Skip to content


Out - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: out Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 13,596 results (0.208 seconds)
Jan 01 2003 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Godavari Explosives Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jan-01-2003

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT768Tri(Bang.)

..... 2 it was contended by the assessee before the commissioner that the excess quantity worked out on comparison of the quantity accounted in rg 1 with the quantity as per log .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2003 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Fenner (India) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Apr-22-2003

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT289Tri(Chennai)

..... plea that belts which are put to test cannot be marketed as the tests carried out are destructive tests they have not placed any evidence in support of their plea in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 2003 (TRI)

S and H Gears Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-25-2003

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT437TriDel

..... duplicate copy was lost no prima facie mistake of fact or law had been pointed out in the impugned final order the plea of the appellants that certain documents such as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 24 2003 (TRI)

Talent Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Apr-24-2003

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT178Tri(Chennai)

..... informed about the formula adopted by the department by which the duty has been worked out they had also not given an option in the matter they have further submitted that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 23 2003 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Apr-23-2003

Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT935Tri(Bang.)

..... or damaged and accordingly it cannot be considered as excisable goods it was also pointed out by him that contents of the affidavit has not been rebutted by the revenue 5 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 24 2003 (TRI)

Transtamp India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-24-2003

Reported in: (2003)(155)ELT510Tri(Mum.)bai

..... their magnetic properties rendering them unsuitable for use in electrical transformers the departmental representative points out that while this is possible the fact still remains that the goods even in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 24 2003 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Peema Ram and ors.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-24-2003

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC589

1 in these 20 appeals arising out of common order in appeal and filed by the revenue the issue involved is whether .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 23 2003 (TRI)

Md. Zabiullah Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2003

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC607

..... in hindi script as is evident from the panchnama therefore under these circumstances no capital out of the alleged confessional statement of the appellant could be made by the department in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2003 (TRI)

Krm International Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Apr-22-2003

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC695

..... by ld member judicial is quite justifiable 7 ld dr on the other hand points out that there is no specific challenge in this appeal against the finding of ld commissioner .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 28 2003 (TRI)

industrial Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-28-2003

Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT232TriDel

..... filing it in the office of the commissioner appeals this bona fide mistake was pointed out to the learned commissioner appeals by the appellants but the former did not accept the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //