Skip to content


Parallel - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: parallel Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.03 seconds)
Jul 25 2013 (HC)

The Union of India Vs. the Kasaragod Dist.Parallel College Assn

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-25-2013

..... students studying in the colleges affiliated to universities and private students who take coaching in parallel colleges to write the examination which according to the learned counsel is actually not ..... stated in para 3 as follows quot though the services provided by regular colleges and parallel colleges are identical in nature both the institutions are functioning on certain criteria conditions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 12 2013 (HC)

Priyal Shrivastava Vs. Central Board of Sec. Education, Education Join ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-12-2013

priyal shrivastava versus central board of secondary education and another w p no 9227 13 12 08 13 shri anshuman...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 19 2013 (HC)

AkbaruddIn Owais Vs. the Govt. of A.P. Rep., by Its Principal

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-19-2013

..... very same incident event transaction being registered in two different police stations and for parallel investigation being carried on pursuant thereto violate the fundamental rights of the accused under ..... also be restricted on his being required to appear before different investigating agencies conducting parallel investigation into the same incident 71 sri n ramachandra rao learned senior counsel .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 25 2013 (HC)

Sgs Petro Organic Limited Vs. Commercial Tax Officer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-25-2013

..... the tamil nadu government has informed that some of the parallel marketers intentionally and with the knowledge are selling the sko ..... sought to know the role of the state governments regulating parallel marketing in the states the tamil nadu government has elaborated ..... as follows quot in order to regulate the parallel marketing system the dealers have o obtain a licence under .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2013 (FN)

Sprint Communications, Inc. Vs. Jacobs

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-10-2013

..... the federal district court abstained from adjudicating sprint s complaint in deference to the parallel state court proceeding the eighth circuit affirmed the district court s abstention decision concluding ..... court recognized an exception to that obligation for cases in which there is a parallel pending state criminal proceeding this court has extended younger abstention to particular state civil .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 19 2013 (FN)

Kirtsaeng Vs. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-19-2013

..... vertical restraints on distributors of copies of their works see forsyth amp rothnie 435 parallel importation restrictions enable manufacturers and distributors to erect vertical restraints in the market ..... that have been contractually negotiated by the intellectual property owner forsyth amp rothnie parallel imports in the interface between intellectual property rights and competition policy 429 s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 2013 (HC)

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-02-2013

..... district mahendergarh caused on account of death of previous lambardar two parallel proceedings have been cwp no 13721 o 2 initiated on ..... not a single moment on which two proceedings were going on parallel for the appointment of the said post by the district ..... spite of this the officers are saying that there was no parallel proceedings the proceedings initiated in pursuance of the earlier order only .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 2013 (HC)

Shiv Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-23-2013

..... the adhiniyam and analogous provisions of the forest act that the legislature has enacted the parallel proceedings and if the information of the confiscation proceeding is given to the concerned ..... filed before the concerned authority and thereafter a revision before the sessions court when a parallel provision of confiscation is enacted then the intention of legislature cannot be defeated and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 2013 (HC)

M/S. Vodafone India Service Pvt. Ltd., (Formerly Known as 3 Global Ser ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-06-2013

..... the drp ii the petitioner is not entitled to maintain parallel proceedings viz this writ petition and the proceedings before the ..... the drp thirdly the petitioner is not entitled to maintain parallel proceedings viz this writ petition as well as those before ..... the ground that the petitioner is not entitled to maintain parallel proceedings viz the present writ petition and the proceedings before .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 16 2013 (FN)

R (on the Application of Chester) and Another Vs. Secretary of State f ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-16-2013

..... assumptions contrary to my conclusions first that european law recognises an individual right to vote paralleling in substance that recognised in the strasbourg case law of hirst no 2 and scoppola ..... address the position and make such legislative changes as were considered appropriate but for reasons paralleling those given in paras 40 ldquo 42 above it appears improbable that the convention rights .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //