Ordinate - Judgment Search Results

V. Manickam Pillai Vs. State and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1972CriLJ1488

k n mudaliyar j 1 this is an appeal filed by manickam pillal p w i complainant against the order...

Jaipur Bottling Co. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1972WLN964

while valuable as caution cannot be taken as varying the ordinary rules for construing all statutes including taxing acts in attorney

Kishorilal and ors. Vs. Ladhu Ram and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1972WLN953

b p beri j 1 these 6 petitions for leave to appeal to the supreme court are directed against a...

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Ramdhan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1973Raj71; 1972()WLN839

beri j 1 these 268 special appeals indicated in the annexure i to this judgment preferred by the state of...

Gobind Ram Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1972SC989; 1972CriLJ620; 1972MhLJ462(SC); (1972)1SCC740; [1972]3SCR536

a n grover j 1 this is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the bombay high court...

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. the Bullion and Agricultural Produce ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1973All205

satish chandra j 1 this appeal raises an important question as to the powers possessed by the forward markets commission...

Sierra Club Vs. Morton

Court: US Supreme Court

s judgment and be quite content but this is not ordinary run of the mill litigation the case poses if only

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Sri Sarada Mills Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC281; [1973]43CompCas431(SC); (1972)2SCC877; [1973]2SCR464

..... relating to co operative societies act 1972 in the result at the commencement of the ordinance and the act insurer included a public company either incorporated under the companies act or ..... the present case was an insurer whose business was being voluntarily wound up therefore the ordinance and the act did not apply to the petitioner company 955 g it is important .....

Bhabadeb Mondal Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1972SC1852; 1972CriLJ1175; (1972)3SCC891; 1972(4)LC625(SC)

..... by the central government under s 3 of the defence of india ordinance 1962 they applied to the punjab and bombay high courts under s ..... person has been deprived of any such rights under the defence of india ordinance 1962 4 of 1962 or any rule or order made thereunder by ..... were not made under the defence of india ordinance or the act as they were outside the ordinance or the act or in excess of the .....

Keshav Dev S/O Chunilal Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC482; 1972CriLJ1196; (1972)2SCC77; 1973(5)LC54(SC)

..... s case the president of india promulgated the land acquisition amendment and validation ordinance 1 of 1967 the ordinance was later followed by the land acquisition amendment and validation act 1967 section ..... or purporting to have been made under the principal act before the commencement of the ordinance namely january 10 1967 notwithstanding that more than one declaration under s 6 had been .....