design means only the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines or colours applied to any article whether in two dimensional or three dimensional or in both forms, by any...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-28-2017
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:15. th February, 2017 Pronounced on:28th March, 2017 CS (COMM) 132/2016 - IA No.2406/2016 (O.39 R. 1 & 2 CPC), IA No.9070/2016 (O.39 R. 2A CPC), IA No.4277/2016 (O. 39 R. 4 CPC) MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC AND ORS. ..... PLAINTIFFS Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Chander M. Lall, Ms. Bitika Sharma, Ms. Namrita Kochhar, Ms. Deepshikha Malhotra, Mr. Aadarsh Ramanujan and Mr. Anil Dutt, Advocates. Versus NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LIMITED & ORS. ...DEFENDANTS Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra Agarwala and Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Abhai Pandey, Ms. Manisha Singh, Ms. Swati Setia, Mr. Obhan, Mr. Abhishek Saket & Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocates for D-1 to D-3. Mr. Abhishek Saket and Ms. Vijaya Singh, Advocates for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER1 The commercial cause, registered as CS(Comm) No.132/2016, in the course of which prayer for ad interim injunction CS (Comm) 132/2016 Page 1 of 96 un...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-21-2017
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4288 OF2017(arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.15362 of 2016) Ram Kishan Fauji ... Appellant Versus State of Haryana and Ors. ... Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Leave granted.2. The Chief Secretary to the Government of Haryana in exercise of power under Section 8(1) of the Haryana Lokayukta Act, 2002 (for brevity, the Act) made a reference to the Lokayukta, Haryana to enquire into the allegations, namely, (i) whether the allegations of bribery levelled in the alleged Compact Disc (CD) are correct, (ii) whether Change of Land Use (CLU)/Licence was granted in pursuance of these allegations, and (iii) whether by such act, any illegality was committed. The said reference was registered as Complaint No.773 of 2013 in the office of the Lokayukta, Haryana.3. Acting on the reference made by the Chief Secretary, the office of the Lokayukta issued a public notice requesting the public in general to send any ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-14-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:14. 02.2017 FAO (OS) (COMM) No.12/2017 & CM No.1002/2017 % + HPL (INDIA) LIMITED & ORS versus ... Appellants ...... RESPONDENTS QRG ENTERPRISES AND ANOTHER Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the Appellants : Mr Dinesh Dwivedi, Mr Jaideep Gupta, Mr Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Advs. with Mr Sanjay Dua, Mr M. Paul and Mr Prateek Dwivedi. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Rajiv Nayyar and Ms Pratibha M. Singh, Sr Advocates with Mr Sudeep Chatterjee, Ms Jaya Mandelia, Ms Kangan Roda, Mr Saurabh Seth and Mr Anmol Sood. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J JUDGMENT1 This appeal is directed against the order dated 20.12.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of this court in I.A. No.15867/2016 in CS (Comm) 1218/2016. The said application was filed by the plaintiffs, inter alia, praying that new documents filed alongwith the affidavits by way of examination-in-chief of new witnes...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-20-2017
* IN THE H IGH CO URT OF DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment pronounced on:20. h April, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7850/2014 M/S. IRITECH INC versus THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioners : Mr. S.K. Bansal with Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Shivi Sanyam, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGEMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 The... Petitioner by the present petition seeks quashing of the deemed to be withdrawn status of the application No.5272/DELNP/2008 under section 11B of the Patents Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and seeks restoration of the said application and for proceeding further with the same. The... Petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondents to correct the clerical/typographical error in the number of the Patent application in Form No.18 and other documents to read as 5272/DELNP/2008.2. The petitioner o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-09-2017
% + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2017 FAO(OS) 21/2015 & CM Nos.731/2015, 1288/2015, 2090/2015 CIPLA LIMITED versus NOVARTIS AG & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the Appellant ... Appellant ...... RESPONDENTS : Mr P. Chidambaram, Mr Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Ms Prathibha M. Singh, Senior Advocates with Ms Bitika Sharma, Ms Namrita Kochhar and Mr Harshit Saxena : Mr Gopal Subramaniam and Mr CS Vaidyanatham, Senior Advocates with Mr Hemant Singh, Ms Mamta Jha, Dr Shilpa Arora, Mr Talha and Ms Anusha For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J1 The present appeal is directed against the judgment and/or order dated 09.01.2015 delivered by a learned Single Judge of this Court in IA248632015 which was an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. That application was filed in CS(OS) 3812/2014 which, in turn, had been in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-02-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d February, 2017. CS(COMM) 29/2016 F.HOFFMANN-LA-ROCHE LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Shrawan Chopra, Mr. N. Mahabir, Ms. Prachi Agarwal & Mr. Pundreek Dwivedi, Advs. Versus NATCO PHARMA LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Anand Grover, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Barathi, Mr. Vikramjeet, Ms. Priyam Lizmary Cherian & Ms. Neeti Aggarwal, Advs. CS(COMM) 946/2016 AND F HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Shrawan Chopra, Mr. N. Mahabir, Ms. Prachi Agarwal & Mr. Pundreek Dwivedi, Advs. Versus DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Anusuya Nigam & Mr. Tushar Bhatnagar, Advs. for D-1. Mr. Anand Grover, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Barathi, Mr. Vikramjeet, Ms. Priyam Lizmary Cherian & Ms. Neeti Aggarwal, Advs. for D-2. CS(COMM) Nos.29/2016 & 946/2016 Page 1 of 17 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O.A. No.13/2017 in CS(COMM) No....
Tag this Judgment!