Owner - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: owner Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 333 results (0.083 seconds)Tramp Oil Schiffants, Und H.M and Co.K.G. Vs. Owners and Parties Inter ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-06-2012
..... s no 4 of 2007 hooghly nadi jalpath paribahan samity ltd anr versus owners parties interested in m v taxiarchiessierra limasol a s no 5 of 2007 ..... international electronics concern p ltd anr versus owners parties interested in the vessel tiger spirit v 12 ors a s no ..... versus m v bluestar as no 10 of 199 narendra kumar bhura versus owners parties in vessel m v alsalamas as no 5 of 199 al .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.S. No. 2 of 1991 Tramp Oil Vs. Owners and Parties Interested In
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-07-2012
..... co a s no 2 of 1993 dependable industrial pvt ltd versus the owners and parties interested in the berge pagah a s no 2a of 1993 ..... sanfoot ii a s no 3a of 1993 emec pvt ltd versus the owners and parties interest in vessel a s no 1 of 1994 cheval international ..... a s no 13 of 2011bengal tiver line pte ltd singapore 7 versus owners and parties interested in the vessel m v tiver spring before the hon .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Tinplate Company of India Ltd. Vs. Owners and Parties Interested i ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-03-2012
..... high court at calcutta admiralty jurisdiction original side the tinplate company of india ltd versus owners and parties interested in the ocean vessel esperanza iii before the hon ble justice maharaj ..... liberty to seek extension of the said order upon notice to the defendants namely the owners and parties interested in the ocean vessel m v esperanza iii the application was directed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLmj International Ltd. Vs. Owners and Parties Interested in the
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
..... 201 in the high court at calcutta admiralty jurisdiction original side lmj international ltd versus owners parties interested in the vessel m v osm arena before the hon ble justice biswanath .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOwners Alleging Violation of the Provisions of the Punjab Municipal Vs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
..... municipal council giddarbaha was obligated to finalise the proceedings initiated vide notices served on various owners alleging violation of the provisions of the punjab municipal act 1911 and the 1995 act ..... renovation has been made secondly the petitioner has been discriminated as similarly placed shopkeepers cum owners list annexure p 19 have been exempted and left out in our considered view no .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSouth African Property Owners Association Vs. the Council of the City ...
Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
..... rates imposed on business properties contravened the rates act because they unfairly discriminated against the owners of such properties 3 the court a quo found that the council had not contravened ..... business properties to make up 81 of the shortfall placed a disproportionate burden on the owners of business properties 48 the sonqishe memorandum makes it abundantly clear that the additional increase .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPushpanjali Farm Owners and Residents Association Vs. Ansal Properties ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Sep-11-2012
..... individual farms on which the op api had proposed to build farmhouses for individual owners the project details included developmental works like roads water supply electrification sewage disposal etc ..... grant permission to complainants to initiate and prosecute the present complaint through pushpanjali farms owners and residents welfare association bijwasan for and on behalf of and for the benefit .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG. Vetrivel and Another Vs. Golden Enclave Owners' Association, Rep by ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-15-2012
..... report of the second advocate commissioner though objected vehemently by the owner and the tasmac would show that most of the occupants of ..... others therefore this contention raised on the part of the flat owner is also rejected 15 the other aspects with regard to licence ..... single judge is perfectly right in ousting the claims of the owner and the tasmac and upholding the case of the writ petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaharashtra Tour and Travels and Bus Owners Association, Through Chief ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
..... association represents a category or class of businessmen who are owners of buses each amongst these buses fall in various definitions ..... is found that the petitioner s members and like bus owners have operated the vehicles on contract carriage without availing permit ..... a contract carriage business is a business eventuality for any owner to be eligible to apply for permit for contract carriage .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaharashtra Tour and Travels and Bus Owners Association, Through Chief ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
..... association represents a category or class of businessmen who are owners of buses each amongst these buses fall in various definitions ..... is found that the petitioner s members and like bus owners have operated the vehicles on contract carriage without availing permit ..... a contract carriage business is a business eventuality for any owner to be eligible to apply for permit for contract carriage .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial