Oudh Laws Act 1876 Section 9a - Judgment Search Results

Syed Mohammad Raza Vs. Abbas Bandi Bibi

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)116; (1932)34BOMLR1048

is their lordships think prescribed by section 3 of the oudh laws act 1876 and failing the earlier clauses of the their lordships think prescribed by section 3 of the oudh laws act 1876 and failing the earlier clauses of the section lordships think prescribed by section 3 of the oudh laws act 1876 and failing the earlier clauses of the section which think prescribed by section 3 of the oudh laws act 1876 and failing the earlier clauses of the section which seem question must be judged is their lordships think prescribed by section 3 of the oudh laws act 1876 and failing the

Drig Bijai Singh Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Gonda and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1902)ILR24All420

the court upon a reference under section 9 of the oudh courts act xiv of 1891 as amended by act no the various interests specified in section 7 of the oudh laws act and to confer on the body of persons entitled provisions of section 7 and 9 of the oudh laws act 1876 and that question is therefore not referred to us of sections 7 and 9 of act no xviii of 1876 called the oudh laws act section 7 enacts that unless or under proprietary and in the cases referred to in section 40 of the oudh land revenue act and b to

ThakuraIn Sheoraj Kunwar Vs. Thakur Harihar Baksh Singh

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1910)12BOMLR508

emption under section 9 clauses i and 2 of the oudh laws act xviii of 1876 unless at the date of a term of the revenue law and as the oudh laws act 1876 and the oudh land revenue act were passed with a claim to pre emption under the oudh laws act 1876 in respect of three entire villages and two pattis of the revenue law and as the oudh laws act 1876 and the oudh land revenue act were passed on the the first or failing that the second clause of the section the learned judge pointed out even if as was suggested

Birendra Bikram Singh Vs. Brij Mohan Pande

Court : Privy Council

both suits as under proprietors had a right under the oudh laws act to pre empt in respect of the villages community within the meaning of cl 3 s 9 oudh laws act 1876 so as to entitle him to pre emption the cases referred to in s 40 oudh land revenue act and b to extend to the village site to the both suits were made under the oudh laws act of 1876 and the decision upon the above mentioned points must depend upon the proper construction to be placed on the relevant sections of that act part 3 ch 2 of the act

Fazle Rab Vs. Mohd. Yakeen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2003(2)SC1b; 2002(2)SCALE23; (2002)2SCC652; [2002]1SCR833

and others versus hayat mohammad and others air 33 1946 oudh 188 held that the customary right of pre emption ceased but in view of sections 7 and 8 of oudh laws act 1876 legislative recognition has been given to customary right to accept that after coming into force of the above act the customary right of pre emption ceased to exist in view of sections 7 and 8 of oudh laws act 1876 legislative recognition has been given to customary right of pre the owner to alienate the property but in view of sections 7 and 8 of oudh laws act 1876 legislative recognition

Ghanshyam Son of Sri Chimman Vs. District Magistrate,

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC274

w i village and road police act 1873 and the oudh laws act 1876 by the impugned order dated 3rd june i village and road police act 1873 and the oudh laws act 1876 by the impugned order dated 3rd june 2006 acquire a particular land land acquisition is not purely ministerial act to be performed by executive no direction in nature of provided for under section 36 of the oudh laws act 1876 which is quoted hereinbelow dismissal of village or road policeman of a village or road policeman is provided for under section 36 of the oudh laws act 1876 which is quoted

Ghanshyam Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

for the parties we find that the provisions of the oudh laws act 1876 do not require a full scale enquiry was a village policeman appointed under the provisions of oudh laws act 1876 read with the provisions of the u p road policeman as contained in section 10 of the 1873 act came to the conclusion that the rules of natural justice violation of the aforesaid provisions particularly section 36 of the 1876 act the writ petition was allowed on 19th july 2006 of 2006 complaining of violation of the aforesaid provisions particularly section 36 of the 1876 act the writ petition was allowed

Nawab Mirza Mohammad Kazim Ali Khan and Nawab Fakhr Zahan Begam Vs. Na ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1938)40BOMLR843

the taluqdari i e impartible estate 3 that under the oudh estates act 1869 the defendant took the taluqdari estate subject such property is protected by the provisions of the oudh laws act 1876 and by rules made under section 68 civil this allegation was disputed and the chief court did not act upon it as the learned judges considered that they were is protected by the provisions of the oudh laws act 1876 and by rules made under section 68 civil procedure code to be held subject to the provisions of the act section 15 of the act is as follows except as otherwise

Syed Nissar HussaIn Vs. Mst. Naseema

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR2010J& K59

state of oudh as back in 1876 section 5 of oudh laws act 1876 laid down that the court is not of oudh as back in 1876 section 5 of oudh laws act 1876 laid down that the court is not to however the dower is not a secured debt it is actionable claim and right to dower is transferable there is neither was made in the state of oudh as back in 1876 section 5 of oudh laws act 1876 laid down that reasonable dower having regard to the circumstances spelt out in section 2 of the act the trial court failed to take

Mohammad Raza and Others Vs. Mt. Abbas Bandi Bibi

Court : Privy Council

be judged is their lordships think prescribed by s 3 oudh laws act 1876 and failing the earlier clauses of the judged is their lordships think prescribed by s 3 oudh laws act 1876 and failing the earlier clauses of the section if on the part of the husband there is any act of neglect or estrangement towards either of the wives then their lordships think prescribed by s 3 oudh laws act 1876 and failing the earlier clauses of the section which seem accordingly appeal dismissed transfer of property act 4 of 1882 section 10 from oudh air 1929 oudh 193 cases referred 1