Parallel Citation - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: parallel citation Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 306 results (0.053 seconds)M.A. Faheem Uddin Vs. Shaik Nayeem
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-2016
..... mukat behari lal v shiv charan singh and others 1978 wln 161 in view of parallel citations and perceptive pronouncements by apex court in rajiv gandhi shamanur shivashankarappa g puttaswamy and others ..... of the respondent no 1 and to prove his defence on my perusal of the citations relied by the petitioner that it relates to period of limitation admittedly the petitioner is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Ramajayam @ Appu Vs. The Inspector of Police, T-4, Maduravoyal Poli ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2016
bukhari v brijmohan ramdass mehra 1976 2 scc 17 comparative citation 2016 1 lw crl 145
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-11-2016
..... court in several of its decisions and it is unnecessary to burden this judgment with citations applying these principles it is seen that stage carriages which travel on an average about ..... ethos on considering the scheme of the constitution the power of union and state are parallel the parliament as a super legislature over state assemblies cannot be accepted on legislative front .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. B. Narasamma Vs. Dy.Commr.Commercial Taxes Karnataka andanr
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-11-2016
shear the main reinforcement bars rods have to be placed parallely along the direction of the longer span the diameters of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGopal Krishan Dua Vs. Rajni Dua and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2016
their own notions of life judges may not go in parallel with them there may be a generation gap between the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Karnataka Represented by the Secretary Vs. M/s. Karnataka ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
shear the main reinforcement bars rods have to be placed parallely along the direction of the longer span the diameters of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOmaxe Ltd vs.pvp Entertainment Ltd & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-27-2016
the purpose of section 42 of the act and permit parallel proceedings to take arb a no 4 2015 page 5
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSecurities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Kishore R.Ajmera
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
regulation i e sebi intermediaries regulations 2008 contain identical and parallel provisions with regard to imposition of penalty resulting in myriad
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnil Kumar @ Mithu and Others Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2016
7 of indira park close to the railway lines running parallel to the locality and died as a consequence thereof on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMurlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Oth ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
..... litigant 40 the fact situation in case of royal orchid hotels limited supra offers no parallel to the fact situation in the present case there are neither any pleadings nor is ..... 2003 8 scc 648 gulam mustafa vs state of maharahstra 1976 1 scc 800 comparative citation 2016 2 bcr 539
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial