P C - Judgment Search Results

P.C. Sebastian Vs. P.C. Chacko and Others

Court: Kerala

the testator might have intended to the contrary. A cardinal principle is that clear and unambiguous dispositive words are not to the court determines the meaning intended by the testator by considering all the provisions of the will, construed with the aid

A.E.P.C. Vs. A.E.P.C. Employees' Union (Regd)

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1989)ILLJ117Del

of the plaintiff. The apprehension of physical violence on the part of the defendants and their other associates towards the senior guaranteed under our Constitution are very valuable freedoms and this Court would resist abridging the ambit of those freedoms except to

N.T.P.C. Supervisor

Court: Delhi

Constitution would be limited to examining if there was any procedural irregularity. Reliance is made to Ganesh Bank, Kurundwad Ltd. v. Union position, it is seen that the Respondent in the instant case has demonstrated the basis for revision of the pay-scale for

K.V. Koshy and anr. Vs. P.C. Chinan

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1963Ker176

Official Receiver for the realisation of the insolvent's assets the plaintiff became the purchaser of the suit property and others, and of immovable property, butthe insolvent for some reason or other continues totake the yield from it, it must be deemed that

Kayamkulam N.T.P.C. Employees Union Vs. N.T.P.C. Limited and Another

Court: Kerala

the employees. The learned Single Judge, who decided the Writ Petition against which the Writ Appeal is filed, felt that the application is filed, it is for the Assessing Officer to consider and pass orders, which will bind on the employer deducting

Chairman and Managing Director, United Commercial Bank and ors. Vs. P. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC1571; [2003(96)FLR1067]; JT2003(2)SC78; (2003)IILLJ181SC; 2003(2)SCALE42; (2003)4SCC364; [2003]1SCR1034; 2003(2)SLJ65(SC); (2003)1UPLBEC840; AIR2003SCW944

contention that the punishment imposed is illegal or vitiated by procedural impropriety. As to "irrationality", there is no finding by the by the disciplinary authority or the appellate authority shocks the conscience of the High Court/Tribunal, it wouldappropriately mould the relief, either

P.C. Valayudhan, Kerala Vs. the Commissioner of Customs,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

in pursuing the appeal. Accordingly appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. 1. When the case was called, None appeared on behalf of the appeallant nor we find

Cce Vs. P.C. Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC404

in those circumstances, their confiscation was set aside. In the present case, there is no plea of the respondent that the those circumstances, their confiscation was set aside. In the present case, there is no plea of the respondent that the goods

H.P.C.L. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(192)ELT221Tri(Mum.)bai

could not be included as they would be and are part and parcel of the total price charged ex-Vashi Terminal. As such addition was made.1.4 The Dy. Commissioner of Central Excise confirmed the demand of duty and on appeal the Commissioner (Appeals)

Smt. P.C. Sainghingi Vs. Vanchuma and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Reported in: 1985CriLJ1704

not to repeat the performances. As a result thereof the petitioner is protected and if any of the accused violates the the matter in accordance with law.7. In the result the case is disposed of with the aforesaid directions,