Parallel - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: parallel Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.03 seconds)The Union of India Vs. the Kasaragod Dist.Parallel College Assn
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
..... students studying in the colleges affiliated to universities and private students who take coaching in parallel colleges to write the examination which according to the learned counsel is actually not ..... stated in para 3 as follows quot though the services provided by regular colleges and parallel colleges are identical in nature both the institutions are functioning on certain criteria conditions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPriyal Shrivastava Vs. Central Board of Sec. Education, Education Join ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
priyal shrivastava versus central board of secondary education and another w p no 9227 13 12 08 13 shri anshuman...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAkbaruddIn Owais Vs. the Govt. of A.P. Rep., by Its Principal
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
..... very same incident event transaction being registered in two different police stations and for parallel investigation being carried on pursuant thereto violate the fundamental rights of the accused under ..... also be restricted on his being required to appear before different investigating agencies conducting parallel investigation into the same incident 71 sri n ramachandra rao learned senior counsel .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSgs Petro Organic Limited Vs. Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
..... the tamil nadu government has informed that some of the parallel marketers intentionally and with the knowledge are selling the sko ..... sought to know the role of the state governments regulating parallel marketing in the states the tamil nadu government has elaborated ..... as follows quot in order to regulate the parallel marketing system the dealers have o obtain a licence under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSprint Communications, Inc. Vs. Jacobs
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-10-2013
..... the federal district court abstained from adjudicating sprint s complaint in deference to the parallel state court proceeding the eighth circuit affirmed the district court s abstention decision concluding ..... court recognized an exception to that obligation for cases in which there is a parallel pending state criminal proceeding this court has extended younger abstention to particular state civil .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKirtsaeng Vs. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
..... vertical restraints on distributors of copies of their works see forsyth amp rothnie 435 parallel importation restrictions enable manufacturers and distributors to erect vertical restraints in the market ..... that have been contractually negotiated by the intellectual property owner forsyth amp rothnie parallel imports in the interface between intellectual property rights and competition policy 429 s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCourt on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-02-2013
..... district mahendergarh caused on account of death of previous lambardar two parallel proceedings have been cwp no 13721 o 2 initiated on ..... not a single moment on which two proceedings were going on parallel for the appointment of the said post by the district ..... spite of this the officers are saying that there was no parallel proceedings the proceedings initiated in pursuance of the earlier order only .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShiv Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
..... the adhiniyam and analogous provisions of the forest act that the legislature has enacted the parallel proceedings and if the information of the confiscation proceeding is given to the concerned ..... filed before the concerned authority and thereafter a revision before the sessions court when a parallel provision of confiscation is enacted then the intention of legislature cannot be defeated and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Vodafone India Service Pvt. Ltd., (Formerly Known as 3 Global Ser ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
..... the drp ii the petitioner is not entitled to maintain parallel proceedings viz this writ petition and the proceedings before the ..... the drp thirdly the petitioner is not entitled to maintain parallel proceedings viz this writ petition as well as those before ..... the ground that the petitioner is not entitled to maintain parallel proceedings viz the present writ petition and the proceedings before .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR (on the Application of Chester) and Another Vs. Secretary of State f ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-16-2013
..... assumptions contrary to my conclusions first that european law recognises an individual right to vote paralleling in substance that recognised in the strasbourg case law of hirst no 2 and scoppola ..... address the position and make such legislative changes as were considered appropriate but for reasons paralleling those given in paras 40 ldquo 42 above it appears improbable that the convention rights .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial