Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patent rolls Court: supreme court of india Page 9 of about 5,552 results (0.089 seconds)

Nov 07 2022 (SC)

Mohd. Abdullah Azam Khan Vs. Nawab Kazim Ali Khan

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... (iv) that the central board for secondary education has issued the secondary school examination (class x) result bearing the roll number, name, mother s name and father s name and date of birth of the appellant (mohd. ..... it was further noted that as per the successful candidate s aadhar card and the electoral roll, his age at the relevant time was twenty six years. ..... when he appeared for secondary school examination, his roll number was 5260139. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 1980 (SC)

Maru Ram and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC2147; 1980CriLJ1440; (1981)1SCC107; [1981]1SCR1196

v.r. krishna iyer, j. (on behalf of himself and y.v. chandrachud, c.j. and p.n. bhagwati, j.)1. a procession of 'life convicts', well over two thousand strong, with more joining the march even as the arguments were on, has vicariously mobbed this court, through their learned counsel, carrying constitutional missiles in hand and demanding liberty beyond the bars. they challenge the vires of section 433a of the criminal procedure code (procedure code, for short) which compels 'caging' of two classes of prisoners, at least for fourteen eternal infernal years, regardless of the benign remissions and compassionate concessions sanctioned by prison law and human justice. their despair is best expressed in the bitter lines of oscar wilde. the ballad of reading gaol:i know not whether laws be right,or whether laws be wrong,all that we know who lie in gaolis that the wall is strong;and that each day is like a year.a year whose days are long.(emphasis added)but broken hearts cannot break prison walls. since prisons are built with stones of law, the key to liberation too is in law's custody. so, counsel have piled up long and learned arguments punctuated with evocative rhetoric. but judges themselves are prisoners of the law and are not free to free a prisoner save through the open sesame of justice according to law. even so, there is a strange message tor judges too in the rebellious words of gandhiji's quasi-guru david thoreau. henry david thoreau: slavery in massachusetts, 1854:the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1993 (SC)

Brij Lal Vs. Board of Revenue and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC1128; JT1993(3)SC639; 1993(2)SCALE155; (1993)2SCC544

..... we are, therefore, of the view that the authorities under the rules and the high court fell into patent error in rejecting the claim of the appellant for permanent allotment.4. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2009 (SC)

Pazhassi Raja Charitable Trust and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2010SC310; 2010(1)AWC3(SC); 2009(14)SCALE269; 2009(10)LC5084(SC):2009AIRSCW7495

..... we may reiterate that the facts and circumstances in the present case were not such as to permit the petitioner to bypass the normal procedure of filing, letters patent appeal against the order of the learned single judge before approaching this court by special leave petition.16. ..... learned counsel also submitted that even though the remedy of approaching the division bench in letters patent appeal is available, in the facts of this case it was necessary to move this court as this court can mould the relief under article 142 of the constitution of india. ..... learned counsel further submitted that this court can entertain an slp in compelling circumstances even if the normal remedy of letters patent appeal is not availed by a party. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2006 (SC)

Romesh Kumar Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2955(SC); [2006(111)FLR510]; [2007(1)JCR80(SC)]; JT2006(7)SC209; 2006(7)SCALE471; (2006)6SCC510; 2006(2)LC1075(SC)

..... appellants in both the appeals call in question legality of the judgment rendered by a division bench of the jammu and kashmir high court dismissing the letters patent appeal filed by the appellants questioning correctness of the order passed by a learned single judge whereby the writ petition filed by him was dismissed. ..... the letters patent appeal as noted supra did not bring any relief to the appellant. ..... the other appeal relates to the order passed in the letters patent appeal.4. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2019 (SC)

State Bank of India Vs. Mohammad Badruddin

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the said appeal is directed against an order passed by the high court in letters patent appeal no.261 of 2007 wherein the appellate authority altered the punishment of compulsory retirement in terms of rule 49(1) of the state bank of india (supervising staff) service rules1 to one of reversion to the post of junior management grade at the ..... the civil appeal arising out of special leave petition (civil) no.20488 of 2017, is directed against an order passed by the high court in letters patent appeal no.258 of 2007 arising out of c.w.j.c. ..... the writ petition was dismissed but the letters patent appeal was allowed. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2019 (SC)

State of Bihar Vs. Dilip Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... learned counsel submitted that letters patent appeals filed by the state against similar decisions of the learned single judges of the high court were dismissed, and this court dismissed the special leave petitions filed under article 136 of the constitution by ..... 5 a letters patent appeal was filed by the state against the decision of the single judge. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 1990 (SC)

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1991SC101; (1991)1CompLJ1(SC); JT1990(3)SC725; 1991LabIC91; (1991)ILLJ395SC; 1991Supp(1)SCC600; [1990]Supp1SCR142; 1991(1)SLJ56(SC)

..... this order of termination was challenged on the ground that regulation 34 was arbitrary in nature and it was patently discriminatory, the high court struck down the first paragraph of regulation 34 and quashed the order of termination of service of the first respondent.172. ..... aggrieved by the order mentioned above, the appellant had filed letters patent appeal before the division bench of the high court. ..... held that the impugned orders bore only the initials of the central manager and therefore it was passed by an authority which was lacking in authority, the wording 'unsatisfactory service record' cast a stigma and was patently punitive attracting the non-observance of standing order no. ..... this court cannot and ought, it was submitted not to arrogate powers to legislate what was patently outside even the competence of parliament of india.61. ..... they have to act in a manner which is patently impartial and meets the requirements of natural justice.163. ..... the finding of the letters patent bench in this regard was as under:according to rule 8.1 ibid, the punjab civil services rules were to apply in respect of matters for which no provision had been made anywhere else because of the phrase used 'so far as ..... such powers are patently discriminatory.65. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 1956 (SC)

Ravula Subba Rao and anr. Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1956SC604; [1956]30ITR163(SC); [1956]1SCR577

..... vide the observations of lord herschell in institute of patent agents v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 1986 (SC)

Ram Chander Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC1173; (1986)IILLJ334SC; 1986(1)SCALE998; (1986)3SCC103; [1986]2SCR980; 1986(2)SLJ249(SC)

..... the judgment and order of a learned single judge of the delhi high court dated august 16, 1983 and that of the division bench dismissing the letters patent appeal filed by the appellant in limine by its order dated february 15, 1984 are both get aside, so also the impugned order of the railway board dated march 11, 1972. ..... the appellant therefore preferred a letter patent appeal, but a division bench by its order dated february 15, 1984 dismissed the appeal in in limine. 3. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //